Logo
ISSUE #31.50 • NEWS • COLUMN
[Q & A]

Marie Wachlin


Portland prof instructs public-school teachers how to teach the Bible in class.

Share: | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 0 comments
Recently in "Q & A"

October 28th, 2009
Jon Raymond | Of hot springs, lost dogs and the Oregon Trail.0 comments

October 21st, 2009
Chris Kimball | The food revolution will be timed (and include a knife sharpener).1 comment

September 30th, 2009
Ken Rubin | The head of a new culinary program explains why there are too many cooks in the kitchen.5 comments

September 23rd, 2009
Sarah Weddington | What the lawyer who argued Roe V. Wade in the 1970s now thinks about the women’s movement and Barack Obama.0 comments

September 2nd, 2009
Gary Oxman | Should this fall’s back-to-school checklist include freaking out over swine flu?1 comment

August 19th, 2009
Jim Ellison | Why this town hall protester is damn mad. 1 comment

August 12th, 2009
Karin Hansen3 comments

July 8th, 2009
Ron Wyden | Oregon’s senior senator defends his health plan from hits by unions, Obama and other Democrats.5 comments

July 1st, 2009
John Kroger | Oregon’s Attorney General Answers WW’s Questions on The Adams Report.13 comments

June 24th, 2009
Sam Adams | The Mayor’s Take on the Kroger Report. 4 comments


Marie Wachlin
BY LEAH SOTTILE | lsottile at wweek dot com

[October 19th, 2005] For Marie Wachlin, it's clear that knowing the Bible gives public-school students an edge in class.

Wachlin, a 63-year-old adjunct professor at Concordia University's College of Education, bases her belief on a national study she conducted last year of 41 high-school English teachers and 1,002 high-school students.

Her study concluded that students who understand Bible stories and characters do better when studying and correctly understanding literature. Now, Wachlin is acting on her belief at the Christian university in Northeast Portland by spearheading one of the nation's first online courses in Bible-lit instruction for high-school English and humanities teachers.

Wachlin, a former English teacher at Benson High School, sat down with WW to talk about her Bible Literacy Project, the need for Bible instruction in a public school, and why it should trump the Koran and other holy books in the classroom.

WW: Why is knowing the Bible important in public schools?

Marie Wachlin: The Bible is central in our culture if you want to understand literature, music, art and public discourse—even the newspaper. It's assumed that people understand the Bible, and ... I was surprised when I did my research on how many people were teaching the Bible, and I think that's education's best-kept secret. We know that schools teach math and science and PE, but we don't put a sign on the school that says, "Bible Literature taught here."

But with a shorter school year in Oregon, for example, why devote time to something that could be handled in Sunday school?

You're right, they could learn [it] at Sunday school. For some people, that's important for a child's upbringing. But in Oregon, only 31 percent [of children] are churched. We could say that 69 percent of children are denied 2,000 years of access to culture.

OK. What do those kids need to know about the Bible?

They need to know major stories and characters. Knowing that there's the Hebrew Scriptures, the New Testament, the Old Testament. Knowing its place in history. Some students know David and Goliath. But when students hear "when your cup runneth over," does that mean you've made a mess on the table? No! It means you're overrun with blessings.














icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

Should kids simply read the Bible like any other story?

In the public-school classroom, you look at the characters, you look at the plot, you look at the irony. You look at it from an academic point of view, not a devotional standpoint.

Can there truly be an academic study of the Bible?

Absolutely, and I'm not alone in thinking that. That's not to say there isn't a teacher somewhere that closes the door and steps over the line. Teachers are more cautious than courageous. Even nervous.

Nervous?

You and I know, and surely Willamette Week's readers know...that if one precious child or one sensitive parent is offended, God in heaven will come down and zap that teacher with a swift and painful lightning bolt followed by a deafening thunderclap.

What about teaching the Koran or the Book of Mormon? Are those of value?

I'm for knowledge and against ignorance. In a high-school English class, you want to teach works that connect with students' lives. If there's another religious text that's influenced our culture, you'd certainly want to teach that. We don't have another religious text that's influenced Western culture like the Bible. And with the Koran, it's just not a part of our culture as much. You want to teach what's pertinent. That's not to say they're unimportant.

Are you a religious person?

Yes, I'm a Christian.

How do you combat criticisms that this might be influenced by your own agenda?

I guess I'd borrow a biblical allusion and say, "Come and see!" Part of being Christian is respecting and loving other people—I know that's not always a popular perception.... The older the child, then maybe you could discuss various ways to interpret a passage. But that's never come up when I've taught it from anyone.

That's hard to believe with all the debate over prayer in schools.

I've never encountered it.

As a Bible scholar, what do you think about intelligent design being taught with evolution?

The point of my study is literature. All knowledge is good; I wouldn't want to exclude anything.

Read Wachlin's study at www.bibleliteracy.org .

According to Wachlin, the biblical allusion referred to most often is Noah's Ark. Biblical allusions appear in a wide range of literary classics, from Shakespeare to Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon and Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird.

 

Rate This Story
5 average/1 vote

 
read all 0 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Marie Wachlin”

 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.