November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() |
[September 20th, 2006] Imagine you owned a bar offering drinks and food nobody else served. Business boomed to the point where you wanted to expand, so you applied for a permit from the cops. But a few months later, on the eve of your expansion, police finally decided to respond—with a threat to shut you down.
Oh, and one more thing in this hypothetical situation: Imagine cops had gotten public funding to start a bar just like yours—and planned to restrict out-of-towners from coming to your tavern, even though they were your lifeblood.
Couldn't happen, right? Wrong.
On Aug. 29, the day before school began, Oregon Connections Academy, an online charter school based in Scio, just south of Salem, got a letter from this week's Rogue, the Oregon Department of Education.
The Scio district had granted Connections a charter in April 2005, and the school served more than 700 students last year from across Oregon.
Then, last April, Scio applied to the ODE for its state funding in 2006-2007. Four months later, the education department told the school it wouldn't get its funding, saying it was illegally admitting students on a first-come, first-served—rather than lottery—basis and required—rather than suggested—that parents serve as "learning coaches."
What the letter didn't mention is that 2005 legislation gave ODE $2 million to start its own "virtual academy" and decreed no online school could enroll more than half its students from outside its sponsoring school district's boundaries. (Connections, which gets most of its students from outside Scio, was subsequently grandfathered.)
The ed department's Randy Harnisch acknowledges that the legislation potentially put the department in competition with Connections and that the enrollment limits could have hurt Connections. But Harnisch denies intentionally muscling Connections to help the state's nascent online charter effort.
Connections' principal, Jim Thomas, isn't sure, saying, "It's tough to have a regulator who is also a competitor,"
Connections agreed to comply with the ODE letter last week and will get its money, Thomas says." We think they're wrong...but we had no choice."
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Oregon Department of Education”
You admitted you weren't following ODE guidelines so you were denied funding. The changes you had to comply with are minor and shouldn't affect you business much at all.
This edi...
ODE was mandated by the legislature to create an oversight virtual school district. To date, they are working on, well...something. The only service it seemingly supplies to Oregon virtual schools is ...
RE: Lou Favreau
The ODE is not starting a virtual school. The so called "Oregon Virtual School District is only supplying "tools" like classes that are hard to get in rural areas f...
It is obvious by the web site that this is not a 'school' it is more like a potential library of classes if it is anything at all.
Why is WW saying DOE is in co...












