Logo
Lovejoy Surgicenter
ISSUE #34.25 • SPECIAL SECTION •

Measure 51


Yes!

BY WW EDITORIAL STAFF | 503-243-2122

[April 30th, 2008]

Crime victims are the last people who need hassles. And this measure aims squarely at eliminating a unique problem. The Oregon Constitution gives them certain rights, such as the right to be heard at sentencing, to be consulted about plea negotiations, and to receive prompt restitution.

But here’s the catch: The law gives them no way to enforce those rights. It’s an absurd snafu that exists only in Oregon and Virginia. And it’s because law enforcement and prosecutors were afraid that giving teeth to victims’ rights would gum up the system when Oregon voters passed the original victims’ rights law in 1999.

Experience in other states shows those fears are unfounded. Measure 51 provides the fix by giving crime victims the right to seek relief in the state Court of Appeals if their constitutionally enshrined rights are violated. Crime Victims United and Attorney General Hardy Myers are Measure 51’s prime backers, along with all the state’s district attorneys. Criminal defense lawyers and the ACLU helped draft the measure. If Crime Victims United and the ACLU can agree on this, so do we. Vote yes.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Video of WW endorsement interview (thanks to Portland Community Media)


Comment on Measure 51   Comment RSS feed

Adam Robins  writes on May 4th, 2008 12:48am

ACLU Oregon's website says that they are taking a neutral stance on measures 51, 52, and 53. How can this be construed as agreement with Crime Victims United or support of the measure?

Jeff  writes on May 12th, 2008 11:05am

You are WRONG about the ACLU. They do not endorse these measures. From their website:

"Ballot Measures 51 and 52 would amend constitutional provisions in the Oregon Bill of Rights that provide specific rights to victims in criminal proceedings.

The ACLU opposed these so-called

Jeff  writes on May 12th, 2008 11:13am

Measures 51 and 52 are supported by Crime Victims United and Kevin Mannox. They would give teeth to some constitutional amendments that “victims’ rights” advocates passed in 1999. What these two measures do is give crime victims more power in the courts. I believe the power to punish should rest squarely in the hands of the state, not with individual victims. As a progressive crime survivor, I am incensed that Crime Victims United would suggest I support their reactionary, right-wing agenda. These “victims rights” measures allow frightened and vindictive crime victims to make life miserable for both accused and convicted persons. Is that the direction we want our justice system headed? I don’t think so.

Bottom line: people who propose measures should have the burden of proof that these new measures are needed and will not have unintended consequences. Measures 51, 52, and 53 have not convinced me and I will vote “no.” Our state would be much better off if people voted “no” on measures like these and sent them back to the drawing board.

Roebuck  writes on May 12th, 2008 5:27pm

I think victims do not have enough rights . If you home get's broke in to the cops do not even show up . what's with that? Any way, When they do their job we wont have to.

James  writes on May 20th, 2008 8:26am

Beloof's absolutely correct that the present situation is one where rights have no remedy, but the larger question is whether those rights should even exist. What's the point of, for example, a victim's family member venting their grievances to a serial killer? The State, in the aggregate, brings criminal proceedings, so the 'personal' element should be entirely removed.

Mr Dickenson  writes on Jun 30th, 2008 4:11pm

Say goodby to a fare trile those who are acused of domistic violence

Comment on the "Measure 51" article
President
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Democrat
U.S. Senate (D)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF
U.S. Senate (R)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF
U.S. House District 1 (D)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Downtown Portland, Northwest Oregon, Pacific Coast
U.S. House District 1 (R)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Downtown Portland, Northwest Oregon, Pacific Coast
U.S. House District 3
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | From East Portland out to Government Camp
U.S. House District 5 (D)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Clackamas, Marion and Polk counties and the Central Coast
U.S. House District 5 (R)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF
Oregon Secretary of State
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Democrat
Oregon Attorney General
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Democrat
Oregon Senate District 23
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Northeast Portland
Oregon House District 38
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Lake Oswego, Southwest Portland
Oregon House District 42
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Inner Southeast Portland
Oregon House District 45
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Northeast Portland
Oregon House District 49
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | East Multnomah County
Oregon House District 52 (D)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Parts of Clackamas and Multnomah counties and all of Hood River County
Oregon House District 52 (R)
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Parts of Clackamas and Multnomah counties and all of Hood River County
Measure 51
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Yes!
Measure 52
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Yes!
Measure 53
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Yes!
Portland Mayor
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Nonpartisan
Portland City Commissioner, Position 1
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Nonpartisan
Portland City Commissioner, Position 2
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Nonpartisan
Portland City Commissioner, Position 4
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Nonpartisan
Multnomah County Commissioner, District 1
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | A slice of inner Southeast Portland and everything west of the Willamette River
Multnomah County Commissioner, District 3
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Most of inner Southeast and a slice of inner Northeast Portland
Multnomah County Commissioner, District 4
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | East Multnomah County
Metro District 2
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Clackamas County and Southwest Portland
Metro District 6
WW EDITORIAL STAFF | Southeast and Southwest Portland
 

Ad

Ad

Ad


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.