Logo
ISSUE #34.38 • NEWS •
[BUSINESS]

Can You Hear Me Now?


Noise complaint pits man vs. woman vs. machine.

Recently in "News"

November 4th, 2009
Murmurs • Lists. A Great Way To Organize The News You Follow.5 comments

November 4th, 2009
Dr. Know2 comments

November 4th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Not As Simple As 1-2-3 | Oregon’s upcoming census could mean another seat in congress.1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Rogue of the Week • University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?5 comments

November 4th, 2009
Gimme A Break | Earl Blumenauer’s bill pays people to ride their bikes to work, but not everyone’s cashing in yet.1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Giving Treebates | Planting a tree may lower your sewer bill. 3 comments

November 4th, 2009
The Daily Show | Can a new publisher reverse the slide at The Oregonian?1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Law Of Averages | As Skipper leaves the sheriff’s office, an investigation into an alleged coverup is part of his legacy.13 comments

November 4th, 2009
Hey, Neighbor! • Hey, Neighbor!0 comments


IS THAT RAP?: Never mind, it’s Vanilla Ice.
IMAGE: waltonportfolio.com
BY COREY PEIN | cpein at wweek dot com

[July 30th, 2008]

Stop, collaborate and listen: If Vanilla Ice annoys your neighbor, but his beats don’t violate city decibel limits, does it still warrant a fine?

This dispute coming soon to Multnomah County Circuit Court began about 10 pm on a Friday last September when Portland police officer Christopher Verbout responded to a call at Paula English’s home on Northeast 19th Avenue.

Even through the closed windows of English’s home, Verbout could hear Vanilla Ice’s obnoxious 1990 hit, “Ice Ice Baby,” coming from a wedding party next door at the Acadian Ballroom.

Verbout asked the ballroom manager to turn it down. English called police again later that night, but the party had ended by the time Verbout returned, according to the officer’s report.

A month later, the ballroom’s owners, Eric and Ronda Barton, received a $300 noise citation from the city.

The Bartons, who are active in the Alberta Street Business Association, chose to appeal the citation issued by the Bureau of Development Services. An administrative hearings officer ruled against them in January, and they’re now taking the city to court. A hearing is expected next month.

James B. Lee, a retired physicist specializing in room acoustics, is helping the Bartons with their case. He was part of a group in the early 1970s that lobbied the City Council to include an objective measure of sound volume—the decibel scale—into the city’s noise ordinance.

And he has been expecting a case like this for 35 years. Most people don’t fight the rap. “I’m surprised it took so long,” says Lee, who happens to have placed sixth out of 13 candidates in the May mayoral race.

The city ordinance says that from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., 60 decibels—about the volume of a normal conversation—is allowed in residential zones, as measured anywhere along the property line. At night, the allowed volume drops to 55 decibels—which the city compares to the sound of a small air conditioner at a distance of six feet.















icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

Separately, the code prohibits amplified sounds that are “plainly audible within any dwelling unit which is not the source of sound”—a more subjective measure.

Which brings us to the essence of the Bartons’ argument: They have their own decibel meter at the Acadian Ballroom. A city code enforcement officer actually helped them calibrate it back in 2006. The night of the “Ice Ice Baby” incident, the meter showed the music was at 55 decibels on the property line with English’s house—within code.

(Barton says Verbout—who is on vacation and couldn’t be reached for comment—saw the meter. If so, he didn’t put that in his report.)

The Bartons argue that their decibel reading should trump the officer’s ears. Otherwise, why did the Council bother to write the scientific measure in the code?

One might think city noise control officer Paul van Orden would side with the meter. But van Orden, also on vacation, convinced a city hearings officer that “the human ear is more sensitive to determining noise levels than the electronic equipment.”

Lee is firmly on the side of electronic quantification. “You can’t expect beat officers to be experts on sound pressure meters. That’s not realistic,” he says.

If the Bartons wind up losing, Eric Barton fears additional fines could put him out of business. After the third offense, each noise violation can bring a $5,000 fine. “We’ve got a business that needs to be loud, and we need to be as loud as we legally can be,” he says.

Or as Vanilla Ice warbled, “Dance go rush to the speaker that booms…if there was a problem, yo I’ll solve it.”

FACT: City code forbids “repetitive barking, whining, screeching, howling, braying or other like sounds” lasting 10 minutes continuously or over 30 minutes intermittently. Be sure the couple upstairs knows this.

 

Rate This Story
4.33 average/3 votes

 
read all 6 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Can You Hear Me Now?”

3

I wish this article had mentioned the tasteful panels the Ms. English had proactively erected.

The Bartons are a couple of the vocal minority of Alberta's business owners (liquor l...

rebecca, Aug 4th, 2008 10:01am
4

We have the same problem in the oh-so-trendy mississippi what-used-to-be-a-neighborhood. The MORONS who operate the gentrifier "Vintage Realty" have decided to further enhance their wallets ...

jussaskin, Aug 4th, 2008 9:31pm
5

Seems like it just comes down to how best to measure the volume (and I would argue that man beats machine in this case). If it is not totally clear that the law is actually being violated then no harm...

Bill Nye, Aug 7th, 2008 6:08pm
6

Bill Nye, You obviously read my earlier post carefully. I apologize for not quoting more of the ordinance itself. PCC 18.12.020, which you can read at http://www.portlandonline.com/auditor/index.cfm?a...

Craig Colby, Aug 21st, 2008 2:38pm
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.