Logo
ISSUE #31.47 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

Pretty Funny-Looking Financing


Why is a city agency having trouble using the equivalent of free money?

Share: | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 0 comments
Recently in "News"

November 4th, 2009
Murmurs • Lists. A Great Way To Organize The News You Follow.5 comments

November 4th, 2009
Dr. Know2 comments

November 4th, 2009
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Not As Simple As 1-2-3 | Oregon’s upcoming census could mean another seat in congress.1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Rogue of the Week • University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?5 comments

November 4th, 2009
Gimme A Break | Earl Blumenauer’s bill pays people to ride their bikes to work, but not everyone’s cashing in yet.1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Giving Treebates | Planting a tree may lower your sewer bill. 3 comments

November 4th, 2009
The Daily Show | Can a new publisher reverse the slide at The Oregonian?1 comment

November 4th, 2009
Law Of Averages | As Skipper leaves the sheriff’s office, an investigation into an alleged coverup is part of his legacy.13 comments

November 4th, 2009
Hey, Neighbor! • Hey, Neighbor!0 comments


BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[September 28th, 2005] The dysfunction of a major city initiative aimed at helping poor neighborhoods looks even worse than previously reported.

Two weeks ago, the Portland Development Commission announced that its Portland Family of Funds (PFF) offspring wouldn't seek more tax credits from a federal subsidy designed to attract investment to troubled neighborhoods.

In a Sept. 6 memo, new PDC director Bruce Warner explained to his board that the deals PFF was considering are "difficult to finance, have inexperienced and financially challenged project sponsors/developers and have experienced long delays to get underway."

The announcement, first reported by The Oregonian, that PFF would not seek additional credits has puzzled observers.

That's because PFF was successful in acquiring $100 million worth of the federal New Markets Tax Credits in 2004. And in a city with plenty of depressed neighborhoods, passing up what amounts to another round of free money is an admission of failure.

Among those puzzled at PFF's inability to put its tax credits to work is Mike Andrews, the Housing Authority of Portland's director for community revitalization. Last summer, the housing authority, which like PDC is a city agency, sought $13 million worth of tax credits to help fund its New Columbia project for lower-income residents in North Portland. HAP got just two responses. Neither of them came from PFF. "We were thinking we'd get a proposal from them," says Andrews.

PFF board chairman Carl Talton says he isn't sure why his board failed to compete for the housing authority's business. "We talked with them early on, but the discussions didn't go anywhere," Talton says.

Portland Family of Funds has a short but eventful history. Back in 2000, PDC decided to rely less on "tax-increment financing," paying for development by borrowing from future tax revenues the development hoped to generate. The city agency's reliance on that mechanism had drawn increasing criticism.

In 2001, then-PDC director Don Mazziotti hired Norris Lozano, a Texan with a checkered résumé (see "Coming Clean," WW, Nov. 26, 2003) to find different financing methods via a new spinoff known as Portland Family of Funds. Lozano's first deal to use tax credits was the $28 million conversion of the Pearl District's historic Armory into a new home for Portland Center Stage (see "The Great White Hoax," WW, Jan. 7, 2004).

Although Lozano executed the Armory deal while still on PDC's payroll, state law required that PFF become independent of PDC. But Lozano and his team of 12 also remained yoked to the development commission because the city agency must approve any use of the tax credits PFF acquired from the feds.

PFF retained another connection to PDC: It owed the development commission $870,000 for seed money and another $180,000 in working capital. In January 2005, PFF agreed to repay $189,700 annually.

The agreement didn't last long. On June 8, in one of his last moves as PDC director, Mazziotti recommended waiving the payments until additional tax-credit deals were closed. That recommendation came although the first payment wasn't due until January 2006 and PFF had just closed two deals. "Changing the schedule...avoids having PFF default on the promissory note," Mazziotti explained in a memo to his board.













icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

On its face, the change made some sense because PFF gets paid for the tax credits only when it closes a deal. But the debt holiday also created a loophole because PFF is free to pocket the money it earns separate from employing its tax credits.

For instance, Talton acknowledges the firm is earning fees on at least two local projects: the downtown Meier & Frank remodel and the Stadium Place development on West Burnside Street. PFF is also prospecting for other advisory business in California and the Southwest, Talton says. He adds that when PFF agreed to repay the debt, its only source of income was the tax credits it held.

Doug Blomgren, PDC's longest-serving commissioner, says he was unaware PFF has other sources of income. Blomgren says since PFF owes its existence to PDC, "it ought to be seriously considered whether those funds should be used as a source of repayment."

Although PDC and PFF work together on tax credits, relations between the two are strained. "We must make peace with PFF to achieve the goals we set out to achieve or we should cut our losses now return the credits and get out of the [tax-credit] business," wrote PDC deputy director Wyman Winston in an Aug. 9 email to his new boss, Warner. "I don't believe PDC and [PFF] can issue $60 million in [tax credits] by 9/30/07."

The September 2007 date is the deadline for PFF to commit the remainder of its original allocation of $100 million in tax credits. "We have not met one of the project dates over the past year," Winston added. "We don't reward for getting projects done, we reward for churning lots and lots of projects."

Despite its lack of interest in the New Columbia project, PFF has had so much difficulty finding suitable investments that earlier this year it proposed to use $25 million of tax credits to finance land purchases instead of developing projects.

Among the parcels under discussion, according to Warner's memo, are the land associated with the Burnside Bridgehead project, the Convention Center Headquarters Hotel and the financially ailing Interstate Firehouse Cultural Center in North Portland.

Land acquisitions would allow PFF to use tax credits quickly-which would both allow PFF to get paid and to beat the expiration deadline on the credits.

But creative ideas can't mask a fundamental problem: tax-increment financing hasn't diminished, and PFFs deals threaten to make things worse:

"The amount of TIF [tax-increment financing] resources has not been reduced, but in some cases actually increased," Warner wrote in his Sept. 6 memo. "This phenomenon is due to the lack of financial feasibility of the projects."

Despite all the problems, everybody involved agrees that New Markets Tax Credits are too attractive to forsake.

Two recent changes suggest that PDC and Mayor Tom Potter want greater influence in making sure they are put to good use.

Warner, Potter's choice to replace Mazziotti, has insisted on formalizing the joint PFF/PDC Committee that is supposed to oversee tax-credit investments. And beginning last month, PDC Commissioner Mark Rosenbaum, a close ally who chaired Potter's mayoral campaign, joined PFF's board.

"We want to signal that we're getting serious about getting these tax credits into the community," Warner says.

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 0 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Pretty Funny-Looking Financing”

 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.