Logo
OMSI
ISSUE #32.17 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

Cell Division


Portland's proposed cell-phone tax may end up unfairly targeting minorities.

Table of Contents: | Ring Tone

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 6 comments
Recently in "News"

November 26th, 2008
They Make You Wanna Shout | Memo to anti-gay protesters: Portland doesn’t have a Swedish consulate…or much sympathy for your cause.3 comments

November 26th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Associated Creditors Exchange | Chasing a debt to the ends of the Earth.4 comments

November 26th, 2008
The Score • A Mess With Taxes | How can Oregon give a $10 million tax break to a company whose affiliate may owe taxpayers $20 million?5 comments

November 26th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment

November 26th, 2008
A Matter Of Trust | A high-profile defense lawyer in Portland faces allegations that could end his career.9 comments

November 26th, 2008
Murmurs • A Heaping Plate Of News2 comments

November 26th, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our Spin On 7 Days of News0 comments

November 26th, 2008
Cover Story • Paulson’s Pitch | Why does Hank Paulson’s son want $85 million of your money?38 comments

November 19th, 2008
Meltdown Lowdown | So how is Portland’s new, new economy looking now?7 comments

November 19th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment



IMAGE: STEVE LIEBER
BY IAN DEMSKY | idemsky at wweek dot com

[March 1st, 2006] "Driving while black" is a well-chronicled fear for African Americans who spot a cop's lights flashing in their rearview mirror. And talking on your cell phone while driving is hazardous for all races.

Now, recent discussion of a cell-phone tax in Portland has led WW to find a third potential danger that combines the two, in or out of a car: using a cell phone while black.

One of the few concrete suggestions to come out of Mayor Tom Potter's recent school-funding summit was the resurrection of a proposed 5 percent tax on local cell-phone service. But WW has identified one segment of the population that might bear a bigger burden from such a tax: Portland's minorities.

Blacks use almost twice as many cell-phone minutes per month as whites, according to the most recent figures from the San Francisco-based industry research group Telephia.

In the third quarter of 2005, black customers averaged 1,220 minutes per month, nearly double the average of 632 minutes among whites. Hispanics also substantially beat out whites with 979 minutes, according to Telephia's analysis of monthly bills from more than 30,000 subscribers nationwide to the top five wireless providers.

In that quarter, Telephia found blacks paid an average of $69.42 per month, compared with $52.05 for whites and $60.31 for Hispanics.

The reasons for the difference are up for debate, but here's what its effect would be locally if a 5 percent tax were enacted.

In Portland, whites make up about 80 percent of the population and would therefore be shouldering most of a new tax burden, which Commissioner Randy Leonard estimates could generate anywhere from $8 million to $20 million a year for Portland schools.

But extrapolate the numbers from the Telephia analysis, apply a 5 percent tax and you'll find the typical black customer would pay more in cell-phone tax than a typical white customer by about one-third.

While the dollar amounts wouldn't be so high (blacks would pay about $10 more per year than whites, according to WW's calculations), it does raise questions of unintended consequences.

(To be fair, cell-phone providers could decide to eat the loss and not pass the new tax along to customers.)

Assuming a tax increase raised bills proportionally, an added 5 percent shock to blacks and Hispanics' cell phone bills would be a double whammy: Not only would they face higher bills, but they also earn less than whites and those dollars make up a higher percentage of their total income. As of 2000, the median household income for Portland's whites is $41,000, compared with $27,000 for blacks and $32,000 for Hispanics, according to the U.S. Census.














icon Story continues below

advertisement
OMSI
advertisement

State Sen. Avel Gordly (D-Portland), who is African-American, has been a supporter of the cell-phone tax and says she wants to see cell-phone usage statistics for the Portland area before judging whether anyone would be hurt unfairly.

"There's value in asking the questions," says Gordly. "I think with any form of tax or method of gathering revenue, we would want to understand the full implications and impact on those who would bear the costs."

Charles McGee, a 20-year-old African American who ran unsuccessfully for a seat on the Portland School Board last year, said he wouldn't support a tax that was regressive for minorities.

"I do believe something is needed, but I don't think disproportionately taxing one group of people would be that [solution], especially if the group you're taxing is not the group that is receiving, statistically, the best results from the service," McGee says.

Leonard, the city commissioner pushing the cell-phone tax for schools, says there would be reason for concern if Telephia's numbers hold up. But he's extremely skeptical about the figures.

"I've had a cell phone since their inception and no one has ever asked for my race," Leonard says. "I have a healthy suspicion of industry numbers. I would really want to see who did it, who paid them and how it was determined before I could actually buy into that."

^RING TONE

Nationwide, African Americans and Hispanics averaged more cell-phone minutes and paid higher cell bills than othersduring the third quarter of 2005.

GROUPAVERAGE MINUTESAVERAGE MONTHLY BILLESTIMATED MONTHLY TAX
African American 1,220 $69.42 $3.47
Hispanic Origin 979 $60.31 $3.02
Mixed Racial Background 888 $57.44 $2.87
Asian or Pacific Islander 845 $47.86 $2.39
White/Caucasian 632 $52.05 $2.60
Native American/Alaskan 623 $57.35 $2.37
Source: Telephia

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 6 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Cell Division”

3

Cell DivisionLet's not forget that landline service is already taxed. Shouldn't that be taken into consideration also? Do minorities in Portland tend to have both cell phones and landlines, or ...

Story Forum Archive, Mar 1st, 2006 12:00am
4

Cell Divisionthe answer is simple. if you don't want to pay the tax - hang up the damm phone!—silence is golden

Story Forum Archive, Mar 2nd, 2006 12:00am
5

Cell DivisionDon't let State Sen. Avel Gordly (D-Portland), fool you, there never was a tax she didn't want or voted against. Gordly always believed that government should take till there was n...

Story Forum Archive, Mar 2nd, 2006 12:00am
6

I stumbled on this article while looking for some cell phone usage statistics and could not believe it. How can you talk for over 1,000 minutes/month on a cell? If you are a productive member of soc...

Dave, Jan 8th, 2008 11:42am
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 1st 2008Paulson’s Pitch | Why does Hank Paulson’s son want $85 million of your money?
December 1st 2008House Of Gain | Aleksey Kalenichenko’s real-estate schemes cost banks hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s still a mystery how he pulled it off.
December 1st 2008Just Add Milk | Director Gus Van Sant delivers the story of the gay-rights movement’s patron saint in his most political film to date.
December 1st 2008Core Issue | Barack Obama says the way we pay teachers is rotten. Does Bill Sizemore (Bill Sizemore?!) have the answer?
December 1st 2008Ad Nauseam | Do TV ads about hot dogs, golf clubs and rape work? We bring in the experts.
December 1st 2008WW Voters’ Guide, November 2008 | Tough choices, no brainers: Our endorsements for the general election.
December 1st 2008Unlucky Strike | The Oregon lottery is going into detox—and our state budget is along for the smoke-free ride.
December 1st 2008Jail Junkies | Who knows more about stopping property crime: Kevin Mannix or an ex-addict who stole 1,000 cars?
December 1st 2008Shipracked | Judy Shiprack wants to be your next county commissioner. Here’s what she doesn’t want you to know about a real-estate deal gone bad.