Logo
ISSUE #32.23 • NEWS • NEWS STORY

Whistle While You Shirk?


Some Multnomah County commissioners might be happier working in France, according to a WW records analysis.

Recently in "News"

February 3rd, 2010
Rogue of the Week • Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Paulson Shoots, Scores | The Timbers’ Owner closes a sweet ballpark deal, but doubts remain.3 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Sex And The City | Will gender reassignment surgery be a new city insurance benefit? 2 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Second Time Around | What the mayor will likely tout in his State of the City Speech. 0 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Hot Seat • Gov. Ted Kulongoski | Why the governor wants to deal with your kicker check in his last session.5 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Murmurs • Always Asking, Always Telling.1 comment

February 3rd, 2010
Dr. Know • Dr. Know1 comment

February 3rd, 2010
Letters to the Editor • Inbox3 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Cover Story • The Crusaders | Eight relentless watchdogs who hound public officials in pursuit of answers.44 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.2 comments


Lonnie Roberts
BY IAN DEMSKY | idemsky at wweek dot com

[April 12th, 2006] Three of Multnomah County's five commissioners appear to be working closer to a four-day work week than five, according to WW's analysis of appointment calendars and parking records that gave commissioners every benefit of the doubt.

The biggest slacker is Commissioner Lonnie Roberts, whose records over a two-month period leave three and a half weeks unaccounted for. On some days, Roberts' calendar notes only that he is "in East County," the district he represents, while his colleagues log multiple events for themselves and their staff almost every day.

Roberts did not return several telephone calls from WW. And his Gresham office was locked and dark when WW tried to visit on Friday, despite his calendar's listing him as being there on Wednesdays and Fridays. A note outside the office directed constituents to make an appointment by phone. WW did not credit Roberts for time he listed only as "East County."

Meanwhile, commissioners Maria Rojo de Steffey and Lisa Naito weren't exactly burning the midnight oil either, at least not on paper. Both averaged slightly more than four eight-hour days a week in January and February (see chart).

In addition, Rojo de Steffey and Naito both spent more than a week on vacation or at out-of-town conferences that WW did not count against them in its calculations. Both say the analysis doesn't capture their true workloads. (County commissioners aren't required to work any set hours and can take as much vacation as they deem proper.)

Admittedly, our analysis wasn't scientific. County parking garage records were sometimes incomplete, and the commissioners didn't always come and go in their own cars or work out of their offices.

But commissioners aren't required to submit time sheets, so their calendars and parking records are the public's only way of knowing how hard the $71,000-a-year commissioners and $91,000 chair are working.

"Some weeks seem like they're 30 hours; others seem like they're 50 hours," says Commissioner Serena Cruz Walsh, who puts in more than 40 hours per week, according to WW's analysis. "It all seems to average out in the end. The expectation is that the voters will kick us out of office if they think we're not doing our job."

When WW explained its methodology, Cruz Walsh said she supported the lengths taken as fair.

First, we didn't subtract time for lunch unless calendars noted a private lunch event or records showed the commissioners leaving the office at lunchtime without a work-related meeting scheduled.

Second, if there was any question whether an event was personal or work-related, we counted it as work. (For example, we counted the seven hours Rojo de Steffey spent at a Heart Ball and gala Saturday, Feb. 11, toward her work week.) Third, we did not hold commissioners' vacation days or













icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

out-of-town conferences against them.

Despite all those concessions, only Cruz and county Chair Diane Linn appeared to be averaging 40 hours per week. (And yes, we did subtract all campaign-related events we could identify from the schedule of Linn, who's running for re-election.)

So what's the big deal about working a 35-hour versus a 40-hour week? Well, consider this: Over a year, that difference would add up to the equivalent of an extra six weeks of vacation.

Which might cut the Dijon in France but not in the workaholic U.S.A. Even if you conceded a more relaxed 37.5-hour work week, that's still more than three extra weeks off.

Rojo de Steffey estimated she worked between 35 and 50 hours per week—"during the budget maybe 60."

She says her calendar doesn't reflect time she spends in the morning and evenings responding to work emails and working via a remote interface with her office computer. Rojo de Steffey also works from home many Fridays, catching up on tasks.

"It's the only way I can get anything else done," she says. "If I come in here, people want to talk to me all the time."

Naito estimated that apart from slow summer and holiday times, she often averages 50 to 60 hours a week, including keeping up with county business with phone meetings and emails even while on vacation. She has also been busy with the National Association of Counties public safety steering committee, which frequently takes her out of town.

"I don't really think that [WW's analysis] is a true reflection of my time," she says. "I'm sure it'd be higher than that."

She says the question to ask is not how long commissioners are working, but what they've accomplished.

Here is a comparison of the five Multnomah County commissioners' work habits based on WW's review of their January and February appointment calendars and county parking records.

Commissioneraverage work weekout of town conferencevacation
(Chair) Diane Linn 39.7 hours 3 days
Serena Cruz Walsh 40.5 hours 2 days
Maria Rojo de Steffey 34.9 hours 6 days
Lisa Naito 33.6 hours 7 days 1 day
Lonnie Roberts 19.7 hours 4 days
News intern Erika-Leigh Goodwin contributed to this report.

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 3 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Whistle While You Shirk?”

1

Whistle While You Shirk?Given their performance in the aggregate why would we want them spending more time than what they are..... —Harley Leiber

Story Forum Archive, Apr 12th, 2006 12:00am
2

Whistle While You Shirk?Mr. Demsky,We, the voters, did not elect these folks to put in time at their desks by the hour. We elected them for performance, adherence to their campaign promises an...

Story Forum Archive, Apr 13th, 2006 12:00am
3

Whistle While You Shirk?See, that's a big problem with jobs like that. There's no supervision. Come and go as you please, Ben Dover to the special interest group du jour, and cash big fat pay...

Story Forum Archive, Apr 15th, 2006 12:00am
 
 
 




 

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55838) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55842) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55844) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=58781) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55843) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55841) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55839) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55840) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61


More


More


More


More


More


More


More


More

Ad

Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips
Camping Gear


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.