Flags Of Our Fathers
Clint Eastwood's latest keeps eyelids at half-staff.
December 3rd, 2008
Brew Views • Top 5 Movies To Watch In Theater Pubs This Week0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
Ballast | The weight of death in the Mississippi Delta.0 comments
December 3rd, 2008
He Fixes The Cable? | James Westby bridges the divide between porn and comedy.2 comments
November 26th, 2008
A Christmas Tale | Home (and hated) for the holidays.0 comments
November 26th, 2008
Australia | Throw another cliché on the barbie.0 comments
November 26th, 2008
The Gay Warrior | Harvey Milk’s victorious public display of affection.0 comments
November 26th, 2008
Brew Views • Top 5 Movies to Watch in Theater Pubs This Week0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Watching Movies With... | The First Two People In Line For Twilight0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Mirror’s Edge | XBOX 360 / PS3 / Dice Studios (Electronic Arts)
The return of the run-and-shoot offense.0 comments
November 19th, 2008
Remotely Controlled • Down The Tube | They say it’s the Golden Age of TV. It will be if you stop watching crap.4 comments
![]() |
[October 18th, 2006] According to the opening voiceover of Flags of Our Fathers, the American people require "easy-to-understand truths and damn few words" in order to make sense out of war. The voiceover outlines the intellectual locus of the film: When it comes to making heroes, a picture is worth a thousand words. Meanwhile, director Clint Eastwood drags us through a montage of historic photographs and scenes of old men telling their war stories. Even at this early stage, this much is clear: Flags may look like an epic war film, but it's really just a grisly, clichéd and exhausting lecture. Eastwood should have followed the advice of his movie's central theme and allowed the events and images to speak for themselves. Instead, didacticism drags down a potentially fascinating and tragic historical drama. Even the images themselves are problematic; footage that should have been stunning—such as an aerial view of the massive U.S. Navy buildup around the southern beach of Iwo Jima—is, through Eastwood's lens, flat and melodramatic. Other moments are just plain corny. At a banquet in the heroes' honor, waiters serve a meringue sculpture of their historic flag-raising and then, without any sense of irony whatsoever, pour bright red strawberry gore all over the dessert. Throughout the picture, the characters and dialogue are as canned as Army rations, so we can't even take pleasure in pulling for the unlucky young men fighting and dying on a desolate island. In fact, the violence that kills most of the boys serves the viewer best by clearing up any confusion about who is who. With poorly delineated characterizations and largely unfamiliar actors, the main characters are set apart primarily by being the only ones left standing, and the movie soldiers on, muttering lamely to itself about heroism. After all is said and done, a single picture really cannot make sense out of a war. Rather, it illuminates a moral fault line and inspires viewers to stand on one side or the other. Flags is the first installment of Eastwood's ambitious pair of films about the Battle of Iwo Jima. Here's hoping that the second installment, Letters from Iwo Jima, which will endeavor to tell the story from the Japanese perspective, blows its predecessor away. R .
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Flags Of Our Fathers”
With corny, rah-rah flicks like "Flags..." and "Marine" coming out, you'd swear it was getting close to election day in America.










