Logo
Lovejoy Surgicenter
ISSUE #32.50 • SCREEN • REVIEW

Flags Of Our Fathers


Clint Eastwood's latest keeps eyelids at half-staff.

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 1 comment
Recently in "Screen"

December 3rd, 2008
Brew Views • Top 5 Movies To Watch In Theater Pubs This Week0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
Ballast | The weight of death in the Mississippi Delta.0 comments

December 3rd, 2008
He Fixes The Cable? | James Westby bridges the divide between porn and comedy.2 comments

November 26th, 2008
A Christmas Tale | Home (and hated) for the holidays.0 comments

November 26th, 2008
Australia | Throw another cliché on the barbie.0 comments

November 26th, 2008
The Gay Warrior | Harvey Milk’s victorious public display of affection.0 comments

November 26th, 2008
Brew Views • Top 5 Movies to Watch in Theater Pubs This Week0 comments

November 19th, 2008
Watching Movies With... | The First Two People In Line For Twilight0 comments

November 19th, 2008
Mirror’s Edge | XBOX 360 / PS3 / Dice Studios (Electronic Arts)
The return of the run-and-shoot offense.0 comments

November 19th, 2008
Remotely Controlled • Down The Tube | They say it’s the Golden Age of TV. It will be if you stop watching crap.4 comments


BY KATE LEBO | 503 243-2122

[October 18th, 2006] According to the opening voiceover of Flags of Our Fathers, the American people require "easy-to-understand truths and damn few words" in order to make sense out of war. The voiceover outlines the intellectual locus of the film: When it comes to making heroes, a picture is worth a thousand words. Meanwhile, director Clint Eastwood drags us through a montage of historic photographs and scenes of old men telling their war stories. Even at this early stage, this much is clear: Flags may look like an epic war film, but it's really just a grisly, clichéd and exhausting lecture. Eastwood should have followed the advice of his movie's central theme and allowed the events and images to speak for themselves. Instead, didacticism drags down a potentially fascinating and tragic historical drama. Even the images themselves are problematic; footage that should have been stunning—such as an aerial view of the massive U.S. Navy buildup around the southern beach of Iwo Jima—is, through Eastwood's lens, flat and melodramatic. Other moments are just plain corny. At a banquet in the heroes' honor, waiters serve a meringue sculpture of their historic flag-raising and then, without any sense of irony whatsoever, pour bright red strawberry gore all over the dessert. Throughout the picture, the characters and dialogue are as canned as Army rations, so we can't even take pleasure in pulling for the unlucky young men fighting and dying on a desolate island. In fact, the violence that kills most of the boys serves the viewer best by clearing up any confusion about who is who. With poorly delineated characterizations and largely unfamiliar actors, the main characters are set apart primarily by being the only ones left standing, and the movie soldiers on, muttering lamely to itself about heroism. After all is said and done, a single picture really cannot make sense out of a war. Rather, it illuminates a moral fault line and inspires viewers to stand on one side or the other. Flags is the first installment of Eastwood's ambitious pair of films about the Battle of Iwo Jima. Here's hoping that the second installment, Letters from Iwo Jima, which will endeavor to tell the story from the Japanese perspective, blows its predecessor away. R .














icon Story continues below

advertisement
OMSI
advertisement

Pioneer Place, Division, Bridgeport, Evergreen, Cinetopia, City Center

 

Rate This Story
Be the first to rate this story.

 
read all 1 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Flags Of Our Fathers

1

With corny, rah-rah flicks like "Flags..." and "Marine" coming out, you'd swear it was getting close to election day in America.

Mike Quigley, Oct 18th, 2006 9:05am
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 5th 2008The Naked And The Dread | The Recession has knocked everything but our socks off.
December 5th 2008Paulson’s Pitch | Why does Hank Paulson’s son want $85 million of your money?
December 5th 2008House Of Gain | Aleksey Kalenichenko’s real-estate schemes cost banks hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s still a mystery how he pulled it off.
December 5th 2008Just Add Milk | Director Gus Van Sant delivers the story of the gay-rights movement’s patron saint in his most political film to date.
December 5th 2008Core Issue | Barack Obama says the way we pay teachers is rotten. Does Bill Sizemore (Bill Sizemore?!) have the answer?
December 5th 2008Ad Nauseam | Do TV ads about hot dogs, golf clubs and rape work? We bring in the experts.
December 5th 2008WW Voters’ Guide, November 2008 | Tough choices, no brainers: Our endorsements for the general election.
December 5th 2008Unlucky Strike | The Oregon lottery is going into detox—and our state budget is along for the smoke-free ride.
December 5th 2008Jail Junkies | Who knows more about stopping property crime: Kevin Mannix or an ex-addict who stole 1,000 cars?