Critiquing The Uncritiquable
Two local art shows leave Richard Speer (gasp) at a loss for words.
November 12th, 2008
Q & A • Jeanine Jablonski | Economy be damned, Fourteen30’s got bold ideas for our art scene.3 comments
October 29th, 2008
The Nines | Don’t just look at local art—sleep with it.0 comments
October 22nd, 2008
Brenden Clenaghen at Pulliam Deffenbaugh | Portrait of an artist—in search of a new style.0 comments
October 15th, 2008
Juri Morioka At Butters | The New York painter transcends the prosaic.2 comments
October 1st, 2008
Bruce Conkle at Rocksbox0 comments
October 1st, 2008
Gate Closing | Why is Jennifer Gately leaving the Portland Art Museum?3 comments
September 17th, 2008
Volume at Worksound | Portland artists explore space in curator-about-town Jeff Jahn’s latest show. 0 comments
September 3rd, 2008
Ed Ruscha at the Portland Art Museum | An edgy elegy to youth from a pop art original.0 comments
August 13th, 2008
History Versus Nostalgia | Two shows offer differing takes on the swingin’ ’60s, ’70s, and ’80s.0 comments
July 30th, 2008
Something To Believe In | With Immaterialized, Disjecta scores a direct hit.0 comments
![]() Installation from the Museum of Sacred Subjects & Objects by Ca-leb Shelley Lambides at Launch Pad IMAGE: BEN PINK |
[November 15th, 2006] Sometimes art is uncriticizable even by a critic. This month at Pulliam Deffenbaugh, Baba Wagué Diakité offers folk-art ceramic sculptures that depict animals and spirit icongraphy from his native Mali. At the First Thursday opening, the artist held court with great charm, dressed in traditional robes and headdress. The vibes were warm, the ambiance genial, but the work was about as interesting as tepid bathwater. If I said you could buy better art at one-twentieth the price from any random street artist on Northeast Alberta—if I suggested that this work is monumentally boring, that folk art in general is more interesting to future archaeologists than present-day art collectors—would I become one of those culturally insensitive WASP imperialists, dismissing not only the present show, but also, by implication, the folkloric traditions of the Malian people themselves? Is this show effectively impossible to criticize? Well, no. But these tough, healthy questions highlight the gray area between art as aesthetic thesis and art as cultural document.
929 NW Flanders St., 228-6665. Closes Dec. 2.
A similar quandary is posed by Launch Pad's thought-provoking group show, Shrines, Altars, and Reliquaries, in which 13 artists play theme-and-variations on the Day of the Dead. The show's most moving piece is Ca-leb Shelley Lambides' Installation from the Museum of Sacred Subjects & Objects, an altar to the artist's brother Colin, who died last year at 29. Colin's ashes and a lock of his hair are inside a wooden box within the altar, balanced atop an empty hourglass. On a table sits a bottle of his favorite spirit, Grand Marnier, which viewers are invited to sip in his honor. Prominently displayed is a travel snapshot in which Colin crouches, brown-eyed and beatific, on the shores of the Ganges. If I observed that, formally speaking, this altar is an iconographic retread that breaks no new aesthetic ground whatsoever, would I be insulting the memory of the artist's brother? Well, no. But there is a point at which art rises above the critiquable into the inexpressible, and Lambides' installation has identified that point precisely. I was deeply moved by the altar, as were dozens of others on opening night who crowded around the picture of Colin with his brown hair and brown eyes, Colin soulful and beautiful and dead of causes unknown to me. Like music and dance, visual art is often strongest when it bypasses critical analysis and expresses what words cannot.
534 SE Oak St., (971) 227-0072. Closes Nov. 28.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Critiquing The Uncritiquable”










