November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() |
[May 16th, 2007]
Just because something complies with the law doesn't make you less of a Rogue if it isn't right.
Therefore, this week's award goes to the Port of Portland for its legal, but lazy, move to chop down 225 trees near Portland International Airport during birds' peak nesting season.
The Port says the tree-felling is needed to create a new lane in both directions on Airport Way as well as a new 3,500-space parking garage.
But Bob Sallinger, conservation director of the Audubon Society of Portland, blasts the Port's decision to remove the bird habitat in May.
Why? Because the project has been in the works since late 2005. Waiting until now means that nearly all 209 bird species in the area (including several that are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act) will be hiding in well-concealed nests to avoid predators when workers start shouting, "Timber!"
"This is an example of the Port once again doing the absolute minimum required by law," says Sallinger.
A city-approved conditional-use master plan for the airport doesn't require the Port to replace lost landscape. Still, the Port's mission statement says it integrates environmental concerns with its planning. That's hard to square with this project, given that even the Port's wildlife manager, Nick Atwell, says "it's definitely not an ideal time" for the tree-chopping.
advertisement
(Atwell says he and his workers search for nests before and after trees are felled. So far, they have identified only one American-crow nest.)
Port spokesman Steve Johnson ascribes the project's delay to the Federal Aviation Administration, which granted the Port permission to go ahead only in late April. "We had actually hoped to remove the necessary trees before the nesting season," he says.
Johnson couldn't say every felled tree would be replaced, because officials don't want to attract birds back to an area where aircraft take off and land.
But the Rogue Desk asks why the Port couldn't have filed a better flight plan to finish the project without evicting our feathered friends.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Port of Portland”
What can the citizens of Portland do to stop this action during nesting season?
It's a done deal Bonnie, the trees are already down now!
Port of Portland. How typical. The Port is notorious for inflating their environmental program as innovative and progressive when most of its substance is stuff they've been required to do by federal ...
Well, you know how it goes... 225 trees become 325, become 525 trees marked with an X. before you know it, 20 acres of Black Cottonwood is flatland. The birds will be pissed. The best solution is sele...












