Logo
ISSUE #33.39 • NEWS • NEWS STORY
[TRANSPORTATION]

Park Place


Snazzy parking meter upgrades show a Catch-22 in transit funding.

Social bookmarking | Permalink
Email | Print | Rate It! | 9 comments
Recently in "News"

November 26th, 2008
They Make You Wanna Shout | Memo to anti-gay protesters: Portland doesn’t have a Swedish consulate…or much sympathy for your cause.3 comments

November 26th, 2008
Rogue of the Week • Associated Creditors Exchange | Chasing a debt to the ends of the Earth.3 comments

November 26th, 2008
The Score • A Mess With Taxes | How can Oregon give a $10 million tax break to a company whose affiliate may owe taxpayers $20 million?5 comments

November 26th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment

November 26th, 2008
A Matter Of Trust | A high-profile defense lawyer in Portland faces allegations that could end his career.8 comments

November 26th, 2008
Murmurs • A Heaping Plate Of News2 comments

November 26th, 2008
The Weekly Fix • Our Spin On 7 Days of News0 comments

November 26th, 2008
Cover Story • Paulson’s Pitch | Why does Hank Paulson’s son want $85 million of your money?37 comments

November 19th, 2008
Meltdown Lowdown | So how is Portland’s new, new economy looking now?7 comments

November 19th, 2008
Letters to the Editor • Inbox1 comment


BY COREY PEIN | cpein at wweek dot com

[August 8th, 2007]

Portland is gaining ground in the endless march toward greater convenience. Soon, you may be able to refill your parking meter with your cell phone. At last!

This week, the City Council is expected to give transportation officials the option to spend up to $365,000 for the technology. The hope is to meet "the growing demand for new customer cell-phone parking payment options." Read: to meet growing demand for something totally obscure.

This could bring the size of the city's two-year-old contract with Cale Parking Systems, which supplies about 200 of those green-painted, solar-powered "SmartMeters" downtown and in the Lloyd District, to $1.95 million—a 23 percent increase.

"The money could easily go elsewhere, instead of [for] something that could be nifty but totally unnecessary," said actress Kristen Martz, 24, after parking in the Pearl.

And in a city that officials like to tout as bike friendly and getting in gear for a carless Peak Oil world, the meter upgrades also represent more than the Portland Office of Transportation wants to spend on bicycle safety improvements—$300,000—in the next fiscal year.

"It's more than we spend on a lot of things," says Commissioner Sam Adams, who oversees the city's Office of Transportation. "This is because parking pays for itself and then some. We use parking revenues to subsidize all sorts of other programs."

True. But the $365,000 cell-phone parking-meter project—and the fact that bike projects are funded with motorists' spare change—shows that however much Portland's leaders want to wean people from their gas-guzzlers, the automobile still rules. And it will continue to rule, as long as parking fees pay for transportation projects.

"As people drive less, you collect fewer revenues," says Roger Geller, the city's bicycle coordinator. "That's part of the reason Commissioner Adams is trying to find more funding for transportation, using different methods."

The federal government is an attractive mark, if not an easy one, to find money. So it's a promising sign that the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, a nonprofit that has successfully lobbied Congress for multimillion-dollar bike projects, is holding its annual conference at Portland State University this week.

But if grants aren't forthcoming, then what will generate revenue? Geller says the U.S. Department of Transportation is looking for a place to test-drive London-style entrance tolls, called "congestion pricing." New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg tried to implement such a system there, but it died at the state level. Portland isn't ready for congestion pricing, Geller says.














icon Story continues below

advertisement
OMSI
advertisement

"People react to crisis. And we're not in crisis yet," he says. "Do you think it would be feasible to ask people to pay $10 every time they cross the Willamette River? Probably not." Besides, he adds, the public transit network here is still too underdeveloped for people to quit cars en masse.

So, until Oregon's legislative delegation delivers some bike-friendly pork, Portland's transit planners are chained to the parking meters. "It's our only source of discretionary revenues," says Ellis McCoy, Portland's parking czar.

McCoy said the possible pay-by-phone upgrades would add "flexibility," but not necessarily increase revenue. Installing more SmartMeters around the city, however, might. Cale president George Levey boasts that SmartMeters increase a city's parking revenues by up to 60 percent. How? Simple. You can't roll into a parking spot and finish off the unexpired time on a meter.

McCoy, more modestly, attributes a 20 to 30 percent increase in parking revenues between 2002 and 2006 to the SmartMeters, which date back beyond Cale's involvement. (There was also that 2005 fee hike from $1 an hour to $1.25 and an extension of enforcement hours from 6 pm to 7 pm.)

Yet the SmartMeter windfall can't last forever. Parking revenues fluctuate with the overall economy. The city expects to take in $13.8 million from meters in the coming year—a less-than-1 percent increase on actual collections in 2006.

It'll take a lot more than that to build the bike-friendly, train-loving Portland city planners say they want. Which is why all wannabe transit revolutionaries should pay attention to upcoming state and federal elections. Portland needs the pork.

See Portlanders' reactions in this video:

News intern Paul Leonard contributed to this report.

 

Rate This Story
3.33 average/3 votes

 
read all 9 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Park Place”

6

I'd suggest you look into credit card security on these machines before getting too worked up elsewhere. The credit card industry has developed strict requirements (Payment Applications Best Practice...

Ted, Aug 10th, 2007 11:26am
7

Many cities have been able to offer this service without paying a cent for it. Some places don't even require the meters at all in which case there are no capital costs. What is Cale getting for the...

Bob, Aug 10th, 2007 1:46pm
8

Bob is completely right about the service being available at no cost to the city. I'll declare my position as a supplier of the pay by cell phone or pay online service that has been deployed city wide...

Neil , Aug 10th, 2007 3:56pm
9

If you used Zipidy you could pay by cell phone or coins - and NOT buy those expensive, someday outmoded meters. You could use existing meters. means more money going to city coffers. And you facilita...

kare anderson, May 8th, 2008 12:35pm
 
 
 





Recently in Willamette Week
December 1st 2008Paulson’s Pitch | Why does Hank Paulson’s son want $85 million of your money?
December 1st 2008House Of Gain | Aleksey Kalenichenko’s real-estate schemes cost banks hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s still a mystery how he pulled it off.
December 1st 2008Just Add Milk | Director Gus Van Sant delivers the story of the gay-rights movement’s patron saint in his most political film to date.
December 1st 2008Core Issue | Barack Obama says the way we pay teachers is rotten. Does Bill Sizemore (Bill Sizemore?!) have the answer?
December 1st 2008Ad Nauseam | Do TV ads about hot dogs, golf clubs and rape work? We bring in the experts.
December 1st 2008WW Voters’ Guide, November 2008 | Tough choices, no brainers: Our endorsements for the general election.
December 1st 2008Unlucky Strike | The Oregon lottery is going into detox—and our state budget is along for the smoke-free ride.
December 1st 2008Jail Junkies | Who knows more about stopping property crime: Kevin Mannix or an ex-addict who stole 1,000 cars?
December 1st 2008Shipracked | Judy Shiprack wants to be your next county commissioner. Here’s what she doesn’t want you to know about a real-estate deal gone bad.