November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() IMAGE: Cliff Li |
[May 7th, 2008]
For a big-league political consultant, this week’s Rogue , Elaine Franklin , made a rookie mistake in the current election cycle.
Franklin is best known for zealously protecting her former boss and current husband, ex-U.S. Sen. Bob Packwood, when the Oregon Republican was hounded from the Senate for, well, being a hound. She subsequently ran several high-profile statewide races, working for GOP gubernatorial candidates Denny Smith in 1994 and Ron Saxton in 2002, in addition to numerous legislative campaigns.
But she recently made a Roguish mistake while working in the political minor leagues for Phyllis Thiemann in the GOP primary for House District 52.
Two high-profile Republicans—Gail Atteberry, director of the anti-abortion group Oregon Right to Life, and J.L. Wilson, a lobbyist for Associated Oregon Industries—say Franklin told them that Thiemann’s opponent, mixed-martial arts fighter Matt “The Law” Lindland, is a felon.
That’s false. Court records—which Franklin emailed to WW—show Lindland’s only criminal conviction is a misdemeanor for stealing $29.65 worth of groceries 18 years ago.
As an experienced political operative, Franklin should know better than shoveling dirt that can easily be disproven. And as someone who claims the moral high ground—she famously quit the Republican Party after the 2002 primary, sick of intolerant conservatives—she ought to think twice before throwing mud at somebody who kicks people for a living.
Initially, Franklin issued a denial: “I am not spreading rumors that Matt Lindland has a felony conviction on his record,” she wrote WW in a May 2 email. But after WW produced assertions from Wilson and Atteberry to the contrary (see wwire) and Lindland promised legal action if she didn’t issue a written apology, Franklin wrote in a May 5 email, “Because Lindland has threatened to sue me and on the advice of my lawyer I will have no further comment on this issue.”
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Elaine Franklin”
Dear Elaine,
You appear to be having problems comprehending the circumstance you have placed yourself in.
Matt Lindland did not "threaten" to sue you. ...
Franklin's refusing further comment on the issue is not a retraction of her previous remarks. Her response is not enough to preclude a lawsuit.
Ah yes, the good ol' "throw anything and everything at the wall to see what sticks" strategy. This kind of thing is only utilized by desperate political campaigns. She doesn't need a kick fr...













