November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.5 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() WW Photo Illustration |
[July 30th, 2008]
For wasting taxpayer dollars by sending his constituents junk mail about not wasting taxpayers’ dollars, U.S. Rep David Wu (D-Ore.)—who’s up for re-election in November—gives the Rogue Desk a $53,500 headache.
This month, the five-term Democrat’s constituents in the First Congressional District (from downtown Portland to the coast) got a flier in the mail telling them what we already know: The Iraq war is costing billions.
“It’s time to invest here at home,” Wu’s color, three-panel flier continues.
Fine sentiment. What’s Roguish is the use of $53,500 in taxpayer money to send thinly veiled campaign literature known as “franked mail” when A) the theme is saving money and B) taxpayer dollars aren’t meant to support a candidate’s re-election.
To be fair, Wu violated no rules. Printed and mailed with money from lawmakers’ office budgets, the flier was approved by a bipartisan committee that monitors Congress’ “franking” privileges. Among other things, “frankable” fliers must be mailed at least 90 days before an election, they can’t explicitly advocate for a candidate, and they can’t be used for partisan purposes.
“He thinks it’s a priority to communicate with his constituents,” adds Wu spokeswoman Julia Krahe.
That doesn’t mean we can’t ask about Wu’s other priorities—one of which is getting re-elected in less than 100 days.
On the back of his flier, Wu writes: “For the tax dollars spent just by residents of our congressional district [on the Iraq war] we could afford…16,973 more elementary school teachers for one year.”
True. And for $53,500, 150 elementary school children in Portland also could eat lunch for free for a year. Instead, Wu fed at the taxpayers’ trough to fatten his campaign.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “David Wu”
Republicans have now proven what we have always suspected, that they are only fiscally responsible when the have to pay someone else something.
When it comes to padding their own i...
If Wu wants to "communicate with his contituents", have a friggin news conference...and I can only assume Wu doesnt think we have the intellect to read the paper or listen to the news...WE ...
This is a much deeper issue than this article makes it out to be. Not only did Wu waste taxpayer money on this, he also responds to thousands of constituent inquiries with 3- and 4-page form letters t...
David Wu avoids face to face conversations with constituents especially if their point of view doesn't agree with his own which reveals that he believes only his opinion counts. I e-mailed him asking...













