Kate Brown And Ron Bersin
Keep the revolving door closed.
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?5 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 5 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
August 12th, 2009
Rep. Earl Blumenauer | Phoning it in.15 comments
August 5th, 2009
Brenda Sturdevant | Offended by a miniskirt.3 comments
![]() |
[January 14th, 2009]
Nothing attracts the Rogue Desk’s attention like a whiff of hypocrisy.
In 2007, the Legislature passed a sweeping ethics measure, Senate Bill 10, aimed at limiting lobbyists’ influence in Salem. The bill slashed limits on how much lobbyists could spend on meals for legislators, as well as cut entertaining and travel freebies.
And SB 10 imposed a strict “revolving door” limitation that prohibited ex-lawmakers from lobbying ex-colleagues for two years after leaving the Legislature.
This week’s Rogue, former Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown, recently sworn in as Oregon’s secretary of state, wrote the bill; her partner in Rogue-dom, Ethics Commission director Ron Bersin, has now decided to exempt her from it.
On Jan. 8, Bersin issued a puzzling opinion [PDF] that allows lobbying by Brown as well as former Senate colleagues Brad Avakian, the Bureau of Labor and Industries commissioner; and Ben Westlund, new state treasurer.
Bersin says because those elected officials aren’t paid for lobbying like a contract lobbyist, the statute written by Brown doesn’t apply to them.
That’s a stretch. The ex-lawmakers will use their legislative contacts to improve the fortunes of their new offices—exactly what the revolving door statute aims to prevent.
Bersin’s opinion treats these ex-lawmakers better than anybody else with business before the Legislature. And that is unfair.
“Public agencies aren’t supposed to have any more influence on legislation than anyone else,” says former legislative counsel Greg Chaimov, who as a private lawyer has sued to overturn parts of SB 10. “DEQ shouldn’t have any greater influence than Sierra Club or [the] Forest Industries Council.”
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Kate Brown And Ron Bersin”
And you call Brown and Bersin the Rogues of the Week? How about liar Sam?
What a bogus "Rogue!" You mean to tell me that you think it is unethical for a state-wide elected official to advocate for his or her department to the Legislature? It must have been a slo...
This is an utterly ridiculous "rogue" listing. Kate Brown is the Secretary of State of Oregon. She's GOT to be able to push issues at the legistlature. She can't do her job without it. Any l...
I don't believe the law does apply to statewide elected officials and, if it does, it is almost certainly unconstitutional.
The legislature cannot preclude the Secretary of State fr...












