Rev. E. William Beauchamp
Censorship isn’t a Christian value.
November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.6 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.25 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
October 21st, 2009
Michael Ruppert | Peak trouble for an Oregon author.23 comments
October 7th, 2009
Beaverton Police | Zero tolerance for video recorders.11 comments
September 30th, 2009
Lynn Peterson | C’mon, Dems. Are Kitzhaber and Bradbury that formidable?3 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Denny Doyle | Beaverton mayor hits a foul ball.3 comments
September 2nd, 2009
Oregon Bankers Association | For bailouts, then against them.6 comments
August 19th, 2009
Wal-Mart | Save money. Live worse.9 comments
![]() BEAUCHAMP IMAGE: up.edu |
[April 1st, 2009]
Writing a news story about suicide is one of many difficult tasks journalists face. Experts say media coverage can provoke “suicide contagion,” if the coverage glamorizes the death or offers too many details of the act.
It’s not entirely unreasonable, then, for the University of Portland’s administrators to want undergraduate reporters to write responsibly in the student paper about last month’s suicide of a well-liked senior. But UP president Rev. E. William Beauchamp took the Rogue route with his overbearing overreaction to The Beacon’s coverage.
As first reported March 30 on wweek.com, Beauchamp, who also serves as the newspaper’s publisher, ordered what was left of the 1,500 copies of the March 26 edition removed from campus newsstands just hours after publication. Students then had to remove the entire electronic edition from the paper’s website, upbeacon.net.
University spokeswoman Laurie Kelley called the story insensitive to the deceased student’s family because of its headline, “Suicide Claims UP Senior.”
Four days after the papers were pulled, the school let students repost their story online after they had changed the headline to “UP Mourns Tragic Loss.”
It wasn’t clear at WW press time whether they would be allowed to reprint the paper.
But Kelley offered additional explanations about the incident that suggest the answer is no and UP’s problem went deeper than the headline. “It wasn’t our news to break,” Kelley says. “It just isn’t who the University of Portland is. We really care about our students.”
The Rogue Desk doesn’t doubt that statement. But neither the story nor its original headline sensationalized what was legitimate news on the campus. And to pull the papers doesn’t show much care for those student journalists.
Suggestions for a Rogue? Submit them to rogue@wweek.com.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Rev. E. William Beauchamp”
Father Bill is by NO means a wildcard. He cares for the institution that he looks over. He engages in fireside chats with the student body, a new implementation into his want to get to know the studen...
UP is a private educational institution, and as such, it has the right to decide what is and is not suitable for its student newspapers. It is inappropriate for WW to chastise UP leadership for its d...
It is their right to censor if they want. However, as an EDUCATIONAL institution, it fails on some very high levels. If we are ruled by kings someday, than life at UP might prepare one for that, and t...
If UP is a Private Educational Institution, then can I conclude it doesnt get fed taxpayers money or state money..? I think it does, so there is nothing Private about it when public money is being sp...












