Logo
ISSUE #35.31 • NEWS •
[LEGISLATURE]

Minor Parties’ Major Roadblock


Why won’t Democratic leaders let two election reform bills come up for a vote?

Recently in "News"

February 3rd, 2010
Rogue of the Week • Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Paulson Shoots, Scores | The Timbers’ Owner closes a sweet ballpark deal, but doubts remain.4 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Sex And The City | Will gender reassignment surgery be a new city insurance benefit? 2 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Second Time Around | What the mayor will likely tout in his State of the City Speech. 0 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Hot Seat • Gov. Ted Kulongoski | Why the governor wants to deal with your kicker check in his last session.5 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Murmurs • Always Asking, Always Telling.1 comment

February 3rd, 2010
Dr. Know • Dr. Know1 comment

February 3rd, 2010
Letters to the Editor • Inbox3 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Cover Story • The Crusaders | Eight relentless watchdogs who hound public officials in pursuit of answers.45 comments

February 3rd, 2010
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.2 comments



IMAGE: Dennis Culver
BY NIGEL JAQUISS | njaquiss at wweek dot com

[June 10th, 2009]

Democratic legislative leaders have consigned two highly popular electoral reform bills to oblivion in the final days of the 2009 session.

The bills’ dormancy reveals two things: how ruthlessly D’s will protect their hard-won turf from minor parties and how keen the Oregon Education Association is to maintain the current system.

House Bill 2414 would allow general-election ballots to show candidates carrying the nomination of up to three parties, so that, say, a Democrat could also be endorsed by the Pacific Green Party or a Republican by the Libertarian Party.

Despite sailing through the House 53-7 on March 31, the so-called “fusion voting” measure is stuck in the Senate Rules Committee. There, committee chairman Sen. Richard Devlin (D-Tualatin) has declined to move the bill, although a bipartisan letter from 16 of Oregon’s 30 senators asked him to send the bill to the Senate floor for a vote.

The OEA says Devlin’s doing the right thing. “Our members are on record as opposing fusion voting,” says OEA spokeswoman Becca Uherbelau. “We think it would confuse voters and lead to slogan campaigns.”

Similarly, Senate Bill 326, which passed the Senate unanimously May 13, is stuck in the House Rules Committee. That bill would reverse 2005 legislation that has made it much harder for minor-party candidates to qualify for the ballot. That 2005 legislation prohibits any voter who votes in a major-party primary from signing a petition to qualify an independent candidate for the ballot.

Leaders of smaller parties say more than a half-million voters are disenfranchised by the current system because they can’t vote in Democratic and Republican primaries.

“About a quarter of Oregon voters are not registered with either major party,” notes Independent Party chairwoman Linda Williams, a Portland lawyer. “I think the public is interested in a greater opportunity for participation.”

And third-party members also say the current system could be strengthened by fusion voting (see “All That Fusion Jazz,” WW, June 6, 2007). That’s because major-party candidates would need to broaden their positions to include issues of interest to third parties. And ballots in fusion-voting states, such as New York, give voters more information about a candidate, says Barbara Dudley, chairwoman of the Oregon Working Families Party.

Spokespeople for Devlin, the Senate majority leader, and House Majority Leader Mary Nolan (D-Portland) say the two bills are simply lower priorities than addressing weightier issues and a gaping budget hole.















icon Story continues below

advertisement

advertisement

“We’re working on health care,” says Nolan spokesman Michael Cox. “I just don’t think [SB 326] is going anywhere.”

Sen. Rick Metsger (D-Welches), who sponsored SB 326, scoffs at that explanation.

“Baloney,” says Metsger, who lost in a three-way Democratic primary last year for Oregon secretary of state after the OEA and other unions endorsed eventual winner Kate Brown. “It takes one minute to open a work session and pass a bill to the floor. We’re still somehow finding time to pass bills on things like olive oil.” (The Senate on June 4 passed HB 2893, relating to olive oil labeling.)

Dudley says the fate of reform legislation shows Oregon Democrats aren’t interested in altering a system in which Democrat Ted Kulongoski has benefited in the past two governor’s races from Libertarian and Constitution Party candidates pulling significant percentages from the Republican nominee.

“The Democrats don’t want competition,” Dudley says. “And I think they also like having the Libertarian and Constitution Party act as spoilers.”

Although neither the Democratic Party of Oregon nor the OEA has testified publicly against either bill, the fingerprints of the party and the teachers union show up in more subtle ways.

On May 21, Trent Lutz, director of the Democratic Party of Oregon, wrote an email to Devlin saying, “While the Democratic Party of Oregon believes that we should always strive to increase participation in voting, no matter what your political affiliation might be, we believe HB 2414 could do more harm than good.”

Then, on May 29, 16 senators urged Devlin to bring HB 2414 up for a vote. “We see this as an important clarification of Oregon law that will bring more of Oregon’s 100,000 minor party members into the mainstream political process,” the senators wrote. “Please send this bill to the floor.”

Instead, Devlin has entertained a number of crippling amendments from lobbyists working with OEA, which, along with its affiliated groups, poured more than $10 million into Democratic coffers during the 2008 election cycle.

Uherbelau insists the issue is “not a high priority” for OEA, which wants lawmakers to focus on bigger issues.

The Independent Party’s Williams says that’s unfortunate. “We think voters would be served by a return to a more vibrant and robust tradition of minor parties and independent candidates.”

FACT: As of April, Oregon had 2.145 million registered voters. Of that total, 429,000 were not registered as Republicans or Democrats. And 101,000 were registered with minor parties.

 

Rate This Story
5 average/6 votes

 
read all 7 comments | add your comment
 

RECENT COMMENTS ON “Minor Parties’ Major Roadblock”

4

It would've been interesting to hear a political scientist's perspective in this article.

PSU Student, Jun 10th, 2009 4:26pm
5

Well, you good government reformers, what do you expect from the money-soaked Oregon Legislature? Oregon is one of only 2 states with no limits on political campaign contributions, now that Illinois ...

KneeJerk, Jun 10th, 2009 5:50pm
6

Thank you for this article.

/

As the only citizen to testify at the hearing in the Oregon Senate on SB 326, I found your coverage timely and important.

/

But Senator Devlin and fellow Democrat...

Seth Woolley, Jun 14th, 2009 11:26pm
7

Seth, I also testified in favor of SB 326 in the Senate Rules Committee. I did so in writing, because I could not be in Salem that day.

Dan Meek, Jun 29th, 2009 7:12pm
 
 
 




 

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55838) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55842) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55844) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=58781) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55843) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55841) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55839) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61

Warning: file_get_contents(http://portland.wweek.com/online/exports/Rss.xml?section=55840) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/wweekco/public_html/xml/rsscacher.php on line 61


More


More


More


More


More


More


More


More

Ad

Ad

Ad

Sponsored Links: WW Personals
Musician's Market
Snowboard Jackets
Legal Tips
Camping Gear


Recently in Willamette Week
December 31st 1969Washington State | The Canada of Oregon has it all—a Stonehenge replica, a longboarder's concrete wet dream and dark, damp underground lava caves. Vive les rocks.
December 31st 1969Oregon's Outer Edges | Crater Lake. Hell's Canyon. Wallowa and Steens mountain ranges. Hell, yeah.
December 31st 1969Central Oregon/High Desert | No rain, plenty of snow, obsidian flows and great local beer. The folks from the real eastside know how to unbend outside.
December 31st 1969Great Cascades/Columbia Gorge | With plenty of room to roam—and hot springs for your weary feet—it's the place to ramble and relax for the weekend.
December 31st 1969Willamette Valley | Monks, tracks, tubing and wine make the fertile strip a virile place to play.
December 31st 1969Stumptown | Tons of public parks, an extinct volcano and nude beach volleyball to keep you jolly. Get out and collect those merit badges, without leaving the city.
December 31st 1969The Coast | The beaches are public. You own them. Go play—hike in the old-growth forests.
December 31st 1969Cycle Tour 101: Your on-bike guide to Highway 101 | To ride the greatest bike route in Oregon, you need to get out of Portland.
December 31st 1969Doggin' It | What happens when a Portland running club jogs with pooches from the pound?
December 31st 1969Over the Edge | Sam Drevo will paddle yr ass.