Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Seth Grahame-Smith (and Jane Austen)
Jane Austen and zombies—so hot right now.
November 4th, 2009
The Opposite Field | A father and son connect by way of the summer game.0 comments
October 28th, 2009
Q & A • Jon Raymond | Of hot springs, lost dogs and the Oregon Trail.0 comments
October 21st, 2009
Jonathan Lethem Chronic City | Manhattan goes meta.0 comments
October 14th, 2009
R. Gregory Nokes Massacred For Gold | Anatomy of a (120-year-old) mass murder.0 comments
September 30th, 2009
David Byrne Bicycle Diaries | A Talking Head on two wheels around the world.0 comments
September 23rd, 2009
Jen Yates Cake Wrecks | The cakes are so wrong, but the blog is so right.0 comments
August 19th, 2009
Curtis Ebbesmeyer and Eric Scigliano, Flotsametrics and the Floating World | Of junks and shipping trunks.0 comments
August 5th, 2009
The Impostor’s Daughter Laurie Sandell | A daddy’s girl gets a rude awakening. And bad credit.0 comments
July 22nd, 2009
Jeff Johnson Tattoo Machine | The secret world of ink according to a local needle-slinger.0 comments
July 8th, 2009
Portland Queer | A new anthology keeps Portland predictable.16 comments
![]() |
[June 10th, 2009]
A 200-year-old drawing-room satirist brought Seth Grahame-Smith’s career back from the dead—or at least from the brink of obscurity. Last year, the author of The Spider-man Handbook collaborated with Jason Rekulak at Quirk Books to create Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (319 pages, $12.95), a wry mashup of Jane Austen’s Regency-era masterwork that pits the comely Bennet sisters’ advanced ninja skills against hordes of brains-hungry “unmentionables” roaming the Hertfordshire countryside. When word got out about the gory, gimmicky tome all hell broke loose and the book quickly reached No. 3 on the New York Times Best-Seller List. Grahame-Smith keeps around 85 percent of PP’s original text, which means Mr. Darcy’s and Miss Elizabeth Bennet’s decorous speeches now bristle with a loony sense of life-and-death urgency. Don’t worry—Lady Catherine de Bourgh is still a bitch. These days she’s just challenging Elizabeth to a fight to the death in the family dojo instead of forcing her to play the pianoforte. KELLY CLARKE.
WW : How’ve Austen fans reacted to the zombie invasion?
Seth Grahame-Smith: I was worried [they] were going to burn me in effigy. And [some] do—I call them the “How dare you, sir” crowd—they dismiss this as sacrilege.... But what’s strange is that so many of these “Jane-ites” have embraced [the book].
I think zombies actually improve Austen’s original book.
People who are much smarter than me have pointed out that the characters in Jane Austen’s original book are kind of like zombies in a way. They go about their daily lives worrying about gossip and which ball is when…and you get a sense the countryside could have been burning around them and they would have just carried on mindlessly in their bubble of immense wealth and privilege. The only thing I have really changed, thematically, is that the countryside is burning down around them....
I love the term “the unmentionables”—the idea that in polite society you don’t talk about those kind of…things.
No one ever says what they actually mean in mixed company [in Austen’s books]. I just wanted that to be the same thing in terms of the zombies. Here they are...ripping out your entrails and yet it’s still sort of frowned upon to use the “z” word.
To be honest, nobody expected your book to be any good.
Yeah, I know. All [I did] is give its themes and characters an injection of steroids so they are more accessible. The fact that this book is...a tool for introducing people to the world of Jane Austen, that is a ridiculous but pretty awesome side effect.
Any other classic mashups on the way?
I’m writing a book called Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.
If you were a zombie, who would you have eaten in PP?
Definitely Mrs. Bennet. She is insufferable.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Seth Grahame-Smith (and Jane Austen)”











