rectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrect

Site Navigator
Personals
Classified
How to Reach Us
Web Directory
News
Cover: Abortion
Cover Sidebar: stats
Newsbuzz
Crime & Justice
King-56 Follow-Up
Rogue of the Week
Scoreboard
Letters
Opinion:  State of the Guv
Voices Interviews
King-56 crash stories
Arts & Culture
CultureBuzz
Timbre: music column
Hip-hop: Wyclef Jean
Spins of the Week
Headout Music Calendar
Movie Reviews:
  
Undergound
  
Repulsion
General Events
Beer Column
Food/Drink Events
Restaurants

Archive
Home

Context:

By 1995, John Sosnovske, an alcoholic, had lost control of his faculties. After Jesperson's confession, police decided against administering a lie-detector test because Sosnovske said he didn't even know who Taunja Bennett was.

Picture

Keith Jesperson told a police detective last month that his confession "was a scam from day one."

Photo: CHARLES GULLUNG

Picture

About
Face
 
Keith Jesperson now says he didn't murder Taunja Bennett, implying that prosecutors let the real killers out of prison.

BY MAUREEN O'HAGAN, mohagan@wweek.com


Who killed Taunja Bennett? That question has dogged law enforcement officials since January 1990, when her badly beaten body was found not far from Crown Point Observatory in the Columbia Gorge.

Picture

What first seemed like a slam-dunk case has turned into a long-running nightmare for both police and prosecutors. "It's the case that wouldn't die," says Multnomah County Deputy District Attorney James J. McIntyre. The veteran prosecutor says he knows of no other case that has taken such twists and turns, and it took yet another one in recent weeks.

In 1991, armed with a detailed confession, McIntyre helped convict Laverne Pavlinac and John Sosnovske of Bennett's murder. But four years later, Keith Jesperson, a self-professed serial murderer, confessed to the killing. The media, including The Oregonian and Willamette Week, jumped to the defense of Pavlinac and Sosnovske ("Who's Guilty," WW, Oct. 11, 1995), and, in an extraordinary move, the pair of convicted killers was released from prison.

Now, Jesperson, known as the Happy Face Killer, says he was lying about Bennett's murder, and a separate case in Deschutes County has some law-enforcement officials suspecting that Pavlinac and Sosnovske were guilty after all.

After beginning his life term at Oregon State Penitentiary for the murder of Bennett and two other women, Jesperson began claiming responsibility for a fourth murder, that of Bobbi Crescenzi, who disappeared from Bend in October 1992. Although Crescenzi's husband, Jack, had already been convicted of the crime, Deschutes County Chief Deputy District Attorney Patrick Flaherty took Jesperson's confession seriously. "He convinced the Multnomah County DA that he committed a murder [of Taunja Bennett] that two people had been convicted for, so he was imbued with credibility," Flaherty told WW.

This time, however, officials were able to prove that Jesperson was lying. Last week, police arrested Wayne Coker, a former cellmate of both Jesperson's and Crescenzi's, on charges that he tampered with a witness. Coker, Flaherty says, had been relaying information on Bobbi Crescenzi's murder between her husband and Jesperson shortly before Jesperson first confessed to it in 1996.

The alleged deal was that Jesperson, who was already serving a life sentence, would take responsibility for the murder if Jack Crescenzi would pay Jesperson's children at least $10,000.

If Jesperson lied about killing Crescenzi, couldn't he have lied about killing Bennett? Last month, Flaherty told the Bend Bulletin that he thinks so. (Flaherty took political heat for that comment and refused to explicitly criticize the Multnomah County DA's office in his interview with WW.)

Jesperson, meanwhile, has recanted his confession. "I must tell you that I didn't kill Taunja Bennett," he wrote in a letter to Dateline NBC, which aired a segment on the Crescenzi case last month. "Now you know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

Oregon State Police Detective Alan Corson, who investigated the case from the beginning and had all along maintained that Sosnovske and Pavlinac were Bennett's real killers, jumped on the opportunity. Last month, while Jesperson was facing extradition to Wyoming to face murder charges, he raced to Oregon State Penitentiary to capture on tape Jesperson's recantation of the Bennett confession.

Picture

John Sosnovske spent almost five years in prison before being released. A judge ruled the conviction void, deciding that it was based on the lies of Laverne Pavlinac. Pavlinac was also released from prison, although a judge let her conviction stand.

Corson didn't return WW's phone call, but, like Flaherty, he has been criticized for taking this step without consulting the others involved.

McIntyre remains convinced that Jesperson killed Bennett. He says he became convinced they had the wrong people behind bars after Jesperson led them to the contents of Bennett's purse--including her Oregon picture ID card--which he said he had tossed into the brush off a small road near the Sandy River. Pavlinac was unable to do this in 1990, when she was so intent on confessing to the crime that she manufactured evidence in order to implicate Sosnovske, her boyfriend. "If Pavlinac would have known where that purse was in 1990, she would have given it to us," McIntyre says.

Retired Multnomah County Sheriff's Detective John Ingram, who investigated the case with Corson, isn't quite as convinced as McIntyre but still leans toward believing Jesperson is the killer. "It's a mixed-up affair," he says. "As far as Jesperson and his truthfulness, it makes you wonder all the way back. It makes you wonder whether he's telling the truth about Taunja Bennett.

"I think about this case almost every day," Ingram says. "Sometimes I'll think Pavlinac and Sosnovske had to have done it.... [But] Jesperson is the most likely candidate and his story is much more believable."

So what motive would Jesperson have for claiming his innocence now? McIntyre offers one scenario: Jesperson is accused of a murder in Wyoming, for which he faces the death penalty. McIntyre says that by minimizing his past wrongdoing, Jesperson might make a jury less likely to seek the death penalty. In addition, by raising doubts about past confessions in Oregon, he could be trying to delay his extradition to Wyoming.

"I think that's why all this is happening now," McIntyre says. "It's actually a beautiful ploy on his part."

 

ÿ