file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Advertiser

 

NEWS STORY


No Hit, No Error
Thanks to old-fashioned police work, the Forest Park murder suspect was apprehended in near-record time. But could modern technology have nabbed him even quicker?


BY MAUREEN O'HAGAN
mohagan@wweek.com

 

Profiles of Oregon prisoners' DNA are developed from blood or saliva samples.

 

 

This year, the Legislature expanded the DNA-sample requirements to include people convicted of assault and burglary.

 

 

The state crime lab has produced only a few "cold hits" since 1991. With the expanded DNA sample laws and the newer PCR method, however, officials expect to get more in the future.

 

 

 

 

Todd Allen Reed's DNA has been in a state police database for seven years.

 

 

When Todd Allen Reed was arraigned last week in the deaths of three women found in Forest Park, the public let out a collective sigh of relief. Some serial killers have eluded the police for years--if not forever--yet the Portland Police Bureau seems to have solved this mystery in just eight weeks.

"Can you think of any other serial case [where an arrest was made] in six weeks?" asks Detective Sergeant Cheryl Kanzler. "I can't."

More amazing, perhaps, is that the case could have been wrapped up even sooner if authorities had more up-to-date scientific methods available. Despite round-the-clock detective work, there's a chance--in theory, at least--that Reed could have been arrested weeks earlier.

On May 7, police found the body of a woman in Forest Park. The next day, they found another. Although they didn't say so at the time, police recently revealed they found a used condom near one victim's body.

That provided the first--and perhaps best--clue to the suspected killer's identity. Authorities won't say exactly how they handled this case, but normally, when police don't have an immediate suspect in a case, they examine clues (such as the semen in the found condom) to develop a profile of the suspect's DNA. That profile is then compared against a vast computerized database of 11,500 other DNA profiles gathered from people convicted of murder, rape and promoting prostitution in Oregon since 1991. If the suspect's DNA matches any of those in the database, there's an extremely good chance that they belong to the same person.

When investigators get a match in such circumstances, that's called a "cold hit"--a jackpot, to be sure, but one that was a distinct possibility in this case. Reed's DNA had been on file in the database since 1992, when he was convicted of attempted rape.

But that's not how Reed was caught. Instead, police first identified Reed through a July 7 undercover prostitution sting. It was only after Reed was identified through the sting that they compared his 1992 DNA sample to a sample from the condom.

From the date investigators found the condom to the date of Reed's arrest, more than two months passed--a stretch of time in which a third body was found in Forest Park.

So why didn't authorities get a cold hit the first time around? According to Ray Grimsbo, a private forensic investigator who used to work in the state police crime lab, the state is behind the times.

In the 1980s, law enforcement officials around the country began using a DNA analysis process called RFLP. "That's the old classic DNA fingerprinting," explains Beth Carpenter, a state crime lab supervisor. The RFLP system has a couple of drawbacks, Grimsbo and Carpenter agree. It requires a relatively large sample--say, a blood spatter the size of a dime--and takes weeks to get results.

No one is criticizing Oregon for going down the path it did. Many states adopted the RFLP method, but technology quickly progressed beyond RFLP's capabilities.

Around 1992, Grimsbo was already using another DNA analysis method, called PCR, in his private lab in Northwest Portland. With the PCR method, he says, the sample can be as small as a pinhead. Plus, results come in days instead of weeks.

"It's a far superior technology," Carpenter says. "[PCR] is here to stay for a long time. It's a very robust, fantastic system."

Unfortunately, Oregon is a long way down the RFLP path, and its data cannot be used with the PCR technology. That's because RFLP profiles look similar to bar codes, while PCR profiles rely on color coding. "It's like comparing English to Japanese," Carpenter says. Most states now use the PCR method, although many old databases, including the FBI's, still haven't been converted to PCR.

Right now, the state crime lab is switching to the PCR format. That means it has to retest all of the old DNA samples it has kept on file, then re-enter the results into the new database. The process is so time-consuming that the state is considering contracting with a private lab for help. The task will take at least a year to complete.

Had the state started out using the PCR method, Grimsbo believes, "they would have known if they had a 99 percent hit inside of two days" on the DNA sample from the Forest Park condom.

Carpenter says it's not always that simple, although state forensics officials theoretically could have come up with a preliminary cold hit in a week or so, then passed that information on to Portland officers while the results were being verified.

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published July 28, 1999

file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Full%20Sail%20Brewing file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Portland%20Travel%20Specials! For Movie Times and Locations, See our new MovieLink site!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news