file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Advertiser

 


NEWS STORY

It's the Forest, Stupid!
In the fascination over how Tre Arrow tooka dump in public view,it was easy to forget that the Eagle Creek timber sales fight is about protecting trees and water.



BY PATTY WENTZ
pwentz@wweek.com

photo by Basil Childers

 

 


More than 100 timber sales on the West Coast have been put on hold by the courts because the Forest Service didn't meet the requirements of the Northwest Forest Plan.

 

 

 

 

On Monday,
environmentalists turned in 700,000 comments
supporting the Clinton roadless area plan.

 

 

It's about 60 miles from the Donald Duncan building in downtown Portland to a 500-year-old Douglas fir called Sunset in the Mount Hood National Forest. But for the past 16 months, two to five people have been living on platforms in that and another nearby tree to protest the same timber sales that transformed Tre Arrow from an obscure rock climber into an environmental rock star.

With Arrow (a.k.a. Michael J. Scarpitti) voluntarily grounded, the action is headed back to the forest. This Sunday, Cascadia Forest Alliance is holding a "Closure Crossing" at noon--a planned violation of the July 7 Forest Service order barring public access to portions of the Eagle Creek timber sales.

"The reason we're forced to used nonviolent, civil-disobedience direct action is because all other legal avenues have been eliminated," says Donald Fontenot of CFA. "This is the last thing
we can do."

Ever since the sales, which comprise 1,030 acres, were proposed, environmentalists have called them illegal, claiming the scope and methods violate environmental laws. But the Forest Service has deemed them perfect examples of the Northwest Forest Plan at work. It's difficult to know who is correct: There are no outside audits of timber sales, and the traditional check on the agency--a lawsuit--is not available at Eagle, because the sale is part of the 1995 Salvage Rider, which makes it immune from a legal challenge. The result--according to Cascadia Forest Alliance, the Oregon Natural Resource Council, the Sierra Club and other green groups--is a sale that breaks the rules. Even the logging company, Vanport Manufacturing, has criticized the Forest Service for scheduling heavy logging in some of the areas, pointing out that a cut done two years ago caused a massive blowdown in surrounding trees, which increased the fire and insect infestation risk. Other environmental concerns include:

1. Water: Eagle Creek originates in the Salmon Huckleberry Wilderness area, and the south fork passes through the Eagle sale area before hooking up with the Clackamas River, which sends water to the taps of the 185,000 people in West Linn, Lake Oswego and Oregon City. All three cities have asked the Forest Service to be careful with their watershed. The Forest Service claims it has been, and the tests done after the winter of 1999 on Eagle Creek found that the water quality was the highest of any watershed in the Clackamas Basin. Environmentalists say that's not relevant because there were no tests done before the logging started. Besides, says Jeremy Hall of the Oregon Natural Resource Council, before the 1996 flood that sent sediment rushing downhill into the drinking water for the city of Salem, the Forest Service said logging in the Santiam River watershed would not threaten water quality either.

2. Roads: About 600 acres of the Eagle site was inventoried as roadless national forest. Still, while Bill Clinton tries to get his green card stamped by cutting back on road building, the larger debate is whether logging should be allowed in those pristine areas at all. Either way, Eagle will not qualify for protection because the timber has already been sold. Still, according to the sales plan, the Forest Service will not be building roads there. The 14 million board feet in the roadless area, or approximately 2,800 logging trucks' worth, will be taken out by helicopter. "I think we're already meeting the spirit of the roadless area," says Glen Satchet, spokesman for the Forest Service.

3. Critters: In 1996, when the Eagle sales were approved, the Forest Service's environmental-impact statement included surveys for the red tree vole, spotted owls, bats, and some mushrooms and fungi. Environmentalists say that since then, the scope of the surveys has been expanded to include more species and there should be a supplemental environmental impact statement done. Also, Hall says, the Forest Service has done such a sketchy job on the Eagle surveying that if it weren't for the salvage rider, they say, logging would have been halted along with the rest of the western sales.

The Forest Service denies that. "These sales were planned through an environmental-impact statement with full public disclosure and involvement," says Satchet. "They were planned to meet all the standards and laws of the Northwest Forest Plan."

4. Trees: Eagle Creek is not technically an old-growth forest because a forest fire swept through the area about 120 years ago. But pockets of the woods were not wiped out by the flames, and those groves have trees up to 500 years old. The Forest Service says it will not be cutting anything older than 200 years old, but environmentalists say that isn't true. Fontenot claims what happens on the ground doesn't match the Forest Service statements, and he's seen old-growth trees get wiped out at Eagle. The best solution, he says, is for Eagle to be folded into the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness Area, which it buttresses, so it would have a chance to become old-growth on its own.

 

file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Portland%20Travel%20Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news