|

WW
welcomes
letters to the editor via mail, e-mail
or fax. Letters must be signed by the author and include
the author's street address and phone number for verification.
Preference will be given to letters of 250 words or less.
Win-Win
Situation
"Will they or won't they?"
That was the question in my mind as I turned to the WW
Scorecard [April 28, 1999]
to see how WW would characterize the Powell's Books
union election last week. Sure enough, WW met my
lowered expectations and, following the lead of The Oregonian,
framed it as a negative:
Mike Powell--loser
Wrong.
Mike Powell--winner. Mike Powell's employees--winners.
Powell's Books--winner. Powell's customers--winners.
Portland--winner.
The unionization of Powell's Books was as much about preserving
the store's culture and sales-staff professionalism as it
was about money. Michael Powell didn't have a union "problem"
until he gutted the knowledge-center sales structure of
the stores' departments. Employees whose talents, experience
and leadership are valued and utilized by their employer
approach their jobs with a high degree of personal pride.
Take that away--that one priceless component of employee
compensation--and morale sinks and the business itself suffers.
Powell a loser? Hardly. It was a close call, but Portland
and Powell's escaped intact.
By the way, Michael Powell--described as a good Democrat,
champion of liberal causes and civic leader--should be proud
of his newfound affiliation with the International Longshore
and Warehouse Union. It couldn't fit his politics more neatly.
Few other unions operate with such a strong sense of fairness
and social justice. Never mind that the ILWU's officers'
salaries are no higher than its rank-and-file members',
or that the ILWU shut down West Coast ports last Saturday
in support of the call for a new trial for Mumia Abu-Jamal
(didn't see mention of that in WW), or the myriad
other local, national and global causes the ILWU supports--all
of which seem to go unrecognized by the mainstream media.
Instead, here's a pop quiz for WW's reporting staff:
Which human rights activist, the execution of whom at the
hands of his own government was stopped by the ILWU's direct
intervention, went on to become president of that same country
two decades later?
The answer to that should go in next week's Winners column--right
below Michael Powell.
Kenneth B. Shirk
Secretary-Treasurer
Portland Musicians Union
Much
Ado...
Steffen Silvis' pretentious review of the
Tygres Heart production of Much Ado About Nothing
seems a bit topsy-turvy ["Love's
Laborers Lost," WW, April 28, 1999]. He criticizes
the production for being entertaining, rather than serious
or substantive.
Perhaps he forgot that Much Ado About Nothing is
not a serious or substantive play; it's a comedy. The play
doesn't solve the world's problems or delve deep into the
human psyche. What it does is make us laugh. It is entertainment.
That is a compliment, not a criticism.
Shakespeare's plays are about nothing if not entertainment.
He did not write them for the pointy-headed intellectual
elite. Instead, he wrote them for the masses. He wrote them
to entertain. And this play does just that. Delightfully
so. For Mr. Silvis to say that the wit in this play "degenerates
into a romp" is most certainly a mischaracterization. The
wit in this play is a romp. A wonderfully funny romp.
This production is guaranteed to make you laugh and to entertain.
It is not to be missed.
Professor M. H. Sam Jacobson
Willamette University College of Law
All
Front
This in response to H.V. Claytor Jr.'s sadly
misguided article "Hip-Hop,
You Don't Stop" featured in the May 5 issue of WW.
Certainly support of the Portland hip-hop scene in this
strangely segregated city is welcomed; however, Monsieur
Claytor's comparison of apples and hand grenades was ridiculous
and grossly inappropriate. No doubt the high-gloss antics
of superstars Jay-Z, Method Man, Redman and DMX were an
excitement and an opportunity for unification, but such
pyrotechnics and dangling from wires, however skilled, present
only so much strange fruit in the face of hip-hop's apparently
forgotten roots: the underground. Eternal Golden Void is
a powerful force in the burgeoning vanguard of underground
beat culture (not just hip-hop neither). The event at Tiger
Bar on April 19 admittedly may not have been the ultimate
beat event, but nor was it attempting such. The event
was an informal, small, free affair to celebrate
the release of EGV's second record. And since which fascist
hip-hop dictatorship is it a crime to be peculiar, or even
a slow scratcher? If hip-hop is supposed to be all speed
and no atmosphere and no subtle invention, well, it sounds
to me like hip-hop is dead! Beat heads know better than
to rely exclusively on glitz, and I suspect that all the
kids fronting to be music journalists are going to be exposed
and flipped like pancakes. So, Mistah Claytor, put your
pen in the air and wave it round like you just don't care.
The rest of us will progress just fine without you.
Elsa Teicher
Southeast 14th Avenue
School-Reform
Success Story
Your article on school reform ["None
of the Above, " May 12, 1999] fails to consider where
school reform has been successful.
I serve on the school board for the West Linn-Wilsonville
School District. From that perspective, I see school reform
as a crucial factor in accelerating school curriculum statewide
by establishing rigorous benchmarks for what is expected
from our schools. As an example, because of school reform,
our district now offers first-year algebra and geometry
to all middle schoolers ready for those classes.
To meet the demand of the Certificate of Initial Mastery
(CIM), our district has also revised our science curriculum,
moving some programs to the middle school that used to be
offered at the high-school level.
Because of CIM requirements, we expanded foreign-language
offerings at the middle-school level for this school year.
Our discussions about foreign language, moreover, provide
a keen insight into how school reform drives improvement
and how lack of funding undercuts that drive. Just this
past week, our school board postponed a meeting to address
the addition of foreign languages into our primary-school
curriculum. One reason for this postponement is that the
state recently announced a delay in implementing the foreign-language
element of the CIM. Also, our district is not likely to
have funds to add primary-level foreign languages in this
biennium (even at a $4.95 billion statewide funding level).
As for testing, from my perspective as a school board member,
tests provide a powerful tool to see what we, our district
and individual schools are (or are not) accomplishing. "Disaggregated"
test data can also be used to focus on individual student
needs.
Yes, there are problems. There always are when changing
a system. Perhaps we are overtesting, and it may be time
to rethink which tests are useful and affordable. But please,
we should not destroy what is a good, sound and effective
concept at its heart.
Jeffrey P. Chicoine
West Linn
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Willamette Week | originally
published May 19, 1999
|