rectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrectrect
Picture

Site Navigator
Personals
Classified
How to Reach Us
Web Directory
Cool Sites of the Week
Archive
News:
Cover: Endorsements

NewsBuzz
Murmurs: Pols on Parade
Rogue of the Week
Winners/Losers
Letters
King-56 crash stories
Arts & Culture:
Shinola: Things We Like
Beer: Nor’Wester
General Events
Food/Drink Events
Restaurants
Music:
Timbre: music column
Music Calendar
Capsule Reviews
Rock: Red Monkey
Movies:
Capsule Reviews
The Butcher Boy
He Got Game
Performance:
Listings
Stage: Blood Brothers
Books:
Listings
Photographer’s Portfolio:
Michael Olfert

Home

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Taking Initiative

While voters fill out mail ballots this week, two powerful conservatives begin a court battle in Multnomah County that may tear apart the coalition of those who have tried to jerk Oregon rightward using the initiative process.

Picture

The suit reaches back to 1994 and 1996, when Loren Parks, a reclusive manufacturer of medical supplies, hired Ruth Bendl, a well-known signature gatherer, to collect signatures for his initiatives on everything from requiring a double majority in elections on money matters to raising the retirement age for public employees.

In August 1996, Parks fired Bendl, accusing her of diverting his money to fund the signature-gathering effort of Gordon Miller, a Salem ophthalmologist who was seeking mandatory statewide school testing and two other measures. Bendl filed suit in Multnomah County for back wages. In 1997, Parks countersued, claiming that Bendl defamed him by telling Assistant District Attorney Norm Frink that Parks had "laundered" money to support conservative issues. Bendl then sued Parks for defamation based on the accusations about the Miller campaign.

The trial is expected to last less than a week and may feature testimony from some of this state's biggest players in the initiative game, including Don McIntire and Kevin Mannix. --Patty Wentz

Singing Soprano

It sounds almost hackneyed: a Grant High School choir boy is suspected of armed robbery.

Ethan Thrower, an 18-year-old senior and a member of the school choir, was charged last month with 10 counts of robbery stemming from an incident last year. Police say he and another man entered Rustica, a Northeast Broadway restaurant, the evening of Nov. 15. Wearing ski masks, they waved guns and ordered customers and employees to give up their money. They made off in a Chevy Suburban with $454.

Later that night, police responded to a call regarding a shooting. According to court documents, Thrower accidentally shot himself in the scrotum. Police were able to match the DNA found in the Suburban with Thrower's DNA, linking him with the crime.

According to court documents, Thrower had been accepted to Wesleyan University. Last week, members of the Grant High choir wore blue ribbons at his custody hearing to show their support. Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge Roosevelt Robinson has not yet decided whether to release Thrower pending trial.

 --Maureen O'Hagan

Follow-up
Electric Switch

First they said they weren't. Then they said they were. Then they said they weren't. Now Enron's managers have settled on the decisive "we're reevaluating."

At question last week was Enron's commitment to pitching its energy package to residential customers.

Enron bought PGE last year for $3.2 billion. The purchase was part of Enron's national effort to promote energy deregulation. By purchasing PGE, Enron took control of a local monopoly, which it said it would use to set the stage for competition. Late last year Enron set up a free-market pilot project in which it would compete with PGE, and any other energy providers, for traditionally captive customers in order to demonstrate the viability of electric utility deregulation.

Last week Willamette Week reported that the Houston-based energy company was going to stop seeking new customers in the free-market pilot project ("Enron Unplugged," WW, April 29, 1998), which began in four Oregon cities last December.

After the article ran, the company changed its mind.

"Enron is going to compete," spokesman Gary Foster says. "We are still going to have an offer out there."

At the same time, Foster acknowledges that Enron isn't quite sure how aggressive its marketing will be.

"We have not decided what we're going to do. We're reevaluating the marketing side of things," Foster says. "We don't publicly reveal what our marketing strategy will be."

Not terribly convincing for a $13.2 billion company that said it would spend up to $200 million on advertising the virtues of deregulation and has already reportedly spent $25 million running TV spots and full-page newspaper ads around the country.

Last winter Enron used direct-mail marketing and some cable advertising spots to promote the Hillsboro, Oregon City, St. Helens and Sandy pilot project. By mid-April, Enron had signed up about 2,600 of the four cities' 48,000 potential pilot-project customers.

Electric Lite, a small South Carolina-based energy company that's also participating in the pilot, has outpaced Enron with a scrappy, grass-roots marketing campaign around "green" power, grabbing up 3,600 customers so far.

"[Enron's hesitancy] is good for us," says Electric Lite GM Jan Burreson. "It leaves us with more customers. You have to respect Enron's realization that this [the residential market] isn't their niche."

Burreson's coy commentary may be misleading. When a giant like Enron starts wavering on the viability of actively marketing a product (the company pulled out of California's deregulated market last week and says it's currently reevaluating its involvement in pilot projects in Ohio and Massachusetts) it could be time to wonder if you're in the right business yourself.

Burreson masks any concerns she may have. "This pilot is the most successful in the country, with highest percentage of customers [13 percent] choosing a competitor over the incumbent," she says.

 --Josh Feit

 

Originally published: Willamette Week - May 6, 1998

ÿ