Advertiser

 


PREVIEWS
Poor Richard
What if Richard III found himself plopped into our Civil War? What if Ben Franklin lived in San Fran? Two productions play games with history.


BY STEFFEN SILVIS
243-2122


Richard III
Stark Raving Theater at Theater! Theatre!
3430 SE Belmont St., 232-7072
7:30 pm Thursdays-Saturdays, 4 pm Sundays
Opens April 14 $13.50-$15

Ben Franklin: Unplugged
Portland Institute for Contemporary Art at the Hollywood Theater
4036 NE Sandy Blvd., 242-1419
8 pm Friday-Saturday, April 14-15
$13-$16


Richard III is Stark Raving's second go at Shakespeare; the company produced Titus Andronicus in 1990.

Stark Raving plans to produced Tourneur's The Revenger's Tragedy next season.

Joining Demke on stage will be Stark Raving company members Steve Boss, Jim Davis and Phil Navallo. Former Tygres Heart regulars Eric Newsome, Brian Russell and Casy Brown are also in the cast, as well as Deirdre Atkinson, Trish Egan and Megan Harris.

Author Harry Turtledove has explored fantastic alternate histories of the Civil War and World War II in books like Alternate Generals and Darkness Descending.


History always belongs to the victors, and the tales they tell are like talismanic devices, warding off the troubling "ifs" of an alternative ending. What if Hitler had invaded England? What if Napoleon had won at Waterloo? What if Richard III had survived Bosworth Field?

Richard III makes a convenient spook in the fancy-dress wardrobe of English history, a demonic, blood-drenched murderer, misshapen both in mind and body. What if the Tudors and Lancasters had lost the Wars of the Roses? Who knows what crimes would've been committed by this hunchbacked toad, this bottled spider?

That's the Tudor story anyway--ideal for scaring children before bedtime, but otherwise suspect. Still, in their attempt to legitimize their rise to the throne, the Tudors inspired some wondrous tales of the satanic head of the York tribe.

Shakespeare's Richard III is one of the great cruel clowns of the theater. In fact, there's so much wit and evil glee invested in Richard that Shakespeare could dispense with the fools, drunks and rubes who usually inhabit the fringes of his drama. Richard is a monster, but unlike other accounts (the most fanciful claiming that he lay in his mother's womb for two years before shoving out with a full set of teeth and hair) Shakespeare suggests that Richard was manufactured.

"He is a creature of chaos, but he was born and bred to be bloody," says Doug Miller, director of Stark Raving Theater's new production of Richard III. "Killing is what he did well."

Miller's production will stress the process by which Richard became an engine of destruction. "He was doing what everyone else at that time was doing," says Miller. "Everybody was steeped in blood."

The idea is that once activated for war, Richard could not easily switch to the tempers of peacetime, something he's quite aware of in the play. So what's a killing machine to do?

Miller and Stark Raving's artistic director, Dave Demke, have discovered some sympathy for Richard. Yes, he remains the quirt-tongued dissembler, but can he not have ulterior motives for fomenting unrest? Could he, perhaps, be struggling toward the creation of a new, albeit costly, peace? "War is hell," a disgusted Sherman said after making Georgia an inferno. Perhaps this same dichotomy exists in Richard.

In addition to drawing out often-unseen subtleties in Richard, Demke's chosen to emphasize women's roles, something modern productions of the piece usually trim away. "There's a constant presence of grief in this play," says Demke--an element often tragically downplayed by directors.

In many ways, the Wars of the Roses resemble our own Civil War in the degree of horror and in the grim spectacle of brothers killing brothers. Miller and Demke, who will play Richard, have decided to set the action in 1860s America, with the triumphant Northern House of York in blue, and the vanquished Lancasters in gray. There may be some confusion at the end, when the gray-clad forces opposed to Richard are victorious (happily led by a man named Richmond). But, what if...?

When poor Richard III passed a looking glass, he always met animal associations: hedgehog, hellhound, rooting hog. When famed San Francisco monologist Josh Korn-bluth crossed a mirror's path one day, he was struck by how much he looked like Benjamin Franklin. Just to verify his discovery, he went to a Wells Fargo bank and asked a teller for her opinion. After scrutinizing a $100 bill, it was decided that Kornbluth was indeed a ringer for the founding father.

Kornbluth was inspired to take the stage as a monologist after seeing one of Spalding Gray's pieces. He quickly gained a name for himself as a hilarious ransacker of his own life with pieces like Josh Kornbluth's Daily World (about being raised by communist parents), Haiku Tunnel (the vagaries of a temp life) and Moisture Seekers (ah, sex).

In exploring the life of Franklin, Kornbluth discovered the famous autobiography, which is itself a type of monologue. Franklin's relationship with his son also led Kornbluth into analyzing his relationship with his own revolutionary father. The result is Ben Franklin: Unplugged, a frank and funny monologue.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published April 12, 2000

Portland Travel Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news search site play dish screen visual arts music performance feature