
Seen
a Rogue on the loose?
Get in touch with our Roguemeister:
JOHN SCHRAG
jschrag@wweek.com
(503) 243-2122
FAX:
(503) 243-1115
The word "outrageous" is overused, but if ever anyone should
be outraged, it's the people of this city, who were ripped
off by this week's offenders, Sgts. Richard Barton and
Bradford Bailey--and their bosses, Police Chief Mark
Kroeker and Mayor Vera Katz.
The Barton and Bailey circus drew public attention last
year when the two officers surfaced in the $165,000 overtime
scam ("Breaking Ranks," WW, Aug. 18, 1999). Last
August, within days of being notified that they faced termination
for approving bogus overtime, both men filed stress-related
disability claims. Last week, the police and fireman's pension
board voted to grant their claims, even though the "stressful
events" happened eight years ago. Both officers presented
doctors' opinions that they were suffering from post-traumatic
stress syndrome, which may be true, but the timing of the
filing of their claims defies credulity. The claims are
a disgrace to every honest cop in the city.
As for the other two rogues, it's important to understand
that the police and fire pension board consists of 11 city
employees, including the police chief and the mayor. The
new top cop, Kroeker, missed the vote, his spokesman says,
because he was on a cruise celebrating his 35th wedding
anniversary.
With all due respect to Mrs. Kroeker, that's a bogus excuse.
If Chief Kroeker can't understand how symbolically important
his vote last week would have been to restoring public confidence,
we may soon be waxing nostalgic about Charles Moose. It's
not like Kroeker didn't know what he was missing--Susan
Dobrof, counsel to the pension board, says the agenda is
circulated at least a week in advance. And, Dobrof says,
there's nothing to prevent Kroeker from asking for an agenda
item to be held over to the next meeting.
Katz has criticized the vote, but she too skipped the meeting,
for a funeral. She has noted, in defending her absence,
that she only gets to vote in case of a tie. That's another
bogus excuse, and a potentially damning one: How could she
have known the outcome in advance? Katz could have sent
a proxy, as she has in the past, to at least voice her opposition.
And, like Kroeker, she could have asked that the vote be
postponed so she could have weighed in at the meeting--instead
of in The Oregonian the next day.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Willamette Week | originally
published March 22,
2000
|