
Seen
a Rogue on the loose?
Get in touch with our Roguemeister:
JOHN SCHRAG
jschrag@wweek.com
(503) 243-2122
FAX:
(503) 243-1115
When Intel calls, Sen. Ron Wyden listens--and consumer
groups get snubbed.
That was the story out of Washington, D.C., last week,
according to a story in The Hill, a weekly publication
that covers events in Congress. Since then, consumer advocates
say, little has changed: Wyden is still carrying water for
big business, and his staff has still not met with leading
consumer groups.
Wyden came under fire from groups such as Public Citizen
for supporting a Republican bill that aims to shield companies
from liability should their computers be plagued by Y2K
problems.
The Y2K problem could bite consumers in a host of ways,
says Sally Greenberg, senior counsel with Consumers
Union, the nonprofit group that publishes Consumer
Reports. For instance, they might spend lots of money
on bad software and then find it very difficult (under the
Wyden-backed bill) to sue the company that sold the flawed
product.
Consumer advocates believe Wyden was pressured by high-tech
titans including Intel, one of Oregon's largest employers.
An Intel official and Wyden's chief of staff confirmed in
The Hill that the senator was heavily lobbied. Federal
election records show Wyden received more than $418,000
from the communications and electronics industry in 1998.
Consumer groups, who generally give Wyden high marks, are
particularly irked because he didn't consult with them before
casting his vote with the GOP. They are almost as disappointed
by Wyden's response. In a memo issued last week, Wyden called
the criticism "highly inaccurate" and suggested the groups
were acting at the behest of trial lawyers, not consumers.
Greenberg was dismayed. "We are independent of any group,"
she says. "We don't take money from anyone, except from
our 4.5 million subscribers. My bottom line is that the
bill sets up impossible burdens of proof and makes it impossible
for the little guy to prevail in court."
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Willamette Week | originally
published May 5, 1999
|