Advertiser






Screen

REVIEW

Unamused
In The Muse, Albert Brooks plays a screenwriter who's lost his edge. It's easy to see where he got his inspiration for this one.

BY DAVE McCOY
dmccoy@wweek.com


The Muse
Rated PG-13
Opens Friday, Aug. 27
Hollywood screenwriter Steven Phillips (Albert Brooks) has a problem. Although he has 17 screenplays and one Oscar nomination to his credit, and despite having recently received the "Humanitarian Award" (an award "given to anyone who doesn't win the Oscar"), the overwhelming consensus in Tinseltown is that Phillips has lost his edge. His agent thinks so, his colleagues think so and, even worse, the studios think so. A smarmy Paramount executive (despicably played by Mark Feuerstein) not only turns Phillips' latest action script down but also terminates his three-picture deal. "Possibly writing is something you shouldn't do any more," he says. Under the circumstances, this conflict is ironic. With his latest comedy, The Muse, writer-director Albert Brooks seems to be in the same position as the protagonist he plays: He, too, has temporarily lost his edge.

Brooks truly understands comedy as a concept. He realizes that some of life's funniest moments often derive from pain and anguish, and his best films are built on that foundation. The situations in Lost in America, Real Life and Modern Romance are definitely humorous, but they're also bleak, packed with excruciating neuroses and, sometimes, uncomfortable to watch. Like Woody Allen, Brooks makes films that are amusing but feel like one long therapy session, with the comedian playing a loose variation on the same whiny, self-deprecating character in each picture. Unfortunately, sometimes Brooks' concepts read funnier on paper than on screen (see Defending Your Life, one of his weaker films) and his one-note character doesn't always engage the audience. These are just two of the reasons why The Muse is the writer-director's first failure in 20 years.

As in all of Brooks' comedies, The Muse attempts to solve its central conflict with a wonderfully inventive premise. With no job and a bad case of writer's block ("You remember the guy in The Shining?," he asks his wife. "Well, I'm jealous of that!"), Phillips turns to a flourishing colleague for advice. Jack Warrick (an overtanned, dead-on Jeff Bridges) tells Steven the secret of his success: He's been working with a woman named Sarah (Sharon Stone), who claims to be a real life muse, one of the original daughters of Zeus. Desperate and looking for any help, Phillips buys it and eventually convinces Sarah to take him on as a client. After all, she helped "inspire" hits like The Truman Show, and has folks like Martin Scorsese and James Cameron popping up on her doorstep for guidance. Of course, nothing is without strings in a Brooks film, and Sarah comes with numerous hangups. She's obnoxious, high-maintenance and expects her new clients to pay for all of her expenses. Soon, she's bunking in Phillips' own bedroom. Meanwhile our frustrated writer can't come up with a third act to finish the screenplay Sarah has inspired (more irony, since The Muse's third act is dreadful and silly).

Brooks often populates his films with incredibly irritating characters (Julie Hagerty's Linda in Lost in America, Debbie Reynolds' role as Mother), and Sarah is no exception. She's a walking headache, driving Phillips--and us--crazy. The problem is that Brooks' characters usually work as a counterpoint to the insanity. Though he's egotistical and neurotic, the audience can relate to his problems--and laugh at them. Here, however, Stephen Phillips is bland, shallow and as unengaging as every other character. Without a point of sympathetic reference, The Muse gives its audience absolutely no one to care about.

But, for all its faults, The Muse's main problem is its subject matter. Brooks is strongest when he drolly dissects universal problems. He's able to take everyday angst (say, the matriarchal suffocation in Mother) and develop an entire film around it. Here, he take shots at the most worn out target there is (besides teenagers): Hollywood. Really, is there a more tired subject than filmmakers making movies about how awful it is to make movies? Sure, Brooks adds a new twist with the muse angle, but otherwise every Hollywood joke has been told and every bitter statement has been made, and often in more enlightening ways. Barton Fink tackled screenwriter's block, while The Player and Contempt nailed Hollywood for its cheap superficiality years ago. While hardly devoid of laughter, The Muse aims low and easy, relying on pithy one-liners rather than fully developed comic sequences. For the first time, the comedian looks uninspired.

There's also something unsettling about watching Brooks, a man who prides himself on his anti-Hollywood stance, gleefully embracing his own popularity within the community. While on the surface, Brooks wants to bash everything evil and trivial about Hollywood, he's actually created a celebrity jerk-off of sorts. He trots out famous directors like Cameron, Scorsese and Rob Reiner for brief cameos, as if to say, "Look who I can get for my film!" Yet for years, in his films, in interviews and at conferences, Brooks has ridiculed the types of movies that guys like Reiner and Cameron make. Brooks surely believes he's made a wry and cynical picture about Hollywood's lack of creativity and inspiration. But The Muse reveals that this time the problem isn't with the studios, but with Brooks' own floundering. His once-cutting wit here feels dull. Get Zeus on the line--Brooks really does need a muse.


  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published August 25, 1999

Blue Plate: Cheap Eats Guide Portland%20Travel%20Specials! Full%20Sail%20Brewing
 

 

search site play dish screen visual arts music performance feature feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news