file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Advertiser

 


NEWS STORY

Tale of the Tape
Police explanations of their May 1 response don't match the video footage they have provided to the public.

BY PHILIP DAWDY
pdawdy@wweek.com


Photo by Basil Childers

 

 

Sidebar: More Letters From the Front Lines

For WW coverage, see "Panic in Portland," May 3, and "The New Portland Police Bureau," May 10, 2000.

The most prophetic line of the day came as police declared an emergency. Standing a half-block away from the action, one officer can be heard on a police videotape saying, "Uh-oh. Showtime."

After the fracas at Southwest 3rd and Salmon, marchers continued calmly on their way to the World Trade Center, where police called a street-level emergency at 4:06 pm.

"Anarchists did leave behind one territorial pissing: a spray-painted "A" inscribed in a circle on the Hilton's parking garage on Southwest Salmon Street.

Earlier claims of graffiti at City Hall turned out to be untrue. Reports now indicate that the worst thing there were chalk marks on the sidewalk.

Copies of the police videotapes are available at Multnomah County public libraries.


Mayor Vera Katz was hoping her May 9 forum would be a quasi-cuddly community event for people to "tell us what worked and what didn't" during the now-infamous May Day march. Instead, the 500-plus people gathered at the Maranatha Church of God last week greeted police chief Mark Kroeker with boos and hisses. While impolite, the conduct was somewhat understandable. Using a PowerPoint presentation interlaced with video clips, Assistant Chief Bruce Prunk ran through a May 1 time line, noting the places where police say marchers so crossed the line that the hammer had to come down. Most of what he said, however, bore little resemblance to what their videos show.

IRVINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

One of Prunk's most startling revelations was that that several black-masked marchers--a.k.a. "anarchists"--went onto the grounds of Irvington Elementary at lunch during the so-called "pirate" march that preceded the downtown demonstrations. They scared children and forced administrators to lock down the school at Northeast 13th Avenue and Brazee Street.

Irvington principal Carol Sanders, however, says it just didn't happen. Unclear about the march's purpose, she says she called children in from the playground to the school cafeteria. But she told WW that the school was never under lock-down conditions and, to her knowledge, no marcher set foot on school property and no children ever saw them, let alone were frightened by them.

NIKETOWN

Here, Prunk alleged, "rocks [were] thrown through [the] window" of the Nike store at Southwest 6th Avenue and Salmon Street.

Prunk later told WW that Josh Strausser was identified by store security guards and arrested in connection with the incident. He was charged with malicious mischief. None of the police videos, however, provide documentation of damage to windows, even though an officer with a hand-held camera walked right past the store. Nike spokesman Scott Reams told WW that no window was broken. He says that "a small nick on a window" was the only damage reported on May 1 and that the window wasn't replaced. He even downplayed the damage. "Windows get nicked up from all kinds of things," he says.

SOUTHWEST 5TH AVENUE AND MAIN STREET

This is the downtown corner where police horses threw marchers back into a bus shelter and riot squads squared off against radical cheerleaders and drummers. Prunk says that conflict was caused by dancers at the front of the 300-plus crowd who sat down in the street, an incident he says he witnessed from his 15th-floor Justice Center office. None of the police videos available to the public, however, contain footage from that corner.

Police did arrest Dawn Katona, a drummer at the front of the march, charging her with disorderly conduct. In his arrest report, a sergeant writes that his squad of riot cops was instructed to "take an individual out of the crowd." But the report does not mention people sitting in the street.

None of the 20-plus marchers contacted by WW say that they saw anyone sitting at the corner. "We were all in the street, in the lane
we were supposed to be in," says Gail Karuna, who was marching at the front.

Is it possible that the cheerleaders, who'd performed routines since the march began, had acted out another at this corner which involved stooping to the ground? "It would be either an amazing coincidence or precoordination," Prunk says.

SOUTHWEST 3RD AVENUE AND SALMON STREET

This is the one place where police have clear evidence of aggressive behavior by marchers. An unidentified person threw a plastic newspaper box, bruising the leg of a mounted officer. Videotape also shows that someone else lobbed a rock toward a mounted cop. Clearly, some of the protesters were way out of line.

What started the clash is more opaque. Videotape shows that for a minute and a half, marchers rounded the corner without incident. Then the five-person mounted patrol trotted into the crowd, apparently to arrest one young man. Momentum being what it is, the crowd continued forward up against the horses. The horses went wild. One woman was knocked to the pavement, leaving her bruised for several days.

This, too, is where Prunk advances the Black Mask Theory. He says a group of demonstrators in black masks--the "anarchists" whom police had been warned about--moved to the front of the crowd "with the express purpose of confronting the police personnel." Again, however, there is nothing on the video tapes that shows this. In one instance, two young men in black are seen standing in front of the horses, but they show no signs of aggression. Other video footage, provided by the police, shows a group of people in black in the center of the march, a position consistent with what the protesters recall. Contacted by WW, two Eugene "anarchists" said that police had been singling them out all day, especially the mounted patrol, and they decided to move into the middle of the crowd for protection.



MORE LETTERS From the Front Lines


Last week's cover story about the May Day protest ("The New Portland Police Bureau") included readers' observations about the clash between cops and demonstrators. Here are a few more that didn't fit in that issue, as well as a couple of new ones.

REWRITE THE BOOK
Our new police chief stated that the police aggression on May 1 all went "according to the book." If that is indeed the case, then "the book" needs to be changed. I am one Portlander who will not "get used to" seemingly militaristic shows of aggression by the police (as the police chief advised us to do in his interview with The Oregonian). The only violence I saw on Monday was both incited and exacerbated by the police. Their violence and aggression was unprovoked, unjust and completely unnecessary. The city must take whatever steps necessary to ensure that this type of assault to both the physical well-being and the constitutional freedoms of the people of Portland will not happen again.

Brenna Bell
Southeast Portland

JAILED FOR LIBERTY
I chose to be arrested on May Day. Our schools teach that free speech and assembly are necessary to protect against tyranny. Chief Kroeker and Mayor Katz need a remedial civics lesson. Only police states allow police to regulate speech. The police said, "Don't protest here. Don't protest there." Concerned I could not protest anywhere, I sat down on the curb. I ignored illegal, unconstitutional orders to move, then spent six hours in jail to make a point: Free speech is a vital, if sometimes messy, ingredient of a free society.

Andy Davis
Southeast Portland

WRONG WAY! DO NOT PROCEED
I work for a downtown law firm and currently live in the Irvington District in Northeast Portland. I was raised in Portland and have lived in Chicago, Nehalem, Cannon Beach and London, England. After living in old Portland, in small communities, and in a country with very few guns, I have a good idea of what works best in community policing. Portland is clearly headed in the wrong direction. As we all know, aggression escalates into more aggression. Then why are these archaic tactics that employ force and aggression being used in our city? How can Portland tolerate a police chief who, when confronted with this issue, tells us "this is how it is going to be" and "Portland will just have to get used to it"?

Kathleen Langtry
Northeast Portland

TIME FOR THE GUILLOTINE?
I'm not sure what point Sarah Griffith is trying to make when she says that
"Historically, when people protested (example: the French Revolution), they did not complain about getting pushed on the ground or arrested by local police" ("Letters from the Front Lines," WW, May 10, 2000). As a historian preparing a book on the riots of the early years of the French Revolution (before the fall of the Bastille), I can assure you that she is wrong. On Aug. 29, 1788, for example, Parisians were so enraged by a police riot of the previous day that they sacked and/or burned six police stations of the Paris Guard and disarmed, stripped and beat the guards they found there. Three weeks later the Parliament of Paris launched a criminal investigation into the conduct of the commander of the Paris Guard, Jean-Baptiste Dubois, and that of the lieutenant-general of police, Louis Thiroux de Crosne. The king quashed the investigation but persuaded Dubois to resign. Several years later, de Crosne was guillotined.

Come to think of it, maybe there is a point to Ms. Griffith's comparison. The experience of the French Revolution shows that police riots are not an effective way to prevent popular violence. In the short run they undermine the moral authority of the police, as we have seen here in Portland over the last two weeks. In the long run they desensitize crowds to violence and train them in paramilitary tactics. Believe me, Chief Kroeker, you don't want to go there.

Thomas Luckett
Southwest Portland

WAKEUP CALL FROM A BULLHORN
My wife and I were at the county courthouse paying a parking ticket when we saw the protest heading towards Salmon Street. When we were finished in the courthouse we saw that a large force of police had gathered just east of the protest which was now in front of the World Trade Center. Hoping to go there and observe, we were allowed to enter the protest, but the police formed a line just behind us, not allowing us to leave. We asked them if we could go to our car, and they said no. They didn't tell us to go the other way, just "no." Becoming angry at the situation, we decided to stay with the group and march the rest of the way to Powell's. That turned into a nightmare when the police were obviously trying to confuse us [by giving us] different directions. We heard south, west and east yelled to us on the bullhorns. We were luckily on the other side of the street when the police started shooting beanbags, but it made us very edgy nonetheless. After that we were almost run over by a cop on an ATV (he drove right at us!), and a cop on a horse backed right into us trying to break us off from the rest of the group. We were just trying to get back to our car!!

We ended up going to Powell's and taking part in the rally there, which we suddenly felt a part of. We would like to thank Mayor Vera Katz and the Portland Police for making us once again active in our political beliefs! We will not accept excessive force in Portland!

Bill Mitcheson and Kathy Loveday
Southeast Portland

NO HORSING AROUND
Two weeks ago I rushed to my fourth-floor office window at the unfamiliar sounds of the May Day crowd below. From my bird's-eye view, I saw three police officers on horseback, struggling to control their animals as they surrounded about 30 protesters marching towards the larger crowd on Southwest 5th Avenue. The horses were obviously terrified at the situation, and their nervous actions were scaring both police and protesters. The situation quickly turned ugly when the marchers attempted to run from the horses, further exciting the animals. One horse threw itself against an individual. These animals, while a quaint sight on our city streets, should not be used in potentially violent crowd-control situations. Gigantic, nervous beasts do little to calm a crowd or those charged with maintaining the peace.

Sonia A. Montalbano
Southeast Portland

EMERGENCY? WHAT EMERGENCY?
I was at the parade until it reached Waterfront Park, carrying the hand of a giant puppet, and I was very afraid of what the police were going to do. One cop grabbed my arm and pushed me out of the way along the parade route. When we got to the park, two friends and I decided we wanted to leave. We asked some of the riot-geared cops if we could cross the street and leave, and they said no. The only way they left open was south along the waterfront, and we were lucky enough to get by before they closed off that way, too. The police there said a state of emergency had been declared, but on the Channel 8 news the police chief said it was not declared.

Toby Wickwire
Northeast Portland

 


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Willamette Week | originally published May 10, 2000

file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Portland%20Travel%20Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news