file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Advertiser


NEWS STORY

BABY AND THE BATHWATER
An attempt to stop women from dumping unwanted newborns in trash cans could undermine Oregon's new adoption record law.

BY PATTY WENTZ
pwentz@wweek.com

illustration by Mark Kaufman @ Art O Mat

Baby Star's parents were found but were not prosecuted for child abandonment. The baby was adopted out.

In 1992, a baby girl was found dead at the bottom of a dumpster in Springfield.

The American Adoption Congress' analysis of safe-haven bills can
be found at www.american-adoption
congress.org/ abandoned_
baby.htm

For Bastard Nation's analysis, go to:
www.bastards.
org

 

 

The headlines are horrifying:

"Dead baby found in dumpster."

"Mother abandons child in public restroom."

Two years ago, for reasons Texas officials still don't understand, baby dumping became as trendy as capri pants in the Lone Star state; 13 newborns were left to die in 1998. Texas lawmakers responded with "Safe Haven" legislation, which designates hospitals, police stations and other public facilities as neutral zones where anyone can drop off a baby--no questions asked.

Across the country, at least 28 states followed suit, debating similar bills; more than a dozen have passed legislation.

In Oregon, state Sen. Peter Courtney read newspaper accounts of a rash of abandonments in Texas. The Salem Democrat thought that state's bill was a damn fine idea, and he wrote one himself for Oregon's 2001 Legislature. "I just took a notion, as they say, and thought about seeing if there was a way--if someone was in this desperate situation--to get them to do it in a safe way," he says.

On the surface, it would seem that lawmakers such as Courtney had found a simple solution to an appalling problem. A closer look shows that even such well-intentioned laws can have long-reaching, unintended consequences.

Like similar measures elsewhere, Courtney's current proposal would provide an affirmative defense against the criminal penalty for child abandonment as long as the infant was left in a designated safe-haven spot. The mother wouldn't be required to reveal her name, the name of the father, or any information about herself or the child. She could leave it for adoption and walk away.

The thinking behind this idea is that if a woman knows she won't be penalized or questioned, she is more likely to leave her baby in a safe place, rather than dump it in a dangerous one.

Courtney says in drafting his bill, he talked to experts from the state Adult and Family Services agency, police officers and district attorneys, and he encountered no opposition.

But Courtney overlooked one constituency: adoptees.

Dolores Teller, a birth mother, is the president of the Oregon Adoptee Rights Association. She is against the legislation, as are the American Adoption Congress, Bastard Nation and other adoption-reform groups. Teller, who is also the Oregon rep for the AAC, says she sent Courtney a letter voicing her opposition to his bill, but he did not respond.

"On the surface it sounds like the best thing to do," she says. "When we hear about the babies in the dumpsters, certainly, we'd rather have them at the hospital door. But you have to think a little deeper."

According to Teller and other critics, there are several problems with safe-haven legislation. The first is that the anonymity allowed under the law creates a loophole in Ballot Measure 58, which made original birth certificates available to adult adoptees. By passing M58, voters decided that every person born in Oregon (except those conceived via anonymous sperm or egg donorship) is entitled under law to know the name of his or her original parents. Abandoned babies, however, would have no original birth certificate, no medical history and no means to track their biological roots.

Adam Pertman, author of Adoption Nation, says the safe-haven laws legitimize child abandonment. "Think about the 17-year-old woman who doesn't want to face this pregnancy. Her boyfriend, maybe, will whisper in her ear, 'Just drop it off at Mercy General, they won't ask questions.' She'll think, 'Great, I have another option.'"

It's an option, he says, that could set her and the baby up for future pain.

"Unfortunately," he says, "no one ever asks the birth mothers. Have they interviewed women who gave their children away to find out if there is a way to help them?"

In reality, he points out, baby abandonment is a rare occurrence. Most women who leave their children have drug and alcohol problems and do so in the hospital shortly after giving birth. Those children are not officially deemed "abandoned" because they are left in the care of medical staff.

Research on baby abandonments is nearly nonexistent. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services used national newspaper accounts to come up with 105 incidents nationwide in 1998. In Oregon, there has been only one case in the past two years: the highly publicized "Baby Star," a newborn infant found next to the Starbucks cart at Legacy Emanuel hospital.

In fact, no one knows if the laws are effective. If Texas is any example, they aren't. Since that state's law passed in 1999, 13 babies have been abandoned--none at safe-haven spots.

Courtney maintains that an anonymous baby is better than a dead one. Still, he says he has no intention of undermining Measure 58 or doing more harm than good. Once the legislative session is under way, he will hold hearings and consider removing the anonymity portion of the bill.

 

file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Portland%20Travel%20Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news