file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Advertiser

 


HINDSIGHT

1,000 PINTS OF BUSH LITE
How the media let George W. off the hook during the 2000 campaign.

BY JEFF ELLIOT
editor@monitor.net

 

 

A longer version of this article first appeared in the Albion Monitor,
an online news-paper based in Sebastopol, Calif.: www.monitor.
net/monitor/.



The Committee
of Concerned Journalists found that during key weeks before the election, 13 percent of the stories about Gore were positive, compared with 24 percent of those about Bush: www.journalism.
org/ccj/index.html





Excerpts from the CNN interview with Larry Flynt, including the section about the alleged abortion, can be found at www.bushwatch.
com/flynt.html

 

 

Pity future historians puzzling the cause of what seems to be the inevitable release of Bush Presidency II. Was it the "Nader Factor"? That voters trusted George W.'s leadership abilities? Scholars hoping to glean answers by studying the media coverage will be frustrated. After all, one of the vital topics discussed in the weeks before the election was whether Rolling Stone magazine had airbrushed Al Gore's crotch.

It's not been a proud year for the American media--and we're talking about events before election night. Reporting was superficial; candidates completely defined the agenda. Nader and his questions about corporate influence were shut out of the debates. Where do Bush or Gore stand on the $1.3 billion aid package given to Colombia to fight the Drug War? We don't know--it's one of many issues the press never raised.

With the election so close, any question of media bias is magnified. Two studies, the most recent one released two weeks ago by the Committee of Concerned Journalists, found that stories about Gore were far more likely to be negative as those about Bush--and that's before giggling about the sexy Rolling Stone cover and Gore's "national endowment."

Besides continuing a yearlong trend critical of Gore, the studies show the press avoided the issue key to the Bush candidacy--his character. Here are three examples:

1. Where's W?

There are several odd gaps in Dubya's past, but there is no more fuzzy period than the year from May 1972 to May 1973. In April of '72 he began drifting away from military service, although there were still two years remaining in his National Guard hitch. Bush apparently didn't report once for duty for over seven months, even skipping his mandatory annual physical. Supposedly, he transferred to the Alabama National Guard in mid-1972 after Jimmy Allison, a drinking buddy, recruited him to help in a political campaign in that state. Bush worked on the campaign, but there's no evidence of him at the Alabama air base. A group of veterans is currently offering a $3,500 reward for anyone who can verify his presence there.

He apparently returned to the Texas National Guard in early 1973, but his immediate superiors filed a report in late April stating that they thought he was still in Alabama.

Although these charges are far more serious than Clinton's "draft dodging," the press showed only tepid interest. The Boston Globe first raised questions five months before the election, but no one else seemed inclined to follow. Then, just before election day, The Chicago Tribune picked up the story, and new articles questioning his service record appeared in both The New York Times and Washington Post. But then the DUI story hit the press.

2. 1,000 Pints of Lite

The way that now-famous drunken-driving story was uncovered should dispel any doubts about the media's kid-glove handling of Dubya. Here was a 24-year-old story that any cub reporter could have uncovered by walking into the courthouse at Kennebunkport, home to the famous Bush family compound--but not one member of the press had bothered to ask a clerk.

The DUI story invited the press to raise a very significant issue: Is George W. Bush an alcoholic? Bush had always excused his drinking with the now famous "young and irresponsible" shrug and wink. The 1976 DUI didn't change his behavior. He continued drinking heavily for another decade, including a two-month binge after his failed congressional bid in 1978.

Press reaction to the DUI story was mixed. According to a Poynter Institute analysis that week, newspapers downplayed it on the first day. Many, such as The Oregonian, buried smallish items inside the paper with other campaign news. Others, such as The Washington Post and San Francisco Chronicle, placed it on the front page, but not as a lead story.

Well-trained to stay on-message, Bush held a brief press conference that night. No fewer than five times in the quick Q&A he noted that it was "interesting" that his arrest was being exposed less than a week before the vote. By the end of the day, two soundbites dominated the news: Bush admitting again that he had made "some mistakes" and Gore denying that his campaign had anything to do with the story. By the next day, both print and broadcast pundits were suggesting that the story would "backfire" on the Democrats.

Not only had Bush managed to hide his boozy past, but he also effectively killed interest in the holes in his military record.

3. Our Man Flynt

Someday there will be a dictionary with an entry for "loose cannon" that contains a grinning picture of Larry Flynt.

It's easy to see why the producers of CNN's Crossfire invited Hustler magazine publisher Flynt to the Oct. 20 show: The topic that night was Internet pornography. But at the end of the live TV show, Flynt said he wanted to talk about the election. He then declared that anti-abortion Bush played a part in a girlfriend's abortion back in the '70s. Or did he? By Oct. 25, his accusations had disappeared from the transcript of the show posted on CNN's website and have been edited out of rebroadcasts and videotapes of the show.

Flynt claims to have four affidavits from girlfriends of the woman and says he knows the name of the doctor who performed the procedure--but won't publish them unless the woman herself is willing to go public. It sounds like a dodge, but remember that last year Flynt also exposed sexual peccadilloes of House impeachment manager Bob Barr and Almost-Speaker Bob Livingston. Give this to Larry Flynt: Once the man starts waving his affidavits, he ain't been wrong yet.

The merits of Flynt's claim aside, it was an extraordinary act of censorship by CNN. After San Francisco talk-radio host Bernie Ward picked up the story, columnists for both The San Francisco Examiner and Chronicle ran items. The Chronicle quoted a CNN rep saying the program disappeared because Flynt's allegations were "unsubstantiated and harmful."

What a difference eight years makes. In the final three-week stretch of the 1992 campaign, hundreds of newspaper, magazine and wire service stories routinely dropped the name of Gennifer Flowers, the supposed ex-mistress of candidate Bill Clinton.

file:///Sangfroid/#Web%20Pages/pages-archive/Portland%20Travel%20Specials!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

search site rogue of the week scoreboard news buzz 500 words News Stories Lead Story feedback site map search site personals classified webxtra culture news