|
"We will flood the streets with justice" |

POLITICS
Red Squad Redux
Portland
activists aren't the only ones complaining about police tactics.
by
ABBY SCHER
243-2122
It will come
as no surprise to Portland activists that over the past year the
U.S. government has intensified its crackdown on political dissidents.
Activists in
Washington, D.C., along with others in Philadelphia, Los Angeles,
Detroit and Seattle, have filed lawsuits over recent police tactics,
exposing a level of surveillance and disruption of political activities
not seen since the FBI deployed its dirty tricks against the Central
American solidarity movement in the '80s.
Among police
agencies themselves, this is something of an open secret. Last spring,
the U.S. Attorney's office bestowed an award on members of the D.C.
police department for their "unparalleled" coordination with other
police agencies during the IMF protests. "The FBI provided valuable
background on the individuals who were intent on committing criminal
acts and were able to impart the valuable lessons learned from Seattle,"
the U.S. Attorney declared.
Civil-liberties
lawyers say criminalizing peaceful demonstrators violates their
rights of free speech and association. "It's political profiling,"
said Jim Lafferty, director of the National Lawyers Guild's Los
Angeles office, which is backing lawsuits stemming from the Democratic
Convention. "They target organizers. It's a new level of crackdown
on dissent."
A major question
posed by the lawsuits is whether the federal government trained
local police to violate the rights of protesters. The FBI held seminars
for local police in the protest cities on the lessons of the 1999
Seattle disorders to help them prepare for the demonstrations. It
has also formed 27 "joint terrorism task forces" composed of federal,
state and local law-enforcement officers, including those in Portland,
aimed at suppressing what it sees as domestic terrorism on the left
and on the right.
Among the police
actions that worry civil libertarians:
* Police
raids. In D.C., saying there was a fire threat, the police,
fire department and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms kicked
everyone out of the convergence space, arrested the "leaders" and
seized puppets and political materials.
* False stories.
In D.C., police announced they had found a Molotov cocktail
but later admitted it was a plastic soda bottle stuffed with rags.
Similarly, the makings of "pepper spray," police admitted later,
were actually peppers found in the kitchen area.
* Trumped-up
charges. In Philadelphia, police arrested 70 activists on conspiracy
and obstruction-of-traffic charges, prior to a demonstration, using
a warrant that drew on an obscure far-right newsletter claiming
that the young people were funded by communist groups and therefore
dangerous. On April 15, Washington police rounded up 600 demonstrators
marching against the prison-industrial complex, picking up tourists
in the process, and held them on buses for 16 hours.
* List-making.
The BBC reported that the FBI gave the Czech government a list
of activists that it used in stopping Americans from entering for
anti-IMF demonstrations in Prague in September. A journalist interviewed
two such Americans, who said they had no criminal record but had
been briefly held and released in Seattle during the anti-WTO protests.
The collaboration
of federal and local police harks back to the height of the municipal
Red Squads, renamed "intelligence units" in the postwar period.
During the heyday of J. Edgar Hoover and his illegal Counterintelligence
Program, or COINTELPRO, the FBI relied on these local police units
for information about antiwar and other activists.
These days,
the local police may not need encouragement from the feds to rein
in nonviolent demonstrators. "There's a militaristic pattern to
policing these days, the increasing us-vs.-them attitude," says
Lafferty.
Recent legislation
has all but encouraged repressive police tactics. A 1998 federal
law, for example, gave federal intelligence agencies vast new powers
to track suspected terrorists with "roving wiretaps" and secret
court orders that allow covert tracing of phone calls and obtaining
of documents.
The Antiterrorism
and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, meanwhile, increased the
authority of the FBI to investigate donations to nonviolent political
organizations deemed "terrorist" by the government. And Clinton
in his last days created the post of counterintelligence czar, whose
mission, The Wall Street Journal reports, includes working
with corporations to maintain "economic security."
More than 50
years ago, President Truman unleashed a crackdown on the left that
was carried on by his Republican successor. We may face a similar
crisis today. "There's been a massive violation of civil rights
and constitutional rights," says Bill Goodman, legal director of
the Center for Constitutional Rights. "This decision to suspend
the Constitution is one that has been made now at one event after
another. The purpose is to prevent the public from hearing the message
of the protesters."
|