|

Q&A
Craig Rosebraugh:Radical Mouthpiece
BY
PHILIP DAWDY
pdawdy@wweek.com
Three years
ago, even as the most visible protestor in Portland, Craig Rosebraugh
had trouble getting much attention for his anti-capitalist and animal-rights
causes (see "Saving the World One Cat at a Time," WW, Dec. 3, 1997).
Even people sympathetic to his impulses found this noisome punk
too abrasive to deal with and too much an individualist in a movement
of group cohesion.
Soon after,
though, he emerged as the spokesman for the Earth Liberation Front,
an anonymous alliance of burn-by-night saboteurs (or, depending
on your socio-political lens, righteous monkey-wrenchers).
Rosebraugh's
affiliation with the radical environmental group has brought unprecedented
attention. Between 1996 and 1999, his name popped up in only four
Oregonian articles. In the past 12 months, though, he's been mentioned
in a dozen of the daily paper's stories, including its series on
"eco-terrorists." And as a result of at least 10 recent ELF actions
on Long Island, N.Y., the national press has discovered the shaved-headed
spokesman. In the past three weeks, everyone from National Public
Radio and the New York Times to 60 Minutes (with 20/20 in the near
future) has featured Rosebraugh as the face of new-jack discontent
in America.
It's not just
the press that's noticed. Rosebraugh has been a consistent target
of federal law-enforcement agencies. His every move and communication
has been monitored. The U.S. Attorney's Office has repeatedly hauled
him before grand juries investigating ELF-claimed actions in the
western states, which have been directed principally at timber companies
and, most prominently, at a lodge at the Vail, Colo., ski area in
October 1998. Despite an FBI raid on his apartment last February
seeking ELF-related evidence, no indictment has been returned against
Rosebraugh.
Fame, however,
has not brought fortune. Rosebraugh makes a living running his own
vegan baking company, Calendula, and making sandwiches and muffins
sold at Nature's Northwest and People's Food Co-op, among other
stores.
In the wake
of the East Coast actions, WW staff writer Philip Dawdy recently
sat down with Rosebraugh.
WW: You
said things are busy. What are you busy with right now?
Craig Rosebraugh:
Mainly doing the media work for Earth Liberation Front actions that
have gone on in the last few months in Long Island, here in Oregon
and in Colorado. We've probably been in 75 colleges and media outlets
around the world in the past week.
Colorado?
What was going on in Colorado?
In mid to late
November, a luxury home being built was burned to the ground in
a suburb of Boulder, and [credit] was claimed by the ELF.
What's wrong
with luxury homes?
What's wrong
with luxury homes!?
Yeah. What's
wrong with luxury homes? Why burn them down?
There are many
answers to that question, many of which I've been speaking to for
the last week. I may sound like a tape recorder.
Then give
me your pat, standard answer.
Well, number
1, there is no reason in my mind that it is all right for someone
to have a few-hundred-thousand-dollar up until a multimillion-dollar
home when there are people living in their same city who can't afford
proper shelter, who can't afford proper nourishment or proper health
care. I think that is a major screw-up in society.
Number 2, all
of these new homes that have been targeted by the ELF have been
threatening some natural or threatened land in those areas. The
Colorado home was being built on very fragile natural environment
that was previously undeveloped. In Long Island, they have had an
overdevelopment problem for a long time.
What specific
environmental degradation is going on in Long Island?
The last wild
areas of the whole island are being destroyed. They are talking
about putting in over 150 to 200 new luxury homes. Critics, both
from the conservative environmental community and in the radical
environmental community, feel that if that goes through, the last
natural species, plant or animal, on Long Island are going to be
completely gone.
Your frustration
with this construction creates a simmering sense of outrage over
how social orders should be: In essence, it's wrong that rich people
build such goddamn big houses. Who makes you guys the agent of judgment?
Who makes...?
Who makes
the ELF the agents of judgment on that? What gives them the right?
My own personal
belief is that the right is given by natural law. To me, natural
laws are the different qualities that exist and allow life to exist
on the planet, be it human, animal and/or plant.
Such as?
Clean air,
clean water, clean soil. If those in any way are being threatened,
then [it affects] everyone on the planet. Not just white people,
not just black people, not just animals, not just plants, but the
entire ecosystem and all of life as a whole.
This sounds
like a leftist interpretation of Christian thought.
I don't consider
it leftist at all.
What do
you consider it?
I consider
it a proper belief.
Fair enough.
But you haven't answered the question: Why burn it down? Why not
just stage gigantic protests that will shame people into taking
a hike?
People are
becoming more and more outraged at watching the same old tired,
exhausted, unsuccessful state-sanctioned means of protest that gets
nowhere, not only with the environmental movement but the animal-rights
movement and any other social-justice movement occurring in modern-day
times.
What people?
Who are they?
The Earth Liberation
Front number one, the Animal Liberation Front number two. People
engaged in property destruction and different sorts of direct action
at protests like WTO and IMF. Take a clear evaluation of the popular
environmental movement-the modern one has been going on for say
30 years in this country. What has it really accomplished? Are we
better off now than we were then? Where are we as far as our clean
air, our clean water, our clean soil? From my own personal beliefs,
we are not winning the battle. We are losing.
Why is that?
I think it
is because we have given in and coerced ourselves to believe in
left-wing politics that say there are certain things you must do
in order to have proper social change, you must follow certain guidelines
with a right and a wrong...
Give me
an example.
Following state-sanctioned
means of protest...
Stay on
the sidewalk?
Stay on the
sidewalk. When you have a march, get a parade permit.
It almost
sounds like from your language that the environment is almost becoming
like the Vietnam War for the generation of the late-'60s and '70s.
In what way?
You are
seeing radicals in opposition to the mainstream beliefs attached
to that issue. There are those who would compare the actions of
the ELF to the Weathermen, the SLA. Do you see any connection?
Indeed I do.
As I stated before, the ELF is not absolutely an environmental organization.
The main idea is not just environmentalism, but looking at what
is causing environmental destruction on this planet and what is
also causing exploitation and murder on what would have to be a
natural sort of chain.
I have noticed
over the years an increased emphasis in the ELF press releases on
the dollar value of the economic damage. Why is that?
The whole reason
these actions are going on is because people realize that certain
entities are profiting off their greed. They are not going to listen
to morals or ethics. If they did, they wouldn't be in that business
anyway. They would realize, as I do, that we need certain qualities
on this planet to survive, and you wouldn't do anything to threaten
them. So if they aren't going to listen to morals and ethics, they
will listen to the possibility of losing money, because they value
wealth. It's pure economic ideology.
I want to
come back to the point of the new generation of radicals. Can you
point to any particular, single event that pushed people over the
edge?
I don't think
it's that simple. In just the last few years, you had a very large
action against the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. A
few years later, you had WTO and then the IMF, and then the protest
over Prague.
Are you
trying to save the Earth or human beings?
Both. We are
trying to save all life and the planet, which provides all life.
What evidence
do you have that this is working, that anybody gives a rat's ass?
There are what
I consider three major goals of an ELF action. The first is to cause
immediate economic damage to the entity at hand. Second is to reveal
and educate the public as much as possible about the atrocities
committed against the environment. The third is to take all necessary
precautions against harming any human or animal.
Let me stop
at that one. My understanding is some firefighters suffered smoke
damage....
That is the
claim by mainstream media. I have yet to hear an independent confirmation
of that.
Let's assume
for a minute that someone did actually get hurt and suffer smoke
inhalation; is that an acceptable action?
Well, I personally
don't like to see anyone get hurt for any reason. But I think the
idea here is to keep in mind the murder, the destruction, the exploitation
that goes on on a daily basis, committed by people who are out percolating
greed and pure lust as far as wealth goes....
But the
firefighter wasn't out for greed lust, or anything like that-let's
face it, he was just doing his job. He is a cog in the wheel.
That is correct.
But it depends on what you are doing with your work. I definitely
have respect for firefighters, and I don't want to see people get
injured. But I believe that a lot of times when buildings are empty,
firefighters are told not to save the building if it is going to
risk their life.
Does the
ELF or anybody pay you for the work you do?
I have never
been paid for the work I have done; it's subjective justice issues,
so to speak.
What?
Subjective
justice issues.
What does
that mean?
I consider
it the work of promoting justice on a planetary basis.
The New
York Times called you a publicist.
I am that too.
What do
you think of the reporting of the Long Island fire? Did the media
get the message out on what the ELF is all about?
It did. And
there is the second guideline of the ELF: to try and reveal and
educate the atrocities committed against the environment.
So, even
though the media equated the ELF with terrorists, it was a success?
The majority
of the news stories, if not all the news stories, are going to be
somewhat negative against the ELF. I know that. I don't think the
mainstream media can represent them in a non-biased fashion. They
have to use that term "terrorism" because there are different societal
enforcements in place. But if there is any sort of information that
comes out about the incident or the issue that the ELF was targeting,
I consider that a success.
Are you
a member of the ELF?
No.
But how
can you speak for the ELF and not be a member, when you are clearly
a fellow traveler?
The ELF is
again anonymous, not only to me, but also to themselves and different
selves. I am not anonymous; I am a spokesperson who has been chosen
by whoever these anonymous people are, claiming responsibility for
actions that have already occurred. I release that information to
the public and then I go on to talk about the ideology of the organization
as I have interpreted it from communications that have come down
for the last three to four years.
Why should
anybody believe that you don't have connection with these people?
How is that provably true?
Prove that
it is not true. I am supposed to be presumed innocent until proven
guilty, am I not?
But the
presumption is that because you have been the subject of FBI, ATF
and Forest Service investigations, there is something up with Craig
Rosebraugh.
The only thing
up is that different law-enforcement agencies have no other suspects,
no other leads to go on as far as catching those individuals involved
in ELF activity. So they go after the only public face or faces
they can identify.
How did
you receive your most recent communication? Email? Fax?
I never disclose
the type of communications or how I receive them. And I don't plan
to.
Do you have
a new fax machine since the feds took your stuff?
I had some
really old equipment donated to me from an anonymous source on the
East Coast.
Do you even
use the Internet anymore?
I have personal
email; I do research on it.
You know
you are being watched.
Indeed I do.
Do you enjoy
your celebrity at all?
I don't hate
it. If it really bothered me and if it came to a point that it was
destroying me, then I might choose to step back and help find other
folks to help with the media work. But I wouldn't say I enjoy it.
It is the hardest thing I have ever done in my life. I can't imagine
doing something that would be more difficult.
What is so
hard about it? You get information from the ether and you do press
releases. Reporters call you and you say, 'Here is the ideology,
here is the action, here is the dollar damage. Thank you. Good bye.'
There is a
lot behind the scenes on a psychological basis that is very difficult.
You are talking about years of FBI, ATF, government harassment that
has been growing to the point that I wake up early in the morning
thinking the door of my home has been broken down. So I put on my
clothes early in the morning so I will be ready when the door gets
broken down. The psychological games they play put that extra pressure
on you. I have been repeatedly targeted recently by the FBI and...
How so?
Well, after
a week of trying to find me through different means, they gave me
a subpeona to testify against another individual in a criminal contempt
trial. For a week straight, they were outside my house knocking
on the door, at all hours of the day, sitting in my driveway for
hours at a time. I would leave my house and be followed in my vehicle.
And beyond that, I get threatened all the time from people all over
the country, via email and the telephone.
Have you
turned these threats over to the authorities?
Who would I
turn it over to? I don't trust the police, why would I trust the
FBI?
Why do I
see you at so few protests? You are only at the animal ones now,
and rarely even at those.
For a variety
of reasons. My health is not what it should be due to stress and
anxiety. That is part of it. Another is that I'm becoming more and
more of a disbeliever in the same state-sanctioned means of protest
that I talked about earlier and trying to prioritize my time in
a way that I feel is most effective. The work I have been doing
revolves around the press office and publicizing the work of underground
groups who do direct action.
There are
people in the radical community who don't like you.
A lot of people
don't like me.
What do
you make of that?
I think they
should evaluate why they don't like me. If it is for a personal
reason, that's fine. I have no problem with that. If it is for an
ideological reason or strategic reason or they don't like the tactics
I advocate, then I think perhaps they should rethink why they don't
like it and do some more self-education on past historical social
movements and the role that direct action played in those.
Are you
an anarchist?
I don't label
myself in any way. Usually that is left up to the mainstream media
to do.
OK. Here's
your chance. What are you?
I am Craig.
|