Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Ask the Editor · What Were We Thinking?
April 22nd, 2009 MARK ZUSMAN | Ask the Editor
 

What Were We Thinking?

WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.

3 Comments
     
Tags:

Got a question about the future of journalism or how Willamette Week covered something, or didn’t cover it? Ask away. WW Editor Mark Zusman—that's his friendly mug in the picture—will respond to as many reader questions as he can, right here!

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
04.23.2009 at 07:07 Reply
Dear Editor,

I read your paper's recent article about former OHSU Research Assistant Tony Carr with incredulity. It was just bad reporting, which means bad editing since it got printed.

The article reported Carr's side and OHSU's side of the discussion. But when the article name-dropped some other people who oppose animal research, it failed to balance the article by listing any of the other people--beside OHSU--who support this kind of research.

Also, if Carr's salary at OHSU is pertinent to the article, then certainly his consultant fees for In Defense are relevant as well.

Sincerely,

Ethan Beckley

 

04.24.2009 at 02:50 Reply
PLEASE DON'T PRINT:

For a while, it seemed there was a system in place for monitoring anyone posting under a name already used. We lost Julia Gomez, when someone used her name to post comments opposite to her opinion. Same began to happen with a poster using my name with a cap. A, and posting opposite. Effort was made to stop that, but I'm seeing it happening again.

Kelly's Live Review of OBT, 4/20, "Annie" posting at #1, is not me.

Beth's article 4/22, "annie" (interestingly a small a, same as I post), replied to the "gayle harris #17 comment, on Beth's article concerning "Swing Vote Saltzman Wavering on Soccer..."

I did respond to the gaye harris comment #19, 4/23, on the Adams to Wheeler, Sellwood Bridge piece, however.

I know I'm not the only person in town going by annie, but it seems on a blog site, as posters and their opinions are identified by name, that it could be used as a tool for the opposing party, or "Trolls" or "Haters", to get one over on the argument at hand, as a method to confuse and throw the readers off target a bit, and disarm. It's a subtle and not so subtle way to diffuse and disarm.

I also feel it a form of harassement.

Anyway, aren't there methods in place for monitoring attempts to reuse a Poster name already used? It seemed awhile back when I brought it to your attention WWeek was able to get a handle on it. I believe we will see more of it as the Recall date approaches and the arguments get more heated. I think it's important to not give them an inch, they will use whatever means possible to gain ground and keep control.

I believe I've seen other names used as well. You get use to a certain opinion from a name, then out of the blue will come a complete about face, under the same name.

 

04.28.2009 at 07:46 Reply
GKW
WW's homepage does not seem to be compatible with the new Internet Explorer 8, it continually flashes, every couple of seconds making it impossible to read.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close