A Lovers' Guide to Tonight's Blazers/Wizards Game: An Almost Live Special Report
News I will not be live-blogging tonight's Blazers/Wizards Valentine's Day matchup (too busy being romant... More
Feb 14, 2012 05:05 pm by CASEY JARMAN | Comments 0
Valentine's Day in the Naked City: Couple Arrested After Sex Role-Playing in Grocery Parking Lot
News A Northeast Portland couple took sex-in-a-car to new places in celebration of Valentine’s Day, muc... More
Feb 14, 2012 03:55 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN | Comments 0
Washington State Senate Approves CRC Tolls
News A big step to raising money for the $3.5 billion Columbia River Crossing cleared its first vote Tues... More
Feb 14, 2012 01:03 pm by WW Staff | Comments 0
Sam Adams is on Yelp
News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More
Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN | Comments 4


If you accept the observations of the Western Institute for the Study of the Environment, in a big fire year, Oregon will produce more green house gases from wildland fire than from all other human inputs, including Boardman, autos, cows, etc.
So the party that runs our country, that has control of the administrative branch, and both branches of Congress, and has the same political control in Oregon, encourages wildland fires to burn, but wants to eliminate beneficial fire as a management tool for farmers.
I read FreeP (Detroit Free Press) on the net. The defunct Packard plant of millions of square feet of building and tunnels and roads, is filled with "stuff." Recyclables, garbage, whatever, and is constantly on fire, and the Detroit fire dept. is forbidden from entering it at night to fight fire. Mostly they just let them burn out. Can you imagine the air contributions from that deal?
Huge hypocrisy in liberal, Democrat treatment of who burns what and when. Not equality of treatment. And no equal treatment under the law. Oregon is 65% public lands. All are considered available for "beneficial fire" through them, not unlike the almost annual WFU (wildland fire use) fires from the Three Sisters and Mt. Washington and Mr. Jefferson Wilderness areas that have a propensity to end up on private land, and land put aside for heritage forests. Meanwhile, field burning is painted as a scourge on the countryside.
So which is it? Private burn bad and public burn good? We must expect to drive a Smart car to allow for WFU burning on public lands? We should destroy our economy by not fighting or suppressing wildland fire and punish private greenhouse gas emissions? It is a HUGE deal HUGE.
If you want to see the scope of ongoing fires, follow Inciweb (Google it) the national fire reporting site. They have narrations of public speak for ongoing fires, and the management of them. It would appear that air quality is NOT a national concern when managing public lands.
The official office hours begin at 5:30am, yet if you arrive any later than 5am you can count on 15-20 other individuals being there to take the 5-15 new jobs available.
10 years ago Labor Ready was one of the few ways someone without an address could make a days (minimum) wage. Today there are half of the offices, half of the jobs, and 210% of the competition as former construction workers and other laid off individuals stoop to manual labor to survive. Please write about this. I'll email this to another WW email address as well to be sure it gets through.
-A worker