Monday, February 13

Shit Portlanders Say

"Has anyone seen my growler?"

Arts & Books OK, this is a little hit and miss, but we'll admit it: we lold. Stick with it—it gets better as it... More

Feb 9, 2012 03:23 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 4
 

One More Round of Fertile Ground Reviews

Arts & Books Groovin’ Greenhouse 1Fertile Ground is best known for its showcases of new theater works, but the ... More

Jan 31, 2012 11:17 pm by BRETT CAMPBELL  | Comments 0
 

Live Review: 4x4=8 Musicals at the CoHo Theatre

Arts & Books 4x4=8. Yes, they know the math is wrong, but the title is still apt. Live on Stage Productions’ co... More

Jan 27, 2012 11:46 am by MARIANNA HANE WILES  | Comments 1
 

Live Review: The Tripping Point at Shaking the Tree

Arts & Books There's a reason fairy tales have been plumbed for art's sake so deeply: they're bottomless. Murky w... More

Jan 27, 2012 11:06 am by JONATHAN FROCHTZWAJG  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · Arts & Books · Visual Arts · The Century Project At Bamboo Grove
October 7th, 2009 RICHARD SPEER | Visual Arts
 

The Century Project At Bamboo Grove

Photographer Frank Cordelle wrestles with body acceptance.

97 Comments
     
Tags:
ADELE, 85, BY FRANK CORDELLE

It’s hard to believe that in 2009, the sight of a naked body can still provoke such a spectacular gamut of feelings, from arousal to repulsion. But it can, especially when the bodies in question aren’t the toned and airbrushed ideals we see in Elle, Playboy and Lara Croft movies. The swellings, sproutings, striations, deflations, varicosities, and surgical additions and subtractions that grace and afflict our bodies are a source of fascination for Wyoming-based photographer Frank Cordelle.

He homes in on the relationship women have with their bodies in his traveling photography exhibition, currently installed at the increasingly fearless and radar-worthy Bamboo Grove Gallery. The show is titled The Century Project because Cordelle has assembled 100 photographs of women ranging in age from newborn to within spitting distance of the century mark.

The models are nothing if not diverse: racially, socioeconomically and, above all, physically. Many of them tell harrowing anecdotes about their bodies in their own words, reproduced in text that accompanies each photo. There is 15-year-old Kelsi, mortifyingly self-conscious about her big boobs, and 18-year-old Amanda, a self-identifying anorexic who clutches a stick that’s only slightly more brittle-looking than she is.

There is Linda in her wheelchair, Kerry with her prosthetic legs, Meryl the transgender stripper from Portland, and Reema the Pakistani Muslim who defied her religion to pose nude. There are cutters, women who are morbidly obese, women who’ve had mastectomies and double mastectomies, and women who allow the camera to see them crying, menstruating and revealing the physical and psychic scars of sexual abuse. Perhaps most discomfiting of all, there are naked little old ladies who look just like our mothers, grandmothers and great-grandmothers. As a rule, the older the women, the bigger their smiles and the greater comfort they exude in the buff.

The show’s greatest strength and weakness is the way it attunes us to our own biases. As much as we would like to believe that the body-acceptance movement has inured us to the glorious distortions of the flesh, even the more enlightened among us become uncomfortably aware of our internal gasps, guffaws and gross-outs in the face of such humbling carnal diversity. Cordelle implicitly chastises us for our persistent phobias, tries to help us get past them, then pats us on the back at exhibition’s end, sending us out the door self-satisfied at our broadened acceptance, whistling “It’s a Small World” and feeling very much like we’ve just watched an NC-17-rated after-school special.

If we could, most of us would change at least a few things about our bodies. As we age and change in the midst of this sex-saturated, Botox-and-breast-lift culture, we have a choice to either rebel against or learn to love ourselves. It sounds so simple, yet for many it’s a tragically difficult battle. Maybe The Century Project, despite its preachy aftertaste, can make that battle a notch or two easier to win.


GO: The Century Project at Bamboo Grove, 134 SE Taylor St., 971-207-8476. Closes Oct. 29.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
10.07.2009 at 05:54 Reply
You mention a 15 year old in this article. How is this appropriate? This collection also includes naked 7, 10, and 12 year old naked girls. Why would the Bamboo Grove exploit children in this way? Why is your publication glamorizing an exhibit that includes the naked bodies of children? Can we really expect that these kids know what they "consent" to when they have their naked pictures taken at these ages? What is the REAL motive here?

 

10.07.2009 at 09:30 Reply
You say "women" yet a fifteen-year-old GIRL is not a woman and should not be plastered for all to see. You also fail to mention that this "artist" would like to photograph females in the nude starting when they are born including toddlers and young girls. This is not winning a fight for body acceptance...it's blatant pornography cloaked as women's liberation. The fact you mention the word "carnal" in your article reveals the truth...NC-17 also is a bid towards the dark side of this so-called lesson. We read between the lines and see this for what it is: exploitation.

 

10.08.2009 at 05:10 Reply
A very few people have repeatedly launched the same tirade of ignominious ignorance at The Century Project. It wore thin long ago. Their intolerant rant about the Project, fueled by fantastic and fanatic misrepresentations of it and much else, suggests a dangerous obsession.

The Century Project raises questions, like much good art. The answers should be based in careful thought and some reality.

Some of the reality is found in the very many comments over the past 27 years from a huge variety of people --- medical and counseling professionals, religious persons, writers, academics, individuals of every imaginable sort --- who have praised the Project and stated why.

The triumphs of this work will continue with or without wrongful comments by people whose agendas and issues don't really get in the way.

Lucky Portland to have this work for nearly a month.

 

10.08.2009 at 10:16 Reply
Dr. Rapaport,

You are the publisher of the book in which these naked pictures appear. Thus, you make money off of the naked pictures of children. That is an important context for the discussion here. There are many of us in this world who believe that taking pictures of naked girls, publishing them in books, and putting them on display is at best inappropriate. Many of us believe it should be illegal. The real question is why are you so obsessed with publishing this book and showing pictures of naked little girls to so many people?

As one of the nation's leading researchers on sexual assault prevention and having done research on the effects of such pictures and pornography on our society, I can say with a high degree of confidence that seeing pictures of the variety found in The Century Project has been shown by research to lead to an increase in men's sexually aggressive attitudes.

For you to call objections to The Century Project "wrongful" as you line your pockets with the money from sales of this book is a topic worthy of discussion.

 

10.08.2009 at 12:07 Reply
This is SICK!!!Exploiting women in this manner is wrong, especially that of a CHILD. Get a life

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close