Thursday, May 24

Oregonian's Sister Paper To Cease Daily Publication; Updated

News In another sign of the difficult financial realities for print newspapers, the New Orleans Times-Pic... More

May 24, 2012 09:20 am by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 0
 

Oregon Senators Back Bill Aimed At Citizens United

News Speaking of money in politics… U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) is among those speaking on the Senate... More

May 23, 2012 11:08 am by Corey Pein  | Comments 0
 

Schools Miss Out on $40 Million in Energy Savings

News An audit by the State of Oregon has found school districts missed out on $40 million of potential en... More

May 22, 2012 03:10 pm by CODY NEWTON  | Comments 0
 

Phil Knight Also Contributes To Higher Ed PAC

News We're not going to record every donation to the new political action committee called Oregonians for... More

May 22, 2012 08:44 am by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Noise In The ’Hood
March 10th, 2010 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

Noise In The ’Hood

The unexamined pros and cons of the proposed high-school redesign.

6 Comments
     
Tags:

IMAGE: Jonathan Hill

After more than two years of planning, the Portland School Board voted 5-2 Monday night to approve the broad outlines of a new high-school system for Portland Public Schools.

Superintendent Carole Smith now has 45 days to return to the board with a detailed proposal of the changes she envisions beginning in September 2011.

Unless the board finds an additional $4.5 million to $9 million a year in operating funds, one key detail already appears likely: the closure of two or three neighborhood high schools to balance enrollment across the remaining campuses.

The prospect of Portland’s first high-school closures since the 1980s has already produced strong opposition from parents who want all nine neighborhood high schools to remain open.

For the most part, the loudest critics have come from more affluent neighborhoods, such as those around Grant High in inner Northeast. Residents there fear that even if Grant stays open, Smith’s expected enrollment target of 1,350 students per high school will reduce Grant’s enrollment of about 1,600 and, as a result, eliminate some programs for the students who remain.

The opposite is possible at neighborhood schools like Marshall High in Lents. Marshall has fewer than 800 students spread across three so-called “small schools” within the school and could add programs as it adds students. “Schools like us, we’re thinking, ‘Oh, finally we’re going to get something for our kids,’” says Tricia Pietrzyk, mother of a Marshall senior.

Given the polarizing nature of what could happen to the current high schools’ haves and have-nots, two critical elements of the redesign—one good and one bad—have been completely overlooked. Until now.

PRO: Closure of small schools within schools would help immigrant and refugee students learning English.

Two of the nine neighborhood high-school campuses, Marshall in Southeast and Roosevelt in North Portland, are each divided into three small schools. Each small school contains between 186 and 309 students but is expected to offer the same range of programs as much larger Grant.

Further complicating matters, close to 20 percent of students at Marshall and Roosevelt are English-language learners, double the percentage for the rest of the district.

The small-schools model started in 2004 under then-Superintendent Vicki Phillips. The idea was to promote personalization. As a result, however, students couldn’t take classes in the other small schools on the same campus (even if they met across the hallway from one another).

Guidance counselors protested this policy. And a 2009 state audit of PPS programs for teaching English to foreign students confirmed their criticism; the audit found ELL students weren’t getting the academic or English help they needed, in part because of the artificial divisions. “Small schools haven’t worked for ELL kids,” says Kim Nguyen, a former Marshall guidance counselor who now manages the district’s family support center at Kelly Elementary School. “We don’t have a good critical mass to form good programs.”

The superintendent’s redesign would spell the end of PPS’s experiment with small schools as neighborhood schools. And it would end de facto segregation of immigrant and refugee students in separate small schools.

The change would not be enough, however, to make the district’s programs for ELL students automatically successful. “But we think this is a great first step,” says ELL teacher Kathy Paxton-Williams.

CON: The closure of certain neighborhood high schools would disrupt crucial programs funded by Multnomah County for low-income students.

Multnomah County currently serves about 4,000 high-school students in PPS through its county-funded health clinics and another 1,700 high-school students through its after-school programs.

The district’s discussion on high schools hasn’t publicly acknowledged this $3.3 million county investment in Portland’s high schools.

But right now the county has school-based health centers at Cleveland, Grant, Jefferson, Marshall, Madison and Roosevelt high schools.

Closure of any of those schools would greatly affect the county’s clinics, which provide students with free physical exams and sports physicals, prescriptions, as well as services for mental health and birth control. Each county clinic on a high-school campus has medical exam rooms and counseling rooms.

The county also employs a juvenile court counselor who works from Marshall to help students comply with court orders to attend school and vocational training.

“For kids who need those opportunities, it’s important,” says Pietrzyk, the mother at Marshall, of the county’s range of programs. “For families that have absolutely nothing, that would be crucial.”

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
03.10.2010 at 06:52 Reply
If we can pass a good national health plan, which seems dubious at this point, your 'con' won't matter.

 

03.10.2010 at 10:02 Reply
Portland Public Schools has profitted from parents like those in the Grant cluster remaining in public schools. The majority would question your description of "affluent." Middle-class, surely. Working hard and trying to keep a job in today's economy. And yes, they understand that in today's world, a college education is very important. They support public education with their actions-volunteering in the classroom and fundraising. Hardly glamorous. There are some who can write a check for private school and many who are looking to find more than 2% in their family budget (unlike PPS who is unwilling to do so) to get the best education for their kids, even if it means moving to private schools. They are loud and vocal because even the current offerings BARELY serve the majority of kids who are college bound. Yes, these same kids sit on buckets in overcrowed classrooms to get AP classes they can put on a college app. PPS must offer courses at their rate of learning - over 25% are identified in the Talented and Gifted Program. Shouldn't they be allowed to reach their potential just like the struggling students? Thank God someone like the Grant community is paying attention. The passage of the Superintendent's Resolution and the unbridled arrogance of the majority of our school board members will resonate

for years to come. With the exceptions of Director Williams and Director Gonzales, the Board blatantly ignored the will of the people. The same people who voted them into office answered their civic duty and sent emails asking for help, information, transparency,

accountabilty, measurements, answers, details, numbers, etc.only to be

ignored, ridiculed, chastised or reprimanded.

Enough is enough.

Where we go from here is a huge question. We know that we have an

errant Board and a Superintendent, while well-meaning, does not seem

to have the leadership ability to execute even the simplest of tasks.

Four years later, we are still waiting for answers on the K-8

reconfiguration. So many high schools and their communities have been

left in the dust as the Redesign intellectualizes the process without

any measurable actions. It is unconscionable. If this was a business,

Carole Smith would be and should be fired.

So don't blame Grant for being engaged in the process. It's easy to point fingers if your kid isn't in the game.

 

03.10.2010 at 10:53 Reply
It's interesting that the two Directors who voted against the Resolution were people of color.

 

03.11.2010 at 10:06 Reply
The Powers That Be at PPS still don't get it!

In order for students to be successful, there must be parental and family involvement. Parents must be able to buy in to what is going on in their child's classroom(s). Over and over, I've seen the schools blatantly ignore parents who want to see their child(ren) succeed; or not doing enough to encourage parents to be involved with their children and the school.

I helped develop a Parents in the Schools program many years ago in Fairfax County VA (which received commendation in a CBS special), but my ideas were rebuffed by PPS because "You're just a mom and don't have the background that our administrators have."

Okay ... a few years down the line: "just a mom's" kids are medical professionals, grandchildren are honor students and parental involvement works just fine in their schools (not PPS).

As I see more experimentation coming down the pike, my heart hurts for the kids in PPS whose parents can't send them to private schools.

 

03.11.2010 at 03:46 Reply
Get rid of school choice. Kids go to school in their neighborhood. Enrollment balances out, schools can offer more complete programs, Grant isn't overcrowded, and people actual become a part of the community where they live. Once that is done, close the smallest schools (not counting the big schools divided into "small schools" - they're still big schools people) because there obviously isn't a population to sustain those schools.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close