Portland Police Advise iPhone Users Not To Stare, Zombielike, At Their Devices
News Portland police yesterday announced that they'd caught that most elusive brand of criminal, the smar... More
May 25, 2012 12:32 pm by COREY PEIN | Comments 0
Oswego Lake Access Issue Heads to Federal Court
Lawsuit says the city has a responsibility to “protect and preserve the public’s right of access to and use of the Lake.”
News A federal judge may decide if Oswego Lake is open to the public. A lawsuit filed this morning in U.... More
May 24, 2012 01:16 pm by Martin Cizmar | Comments 8
Oregonian's Sister Paper To Cease Daily Publication; Updated
News In another sign of the difficult financial realities for print newspapers, the New Orleans Times-Pic... More
May 24, 2012 09:20 am by NIGEL JAQUISS | Comments 2
Oregon Senators Back Bill Aimed At Citizens United
News Speaking of money in politics… U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) is among those speaking on the Senate... More
May 23, 2012 11:08 am by Corey Pein | Comments 0


I didn't know it was illegal to wade in the Keller Fountain. In fact I very specifically remember the City proposing to do so, getting massive protests from citizens including Columnist Doug Baker. The City then backed off from the proposed ordinance. Well they must have snuck a new one through on the consent calendar opne day.
Also City Parks are for all City residents, including little children. My suggestion is that if being near children bothers you. Go somewhere else. You think public parks were built only for you?
Dr. know is a moron
There's absoutely no doubt about Halprin's intent. The main reason the fountain is on the National Register of Historic Places is because it was meant to be played in! That's the point! Gee whiz. The city appears not to understand the value of its own assets.
Marty, I took the trouble to contact the city and the co-founder of the Halprin Conservancy, and here is the correct information: the city discourages but does not prohibit people wading and swimming in the Keller Fountain. The signs are carefully worded to reflect that. The city is aware that the fountain is designed for play, and it will NOT be stepping up enforcement of the no-swimming policy. There is no such policy.
Would you consider a correction?