Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · AT&T Wireless
January 21st, 2004 WW Editorial Staff | Rogue of the Week
 

AT&T Wireless

1 Comments
     
Tags:
AT&T Wireless
When the Federal Communications Commission announced in late November that cell-phone users could keep their old numbers when swapping service providers, many cellheads thought, "What a marvelous, simple idea."

Among the ranks of the rejoicing was Greshamite Quinn Rose-Blum.

Rose-Blum switched from T-Mobile to AT&T Wireless on Nov. 28, shortly after the "portability" plan went into effect. She was impressed by AT&T's superior coverage in the Portland area and calmed by its assurances of easy switching from her old plan.

If only she had known.

The AT&T rep told her service could be switched in a matter of hours (a few days in the worst cases), but at the start of December, Rose-Blum still had not been switched to the new service. So, on Dec. 3, she called AT&T's customer-service number on her new phone (she could still make outgoing calls but not receive incoming ones). Rose-Blum continued calling AT&T every other day for about six weeks, being swapped around by clueless customer- service reps on the call-center floor. None could explain what was happening, except to blame T-Mobile for the delay.

Rose-Blum was frustrated but not fuming. That is, until last week, when she received a bill from AT&T asking for $233 to pay for the 583 minutes she'd spent on the phone listening to empty promises and elevator music, especially when she's been told repeatedly that she wouldn't have to pay a dime. When she called to complain, she was told there were too many calls for AT&T to reverse the charges.

Rose-Blum has since filed a dispute with the billing department. And apparently she's not alone. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that AT&T has shown a 60 percent "portability error rate," one of the highest in the industry.

When Rogue Central called AT&T for comment, we were greeted by a dazed operator who referred us to another phone number--one that, according to a friendly recorded voice, "has been disconnected or is no longer in service."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
01.27.2004 at 10:00 Reply
ATT "Superior Coverage" mythATT was MUCH better 3 YEARS AGO! New plans "bundle Roaming" into the Plan* >>Fact is where ATT "used" to Roam ---> Now it says "No Service" coverage is Down 30% of what ATT was*ATT will "pull the cork" on a Cell Phone Tower (Troutdale) not tell anyone. Your Service goes to -none-* Only with Complaints - to India - call centers may restore service* Your friendly ATT retailer is "commission only" - NOT a lot of knowledge/incentive to help you* It may be that ATT layed off -all- employees who knew anything about technology, or follow through.* ATT lost money because of software glitchs, preventing new accounts w number portibility- the whole company is for sale, and in trouble.--> AWS- Stockholder—mark

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close