Sunday, February 12

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Home, Sweet Home
January 11th, 2006 NIGEL JAQUISS | News
 

Home, Sweet Home

Will Portland extend a tax break for homeowners?

7 Comments
     
Tags:

IMAGE: THOMAS COBB
At a time when the City of Portland is considering an income-tax surcharge for all residents to raise money for schools, it's also mulling whether to extend millions in tax breaks to a mostly affluent group of homeowners.

A new state law went into effect last week, allowing cities to grant an additional 15-year property-tax freeze for the owners of residences designated historic. Previously, historic properties lost that tax break after 15 years and were then assessed like other properties.

House Bill 2776 comes at an opportune time for some Portlanders. Records show nearly half of the 208 single-family Portland residences currently getting the break began receiving it in 1991, which means their 15-year tax holiday expires this year.

Among those facing a hefty property-tax hike next year are property heir Jordan Schnitzer, top criminal defense lawyer Steve Houze and über-lobbyist Len Bergstein (see chart).

Owners of historic homes can qualify for an additional 15-year freeze simply by applying to the State Historic Preservation Office. But there's a catch: Property owners may receive the extended benefits only after their city approves the new law.

"We're supportive of the extension, but we're not going to pressure cities to pass this," says Susan Haylock of the Historic Preservation Office.

If Portland City Council ratifies the extension, the homes whose breaks expire in 2006 would be revalued to reflect some, but not all, of the increase in market value since 1991. Depending on the home, taxes could double or even quadruple but would then be frozen again for 15 years. All that's needed to qualify for the freeze is to pay an application fee of one-third of 1 percent of the property's real market value, file a maintenance plan, and hold an annual public open house.

House Minority Leader Jeff Merkley, D-Portland, voted against extending the program because the deductions appear to be going to a small group of affluent and influential people. "I suspect that none of these residences would be destroyed anyway," Merkley says, "so we're giving a break to those most able to pay taxes, for no additional benefit.''

City planner Nicholas Starin is researching the fiscal and policy impact of an extension. The estimated cost of the single-family historic-property tax benefit was not immediately available, but The Oregonian reported in November that historic tax breaks cost Multnomah County about $6.5 million annually. Starin wants to finish his work in time to get on the Feb. 27 agenda of the city's Historical Landmarks Commission, which will then present a recommendation to the City Council.

Mayor Tom Potter has made supplemental school funding a top priority. And since he ran a low-budget election campaign without much help from those who own pricy, historic residences, he's in position to put kids ahead of tax breaks. Mayoral spokesman John Doussard says his boss will wait for the research before commenting. But Commissioner Erik Sten, a longtime advocate for more spending on low-income housing, says,"I don't think this extension should be a priority for the council."

Nearly half the Portland homes with historic-tax deductions will lose that freebie in 2006 unless City Council acts. Here's a sampling:
Name'HoodClaim to FameReal Market Value2005 tax
Jordan SchnitzerDunthorpeProperty heir$4.75 million$13,311
Jim CrumpackerDunthorpeCommercial Realtor$3.42 million$12,422
Albert GentnerSW HillsFormer hotelier$2.76 million$11,237
Greg HinckleySW HillsPresident, Mentor Graphics$2.39 million$9,357
Stephen HouzeSW HillsDefense lawyer$1.05 million$6,134
Len BergsteinGoose HollowLobbyist$582,000$3,429
Average PortlanderSoutheast Loves WW$244,000$2,970
Sources: Oregon State Historic Preservation Office; Multnomah County
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
01.10.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Home, Sweet HomeNigel,I can clearly see the point of your article but you've made the program out to be a scam for the rich.We purchased the 1902 William L. Brester House on NW Lovejoy in September from a family that had owned it since the 19040s. The house is a "contributing property" to the Alphabet District but was not a part of the tax abatement program when we bought it. The program was a major factor in us being able to afford the purchase and the substantial remodel that is still currently underway. The seller sold to us, at a lower price than another offer, because we were going to save the home. The other buyer was going to tear it down and build condos; a much more profitable option. So I'd have to, respectfully, disagree with Jeff Merkley when he says that the program has not saved a historic home. The decision between teardown and restoring was close.You state:"All that's needed to qualify for the freeze is to pay an application fee of one-third of 1 percent of the property's real market value, file a maintenance plan, and hold an annual public open house." Our application was about 40 pages detailing how we are preserving, restoring and improving the house. We have ongoing communication with the State Historic Preservation Office as the project progresses. I probably spent close to 80 hours putting it together and my wife has spent about that much time again going through Portland's Design Review process. The majority of our exterior work is stalled while we go through the permit process that was started in September. Filing a maintenance plan also means carrying it out. The program prevents all of us who are a part of the program from just doing what we want or choosing the cheapest option. We are trying our hardest to do what is best for the property while making it a comfortable home to live in. Just because it made sense in 1902 and through subsequent remodels does not make for a comfortable home today. The program allows for the assessment of previously abated taxes for failing to follow through. Enforcement of that, I cannot speak to.The program is doing for us what it was designed to do. If it is being abused by others, that is your real story, not just a generalization that we are all in it for a "tax holiday."Charles and Jennifer Turner www.PortlandRealEstateBlog.com—Charles Turner

 

01.11.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Home, Sweet HomeI see.We all get to pay more taxes in order to preserve these historic structures for, essentially, their occupants.Poor things. —rickyragg

 

01.11.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Home, Sweet HomeIt is absolutely ignorant of Jeff Merkley to insist that none of the houses receiving tax abatements would be torn down. I can think of several examples of historic properties that have been lost or are endangered because of eager developers in this city. I applaud the efforts of the Turners in northwest Portland to preserve their home from these same pressures. If it means a tax break in order to get people to save historic properties from demolition then so be it. The real story ought to be how to make this incentive easier for all residents of the city/state to earn, thereby preserving more and more historic properties along the way.In regards to the concerns over school funding, city/state leaders should take a hard look at why families are moving out of the city. The repeated encouragement of condo development does little to stopthe bleeding in this arena.Val BallestremSoutheast Portland—Val Ballestrem

 

01.11.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Home, Sweet HomeI am a Produce Delivery Truck Driver. Of the few things I have done right in my lifetime, one was when I cashed in everything I had in 1994 for a down payment on a 1400 sq. foot historic home in Southeast Portland. My wife and I have an average combined income of about $40k. My wife has not had a raise in 8 years. But we do have an historic dwelling and qualify for the tax break you wrote about. But now Nigel Jaquis, my favorite journalist at the moment, has lumped me in with Jordan Schnitzer and Greg Hinckley and other rich Portlanders. What did I do to deserve this?With the tax savings I get for having an historic home, I have been able to restore my house to much of its original character. Every May my neighbors and I (none of whom are excedingly wealthy as far as I know) have the Ladds Addition Tour of Historic Homes, which doubles as a fund raiser to save the elm trees in our neighborhood. Hundreds of regular folks file through to enjoy the tour of our proudly upkept old houses. These are people who all share a love of old architecture. I don't have too many things I can say I am proud of, but one of them is that I have painstakingly restored this house to its modest and historic character thanks in large part to the help facilitated by the Special Assessment Program, the State Historic Preservation Office, and the National Register of Historic Places. The extension of the program will help me to continue to upgrade this place for the enhancement of the urban beauty of Portland, and not just to give a tax cut for the rich. You wield a mighty pen, Nigel. But come on, man. Give me a break. I'm just a bike-riding, truck-driver shmoe from Southeast Portland with one measly tax break to his name.—Bob Bugas

 

01.13.2006 at 10:00 Reply
Is It Not Self-Evident That I Am A Pauper And That I Warrant A Property Tax Deduction???I, Mentor Graphics president Hinckly, have recently eliminated bonuses for employees below management status. This way I, Hinckley have saved Mentor Graphics an estimated $1.4 million. I, Hinckley have reduced Management level and above bonuses by 5%. This saves an estimated 2.5 million dollars. Any surprise that a guy like me, who screws my workers out of bonuses, would screw the property tax payers?You should actually admire and wish to emulate Me, Hinckley. $1 Million dollar plus salary; $2.4 million dollar house. Is it not self-evident to you reader, that I, Hinckly am a poor pauper and that I clearly warrant a property-tax deduction???You should all aspire to my level of creative scamming. No reason to let Me, Hinckley receive all the credit.—Greg Hinckley

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close