Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Starving Art
May 17th, 2006 Ian Demsky | News
 

Starving Art

Everclear's Art Alexakis is trying to lower his payments to his ex-wives.

50 Comments
     
Tags:
Art Alexakis
Claiming his finances are in dire straits, Everclear frontman Art Alexakis wants to reduce support payments he makes to his two ex-wives.

Alexakis—once Portland's most celebrated and reviled post-grunge musician—filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last year, primarily because he owes more than $2.3 million in state and federal taxes, according to a court filing by one of his ex-wives.

Ex-wife Stephanie Greig says in recent court filings that Alexakis stopped paying her $1,500 monthly support payments and monthly rent on the former couple's Mount Hood cabin in December 2005. Greig also says she had to pawn a ring in order to pay off $19,000 in legal bills she racked up protecting her interests in Alexakis' bankruptcy case in California, according to memos filed earlier this month in Multnomah County Circuit Court.

Greig, Alexakis' wife for nearly four years, is asking the court to award her $22,500 in back payments plus interest.

"In addition to his profligate personal spending habits (notwithstanding his alleged insolvency), [Alexakis] spent thousands of dollars in attorney's fees to avoid having to fulfill his obligations to [Greig] and has in turn forced [Greig] to retain attorneys to defend her interests," her attorney, Brett Bender, argues in court filings.

Greig recently quit a waitress job at Portland's Vindalho restaurant to pursue an acting career in Los Angeles, court records say.

For his part, Alexakis, 44, argues in court papers that his income fell from $1.4 million in 2001 to $223,700 in 2003. At the end of 2004, Capitol Records ended his recording contract, causing him not to get an expected $750,000 advance.

Court records say the $66,000 he made from Broadcast Music Inc., or BMI, went to pay off debts and that the IRS holds a lien on all his other assets. He argues that these debts prevent him from being able to pay Greig's $1,500 monthly spousal support, and that the payments should stop or be reduced because his ex has had adequate time to readjust to her post-marriage life.

"The fact [Greig] has chosen to work only 19 to 20 hours per week and travel extensively is her choice alone and should have no bearing on whether [Alexakis'] spousal support obligation should continue," his attorney Richard Funk argues in a court memo.

Attempts to contact the musician through Funk, Alexakis' managers, and another Alexakis attorney in California, Michael Holst, were unsuccessful at press time. But the lead singer got wind that WW was researching a story on the support-payment dispute and posted a reaction on myspace.com.

"[S]tephanie wrote the i r s , asking for 'innocent spouse relief'...claiming she never benefited from the money i made back in the day," Alexakis wrote. "[i]t's ludicrous! she lived like a queen....she was a 21 year old driving an $80,000 jag taking acting classes and waking up at noon to hang out with her friends."

Meanwhile, another Alexakis ex-wife, Jennifer Dodson Paget, is fighting his attempts to reduce his monthly child-support payments for their 13-year-old daughter, Anna. Paget's attorney, Catherine Carroll, did not return WW's calls.

WEB UPDATE:

Holtz, Alexakis' attorney, spoke with Alexakis on Tuesday but did not return WW's call after until press time.

Alexakis disputes how much money he owes to Greig and is letting legal proceedings take their course.

"What the judge says he should pay, he'll pay," Holtz says.

Regarding reductions to his daughter's child-support payments, Holtz says Alexakis currently pays $3,000 a month in child support plus $1,200 private-school tuition, as well as her insurance. And he plans to put her through a private high school.

His monthly payments would be about $500 a month if calculated based upon his current income, Holtz says.

"He loves his daughter more than anything," Holtz says. "There's a bigger picture here."

Debts, his generosity towards his daughter and caring for his ailing mother until her death earlier this year—not rock-star excesses—have put Alexakis in the unfortunate position of needing to ask for the payment reduction, Holtz says.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
05.16.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Starving ArtYou should get both sides of a story before putting it in print. If Art wasn't a "rockstar" he probably could get his payments to Stephanie dropped or reduced with no problem. There was a significant change in income since that agreement was made.I know Anna is everyhing to Art and will do what he can to support her!!!—Joanne

 

05.16.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Starving ArtCongradulations on being able to write a story trying to slander a great musician and failing. Art from just this story alone is a great man who is doing anything he can for his daughter. Yes he needs his payments reduced to the childs mother, but he is also paying for private schooling and insurance. He is there for his child when so many other fathers in the world dont care let alone pay for private school. As for Stephanie having to pawn a ring to pay for lawyer bills. Good one maybe if she had a job she could pay for it without pawning stuff. She lived off of Art for 4 years. 4 years is time to finish a training course or college to get a better job than waitressing. She could have gotten acting lessons in 4 years so that she would have an acting career and support herself. She comes across as a greedy rutheless person in my opinion, I hope the judge awards what Art is asking for and laughs, yes laughs, in Stephanies face. This is only my opinion but I am sure many might agree with me on this, that the article was only run in the paper to try and get sympathy from Stephanie who doesnt deserve it. Best wishes to Art and Anna, that they keep their heads held high when so many people wish them bad.—Sarah

 

05.16.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Starving ArtI have yet to hear Arts full side of the story. If Stephnie needs all this money, she should be working a job she can get.

 

05.16.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Starving ArtWelcome to adulthood Steph. We all have to make our own way in the world. I have deteriorating meniscus in my knee and I have had carpal tunnel release in both hands. Yet, I still go to work 5 days a week at UPS. It isnt always easy but I would never ask someone else including the government to pay my way through life. You need to wake up and get a real job. Do you have any idea how many people waste their lives with the dream of acting. Stop trying to play on sympathy and take charge of your life.—bonnie

 

05.16.2006 at 09:00 Reply
Starving ArtThere is no doubt that Art is getting a royal screwing from his second wife Stephanie pertaining to support payments. First she is a young very attractive woman,second they have no children together, and third she is quite capable of getting a position in society. That's a nice way of saying, the vacation is over go to work! I can understand the concept of temporary alimony that is to be used to assist the former spouse in getting herself back into the workforce with updating her skills, etc, however, this type of support has a beginning and an end. I feel Art has fulfilled this responsibility a long time ago.Pertaining to first wife Jennifer, Art's motion to reduce his child support payments from $3000.00 per month should definitely be approved. Child support should be based on total joint income. Anyone who knows Art is aware of how much he loves his daughter Anna. There is no question of that and Art is not trying to avoid his father responsibilities. He is not and never will be a dead beat Dad. This is not about love but about finances. Child support is determined based on the joint income of both parents. There is no mention if Jennifer works or has means towards income, interest etc. Art's income has dramatically been reduced and so should his financial child support obligations. —Cassie's Dad

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close