Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Q & A · David Rogers
April 11th, 2007 JAMES PITKIN | Q & A
 

David Rogers

A Measure 11 critic thinks the time's ripe for a second look at mandatory sentencing for juveniles.

4 Comments
     
Tags:
Oregon's prison population has doubled since 1994 to about 13,000 inmates. The state's population has increased about 17 percent in that same time.??
Oregon has at least 300 kids ages 15, 16 and 17 who have been treated as adults under Measure 11.
Rogers became executive director of the Partnership for Safety and Justice in December 2006.??

IMAGE: THOMAS COBB
Fourteen years after Oregon voters approved Measure 11, David Rogers believes they're ready to revisit the idea.

Rogers, director of the Portland-based nonprofit Partnership for Safety and Justice, will begin to learn this week if he's right.

His group has two bills up for legislative hearings Wednesday, April 11. Both are designed to soften the effect on juveniles of Measure 11, which made some felonies punishable by mandatory minimum sentences—including for youths over 15.

HB 2904—a so-called "second look" bill—would give judges the option of letting prisoners serve the second half of their sentence in the community if they were convicted as a juvenile under Measure 11.

SB 1014 would let judges decide if youths charged with a Measure 11 crime should be tried as adults.

WW spoke with Rogers about his opposition to Measure 11 and what his organization's proposals would mean for young offenders.

WW: What good has Measure 11 done?

David Rogers: Measure 11 really is a deeply problematic set of policies.

I know you feel that way. I want to know if you think removing judicial discretion and creating set sentences for a certain set of crimes has done anything of value for the citizens of Oregon.

I think it would be a real stretch to say that.

And to people who suggest Measure 11 is one of the reasons the crime rate has gone down, would you say you disagree or it doesn't matter?

You can't in any concrete way make a connection between the passage of Measure 11 and the reduction in crime rates that Oregon has experienced.

Because?

First of all, starting in the mid-'90s, crime rates have been trending downward around the country. There have been plenty of studies to show that there isn't really a direct relationship between incarceration rates and crime rates. If you look at the same time period, shortly after the passage of Measure 11—in New York, California, Washington state and Oregon—what you'll see is that Oregon's incarceration rate is four times that of those states. Yet those states have experienced similar reductions in crime.

Has your organization done any polling on this issue?

Yeah.

And what do Oregonians feel?

It's worth noting that a year ago we commissioned a [poll] on a range of criminal-justice issues, and 61 percent of registered, likely voters in the state of Oregon support a second look for youth convicted of a Measure 11 sentence. The public is already there. That's what I want to tell you. From an emotional perspective, do we actually have to move people? I would suggest not.

So why not take it to the ballot?

Oftentimes legislators have abdicated their responsibility to actually legislate on difficult issues. These are policy issues that legislators should feel comfortable taking a position on. And they can't just be afraid of anything that's criminal-justice related, and anything that's sentencing-reform related.

Are there cases where you think youths should be tried as adults in adult court?

I think the decision should be made on a case-by-case basis. I very much believe a judge is an appropriate person to be able to make that decision. That's what their job is.

Under your group's bills, will there still be cases where youths will be tried as adults?

Absolutely. This doesn't create a free pass by any means. When things have happened that are really scary and egregious and a young person seems like they are a major threat to safety, I imagine that a judge will decide that young person should definitely be treated in adult court. What Senate Bill 1014 does is it creates a thoughtful process to make sure young people don't slip through the cracks.


For more information about the bills, go to safetyandjustice.org.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
04.11.2007 at 07:44 Reply
All children under age of 18, cases should always be held in a "juvenile" court of law, for the "child" they are. If, in fact guilty of a crime, punishment is warranted, however, but "as a child", NOT with being tried as an adult, they "clearly" are not. Brain functions and development have NOT reached the maturity level until a person is in their early twenties according to medical articles and statistics.

Children can change, can be "rehabilitated, if placed in the "right structured" enviornment, for them to learn discipline, educational and productive things in their lives, which many never had the opportunity to do so in their young lives. With the "right" counseling, education, and rehabilitative efforts, these children "can" become "productive" members of society, if ONLY "given" that ONE CHANCE.

kidsincourt.net

Child Justice Advocacy

 

04.11.2007 at 03:15 Reply
I must say that children are punished the harshest in this country and for the life of me I don't understand WHY? I know that they have gotten themselves into trouble and need to take responsibility for their crimes. What I don't understand is why society is so eager to toss such young lives away without ever giving them the chance to be rehabilitated so they can redeem themselves. If anyone should be given a chance to be rehabilitated it should be a child. Children make mistakes, but given the right tools and the right teachers they can change their ways! Children are never ADULTS and therefore should never be treated as such! Help save their lives..... aren't children worth the effort? They should be!!

Stacey

 

05.15.2007 at 06:05 Reply
The interview fails to mention one of the most troubling aspects of Measure 11: mandatory sentencing makes the stakes of losing a trial so high, that the majority of Measure 11 cases never actually go to trial. Instead, public defenders usually recommend to their (juvenile) clients that they take a plea bargain to avoid the harshest sentence. For example, a teenager might be told to take a four year plea to avoid the risk of a trial that could result in a 7-year sentence if unsuccesful. That is, most of these teenagers, having only been charged, not convicted, of crimes, are going to prison without a trial. This type of sentencing process not only takes the power out of the judiciary - whose hands are bound by this law when sentencing - but deprives citizens the due process of law. It is, at it's core, a constitutional issue.

 

01.15.2010 at 01:35 Reply
Wake up people! measure 11, doesn't work for Juvenal s! why call kids, kids if you want to punish them as adults, what if your brother, sister, friend,niece,nephew son,daughter, was sentenced under measure 11? would you still fill the same? really take a moment to really,really feel the pain,that goes with this measure! not just for the child, but the families that love them,you too could be on the receiving end one day! and trust me you cant even imagine what the families go through! think about gods grace he forgave us? and still does everyday.what if he judge us under measure 11?

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close