Monday, February 13

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 3
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 

Almost Live: Rockets at Blazers

News So I'm having a bit of trouble with the picture, which is coming from my phone (I drew it on my way ... More

Feb 8, 2012 07:09 pm by CASEY JARMAN  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Braking The Fixie
July 11th, 2007 Nicholas Deshais | News
 

Braking The Fixie

After the Legislature failed to fix the "fixies" law, the tickets continue to fly in Portland.

167 Comments
     
Tags:
GET UP, STAND UP, stand up for your bike.

Like in a Richard Scarry book, downtown Portland on a weekday afternoon bustles with many forms of transportation. Buses pass pedestrians who just got off the MAX, and taxis roll through stop signs while cars line up on Burnside.

Unlike a children's book utopia, however, not everyone's happy with all the ways to get around. Zipping through traffic, fixed-gear bikes, or "fixies," continue to be ticketed by Portland police for what the cops consider equipment violations.

The ongoing ticketing highlights the Legislature's recent failure to clear up legal ambiguities around the bikes, which are brought to a stop by the application of back pressure on the pedals instead of more common hand or coaster brakes. The legs of the cyclist, coupled with the bike's gearing, act as a brake.

Local bike advocacy lawyer Mark Ginsberg worked with Oregon legislators in the just-concluded session to fix matters with Senate Bill 729. That bill included a provision that said fixed-gear bicycles are "not required to be equipped with a separate brake."

"We just spent a lot of time in the Legislature, and we thought we had it clarified," says Ginsberg.

But the fixies clause in the larger bill dealing with bikes died in the Judiciary Conference Committee after Sen. Ginny Burdick (D-Southwest Portland) stripped it out. A local bike blog, bikeportland.org, reports that Burdick's daughter lobbied her not to green-light the surge of inexperienced fixie riders.

"After it initially went through, I had a lot of reservations," Burdick said in an interview with Jonathan Maus, editor of Bikeportland. "My own daughter (who works at River City Bicycles in Portland) rides fixies on the velodrome. She jumped on me pretty hard and said there were a lot of people on fixies who really don't know what they're doing, so changing the standard across the board would not be a good idea."

River City Bicycles sells one type of fixed-gear bicycle without brakes. All its other models come with brakes. Most bike shops in Portland that offer fixies, including Bike Gallery and Bike N' Hike, sell them with brakes.

Sleek and simple, fixies have become popular with everyone from couriers to a hipper sect of the bike commuter set. At the same time, some of these cyclists claim police, exploiting a vaguely written fixies provision left untouched by the Legislature, are targeting them.

"They're real selective about who they give tickets to," says Matthew Henry, 23, a bike messenger who has been ticketed five times for riding a "brakeless" bike. Citations cost $97 apiece.

"They're focusing on the messengers," says Tab Bamford, an independent bike courier. "And they're the ones who actually know how to ride these bikes."

Portland police estimate that they give anywhere between four and 10 citations a week for "bicycle equipment violations," the infraction given to fixed-gear bicycles not equipped with a standard brake. But police insist they do not target specific people.

"Most of these guys are messengers running from building to building downtown, and that's where I am," says Officer Bret Barnum, a motorcycle cop. "We're not out to target people."

Bamford, 30, has been a messenger for over six years and has twice won the North American Cycle Courier Championships, first in 2002 in Houston and then in 2003 in Washington, D.C. While he feels that messengers are being unfairly penalized, he realizes the bikes can be dangerous under the heels of the inexperienced. Without the proper strength, the bikes are hard to stop. Portland police say legs aren't brakes.

"In the interest of public safety, you do need a separate mechanism," says Barnum. He and Officer Bill Balzer, another Portland motorcycle cop, hand out over 90 percent of the citations in question. He says the way the law is written "leaves it open for interpretation" and that he reads the law as requiring "an independent mechanism that allows the bike to stop."

Not everyone, however, reads it that way. Currently, Oregon Revised Statutes 815.280(2)(a) says a bike "must be equipped with a brake that enables the operator to make the braked wheels skid on dry, level, clean pavement." On Jan. 1, SB 729 clarified the law a bit. Instead of skidding, cyclists must show they can stop within 15 feet going 10 mph.

"What does 'equipped' mean? What does 'brake' mean?" Ginsberg says. "Nowhere does it say you need a mechanical caliper brake."

State Sen. Jason Atkinson (R-Central Point), who worked closely with Ginsberg on SB 729 last session, raced bikes professionally for eight years before he "went through a windshield and went into politics."

"A large number of people don't understand how many fixies there are and how safe they are," says Atkinson, the original sponsor of the bill.

But Barnum disagrees, saying that it's "about safety for everybody."

"The silent majority have said, 'Hey, guys, put your brake on and you're good to go,'" he says. "The vocal minority are the same 20, 25 people who refuse to do this."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
07.11.2007 at 09:07 Reply
The problem is that any of the messengers given these tickets CAN "skid on dry, level, clean pavement" and CAN "stop within 15 feet going 10 mph" no problem. If the Barnum and Balzer Circus wants to give messengers tickets, they should have plenty of opportunities to give them for moving violations. It is just much easier to pull up next to them as they are just riding along slowly coming back from a run than trying to chase them down as they fly down the street with complete disregard for traffic laws.

If you ask someone to stop, and they stop for you without dragging their feet, that indicates the presence of a braking device, unless they have the ability to defy the laws of inertia (a body in motion stays in motion). A fixed gear hub allows you to slow your bike by slowing your pedaling, and allows you to stop by stopping your pedaling. That is a brake, it functions as a brake. It's that simple.

 

07.11.2007 at 10:29 Reply
Note that Officer Barnum's personal interpretation of the statute was found not persuasive before a Judge yet he continues to write these tickets irrespectively.

John

 

07.11.2007 at 01:04 Reply
Hmmm...sounds to me like another plost to keep the average citizen paying fines and our police who's duty is to "protect and serve" abusing their role, and taking the law into their own hands. Then again, what else is new. Most the time I have a problem and I contact the police they are more than willing to offer me no assistance at all, and completely ignore the fact there is an issue.

 

07.12.2007 at 01:20 Reply
This is just another example of how inconsiderate of others the 'hipster' population in Portland can be. Being able reliably stop a bicycle is not really about YOU. It is about the right of pedestrians and others not to be injured by you as you attempt to bring a bike without brakes to a halt. A tiny minority should not be allowed to endanger the rest of us.

The statute is clearly referring to an object, not the person riding the bike. That object is a braking mechanism. I do believe the statute should be clarified to avoid the obfuscation that is occurring by fixie advocates. Their argument is equivalent to claiming one's anus is an air supply because one passes gas. Just plain silly.

Furthermore, having spoiled rich brat, lobbyist loving Jason Atkinson, who has never done an honest day's work in his life, as spokesperson heightens the self-centered, 'to hell with others' attitude of the fixie promoters.

 

07.12.2007 at 05:30 Reply
Meanwhile, back in reality, a fixed-gear bike cannot stop worth a damn, because it has no brakes on the front.

This means that the rear wheel will skid instantly when the rider tries to stop hard, and he will NOT be able to stop nearly as fast as a bike equipped with front-wheel brakes.

I fail to see how morons trying to shave 6 oz. of weight on their "fashionable" fixies have a right to ride a vehicle that endangers the rest of us. Fixies are suitable for racing on an indoor track. Period.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close