Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 2
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Sitting Ducks
August 8th, 2007 Don Mcintosh | News
 

Sitting Ducks

Employee safety complaints mount against an ATM service company.

32 Comments
     
Tags:

In spring 2006, Kurt Page got a $12-an-hour job at an armored car company in Oregon.

Page thought it might be glamorous work—uniform, gun, hopping out of an armored car and scanning the perimeter, then hauling off bagfuls of cash. Instead, Page ended up with what he and other co-workers consider an uncaring employer in Pendum Inc., a privately held, Illinois-headquartered ATM service company formed in January 2006.

"Odds are, eventually somebody's going to get hurt," says Page, who filed a multipart complaint in late June with Oregon's Occupational Safety and Health Division (also called OSHA). "And the people that are in charge that could make a difference sit in an air-conditioned office all day."

While most ATMs nationally are serviced by banks or the ATMs' manufacturers, Pendum is the largest of about 60 independent ATM service companies. A big part of its business is picking up deposits and replenishing cash at free-standing ATMs for convenience-store chains and small banks.

Page, 40, worked in Pendum's unmarked Ford Econoline vans as a "hopper." Hoppers get out and put cash in ATMs. And Page says he'd sit in back with several hundred thousand to several million dollars at a time.

Drivers are walled off from hoppers and communicate by walkie-talkie. Each must press a button simultaneously for the back door to unlock and the hopper to exit.

Page says he felt unsafe inside because if the driver were to fall asleep at the wheel, the hopper would be trapped. Once, Page said, the lock malfunctioned and it took a locksmith to get him out. He also says that employees sometimes made the rounds in an ordinary Enterprise rental van, and that vans went out with dodgy brakes or wobbly steering.

A Pendum area official declined to comment, but two co-workers backed up Page's account. "I [felt] like a target sometimes when I was putting cash in machines," says one of them, Kathleen Pearce, who filed an OSHA complaint in July and was fired Aug. 2. "I was standing outside with bags full of thousands of dollars."

While Page felt unsafe inside the van, he was more scared outside the van. Pendum drivers remain at the wheel when hoppers get out. And unlike at some other companies, there was no third crew member to serve as an armed guard when Page was on his knees with his back turned, loading tens of thousands of dollars into convenience-store ATMs.

Pendum doesn't require or provide armored vests, though Page and Pearce say the company will loan employees the $600 to $1,000 they need to buy one. It also doesn't provide employees a gun, which they are required to carry, though again it will lend them the money to buy one.

Pearce says a Pendum manager loaned her a gun when she started, and told her to tuck it under the seat. If true, that runs afoul of Oregon law, because Pearce didn't have the state certification to carry a gun on the job.

When the company failed to respond within the required 10 days to Page's OSHA complaint, Page emailed two Pendum clients on July 15—Oregon Community Credit Union and First Tech Credit Union.

"I said, '... I think you should know your money's being transported in unarmored rental vans,'" Page recalls.

An irate OCCU manager called Pendum the next day. Page was suspended and then, on July 19, fired.

The following week he filed a complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries, alleging he was fired for blowing the whistle to OSHA. Noted trial lawyer Judy Snyder has agreed to take Page's case.

If retaliation is proven, the employer can be subject to paying economic damages as well as punitive damages assessed by an administrative law judge, says BOLI spokesman Marc Zolton.

Pendum wrote back to OSHA, denying each of Page's claims, at which point the agency dropped the case without an inspection.

"That was a decision made by our safety manager in Portland, who looked at the written evidence and determined there wasn't anything Oregon OSHA could do," says OSHA spokesman Kevin Weeks. "There wouldn't be a lot they could evaluate because Oregon OSHA doesn't have specific standards for the armored-car industry."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
08.08.2007 at 08:24 Reply
Ric
While I find most of the statements in the article horrendous and a huge safety issue, as someone who worked in the security business the requirement for employees to buy their own weapons is actually fairly standard and actually preferred. The cost of purchase and upkeep is deductible, and a company issued weapon may not be reliable. Plus you get to choose a weapon that is a good fit for you. However the lack of training and certification bothers me greatly.

 

08.08.2007 at 09:52 Reply
I am the "2nd" employee in the article. My company denied I was fired. I couldn't believe it. No, of course I could. I was yelled at for 10 minutes straight my last day. I was told I was "malicious". ....all for writing on a printout left in the break room asking if the side doors of the armored trucks were fully plated. I was told when I refused to follow my irate and shaking manager to give back my keys and "go". I liked the work I was doing. Sure my car ran out of gas and I was late a couple times. Sure I refused to be forced into an unsafe situation meeting a stranger at 04.30 in the dark to train him alone....but to get fired for all of it? I figured it would happen since I had innocent inquires.

Kathleen Pearce/ former employee of Bantek West-Pendum Armored.

 

08.08.2007 at 01:42 Reply
I work in the Armored industry and it sounds to me like Kathleen or Kathy and Curt are just a couple of whinny bitches. Get over it, no armored company out there proviced body armor, and very few provide a wepond. I provided my own body armor and wepon and have no beef about it at all. It sounds to me like you got told tuff by OROSHA so you ran to the media looking for support. Well dont expect any...I think this article is stupid and foolish....whats the point??? what do you think getting this article publish will do? Make your long waits in the UNEMPLOYMENT LINE better? right. Well let me know how that goes for you, all this article proved is that there is nothing wrong with the company or OROShA would have done something. Sounds to me like you pissed away a good job and this article is just sour grapes. HAHAHA

 

08.08.2007 at 01:56 Reply
Since most employees who do this type of work already own their own firearm I don't think that's the point. When you qualify with DPSST you have to qualify with the same make and model you will carry on the job so it's not relevant that Pendum would give you a loan to buy a firearm. What is an issue is that a manager would loan their personal firearm to an unlicensed employee and tell them to hide it under the seat. This not only constitutes a concealed weapon but is also in violation of DPSST state laws. Giving a loaded firearm to an unlicensed person that is sent out into the general public is at the very least a serious safety issue. Sending armed employees out with that much money is criminal in my opinion. If I were a client of this company I would not only end my contract with them but also file charges against them. The 3 individuals who spoke up against this company and lost their jobs should be compensated and the Portland manager should be fired. An enterprise rental van to carry hundreds of thousands of dollars? Is this story even real? And for OSHA to blow it off because they don't have standards for armored cars? Then what good are they? I didn't know that OSHA only helped out if your industry met their criteria. I assumed that OSHA made sure that every employee was safe regardless of what they did for a living. I believe that not only DPSST should look into this but also a state agency higher than OSHA should get involved. To know that this is going on in my community with my money is stunning to say the least.

 

08.08.2007 at 02:17 Reply
Tad
"There wouldn't be a lot they could evaluate because Oregon OSHA doesn't have specific standards for the armored-car industry."

How convenient. That sounds like a typical response from a state agency. And these clowns get paid by our tax dollars. If this claim was about coffee being server too hot they'd be all over it.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close