Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Clinical Trial
February 6th, 2008 BETH SLOVIC | News
 

Clinical Trial

OHSU pits saving money against saving lives.

13 Comments
     
Tags:
ORAL COMMITMENT: Gregory Fowler gets his teeth cleaned at Russell Street Dental Clinic last week.
IMAGE: Vivian Johnson

For Gregory Fowler, dental care isn’t a routine visit. It’s a life-saving measure.

And for the 651 other HIV-positive patients who—like Fowler—turn each year to Russell Street Dental Clinic in North Portland for care, low-cost alternatives simply aren’t available. Not in Portland. Not in Oregon. Not in the entire Pacific Northwest.

“We’ve been really lucky in Portland to have Russell Street Dental,” says Fowler, 49.

But the crucial services the clinic has provided HIV-positive Portlanders and other high-needs and low-income residents for 30 years are now threatened.

That threat comes from Oregon Health&Science University’s reaction to a Dec. 28 decision by the Oregon Supreme Court.

The case involved Jordaan Clarke, a 3-month-old boy who, in 1998, suffered permanent brain damage in an OHSU recovery room after successful brain surgery. In December 2007, the court determined that injured patients at OHSU could seek unlimited liability claims against the hospital, which had been protected by a $200,000 liability cap because it is a public institution.

OHSU said eliminating the $200,000 cap would drive up its insurance rates to the point that it would require $30 million in cuts elsewhere.

One piece of those potential cuts would be closing the Russell Street clinic, which is affiliated with OHSU’s School of Dentistry.

Now the impending closure is alarming the small but vulnerable community of patients who depend on the clinic for low-cost dental care, crucial services that are subsidized by federal grants, the Oregon Health Plan and Medicaid.

Though OHSU owns the building and land at 214 N Russell St., it doesn’t charge the clinic rent or fees for utilities. The clinic is otherwise financially independent from OHSU; it pays all 30 of its employees.

For people with HIV, an oral infection can lead to death if the body can’t fight the bug. And many anti-retroviral medications promote tooth decay, undermining patients’ quality of life and making them susceptible to those infections.

“With a compromised immune system…oral care is paramount,” says Dr. Bob Johnson, a dentist who is also the clinic’s director. “You simply cannot afford an oral infection.”

A final decision about the clinic’s fate won’t be made for several weeks. The uproar, however, is already huge.

Jean Ann Van Krevelen, executive director of Cascade AIDS Project, says her group has pledged to help the clinic stay alive, because the alternative would be “disastrous.” In 2007, the clinic served a total of 4,000 patients. But it also recorded 14,000 visits, including 3,025 emergencies.

At the same time, the clinic served as a training ground for 100 dental students from OHSU and 60 hygienists-in-training from local community colleges.

“We can’t let a resource like this go,” Van Krevelen says.

Adding to the frustration is the fact that some of Russell Street’s supporters don’t trust OHSU’s motives for threatening to close the clinic. They say the warning could be a political maneuver to force the Legislature during its current one-month session to speed efforts to re-impose a limit on liability claims.

OHSU denies that.“This is not a public-relations ploy,” says Dr. Joseph Robertson, president of OHSU.

Instead, OHSU says the decision is purely a financial one. “We have an obligation to the state and the rest of our patients to maintain a sound chassis,” Robertson says.

A spokesman for OHSU says the clinic runs a deficit of $600,000 a year, about 0.04 percent of OHSU’s annual $1.4 billion budget.

That figure, too, is a source of contention. The number is an estimate from OHSU based on a small operating window. In other words, it’s an extrapolation, not actual accounting. “If you’re looking at a $600,000 shortfall, that’s hard to make up,” says Johnson, the clinic’s director. “But if you’re looking at a $50,000 to $100,000 shortfall, that’s a manageable amount. That lends itself to a financial solution. And that’s where I believe we are.”

Robertson earned more than $1 million with bonuses in 2006, according to an annual report from Oregon Health News . His base pay in 2008 is $780,000—more than half the entire annual $1.5 million budget for the Russell Street clinic.

“We have been discussing executive compensation with human resources as recently as yesterday,” Robertson said last Friday, Feb. 1 when asked if he would accept a pay cut.

Closing the Russell Street clinic shouldn’t be an option, supporters say. “The safety net system in Portland cannot possibly begin to absorb the services offered at Russell Street Dental,” Johnson says.


FACT: OHSU’s other proposed reductions include cutting 200-300 jobs, closing another clinic in Eastern Oregon, and eliminating or outsourcing services at the March Wellness Center in South Waterfront.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
02.06.2008 at 07:54 Reply
You lost me when you disingenuously stated OHSU's budget. That number includes things that can't be routed like grants and endowed chairs. Why should I trust anything else you say?

 

02.06.2008 at 12:28 Reply
T
I'm quite familiar with OHSU and while they have fine medical practitioners, the politics reeks of profit and self interest at all cost. The prima donna complex needs to go in favor of integrity and respect, and believe me, there are managers lacking in those categories.

 

02.06.2008 at 01:12 Reply
A
You mention the impact on community colleges. OHSU has lost sight of the University part of its charter, a significant part of its very name. Community college students often lack access to patient charts, frequently act as the additional help that hospital staff need due to short staffing, and now will be displaced if OHSU prevails. Community colleges can't count on OHSU anymore to help train the next generation of care providers.

When I think of OHSU, I don't think so much about medical care anymore. I think of nursing strikes, staff shortfalls, and corporate arrogance from the highest levels. How the mighty have fallen...

 

02.06.2008 at 01:33 Reply
T
My experience precisely "A". Get rid of the arrogance and power enhancing and OHSU will be a much better place.

 

02.06.2008 at 02:51 Reply
Jim Newman here from the communications office at OHSU.

I appreciate that Willamette Week allows commentary following its stories and want to take the opportunity to clarify a few issues as I worked with Beth on this story.

First, I don?t think the story places this possible clinic closure into context. OHSU went to great lengths to ensure that the $30 million impact of the tort cap loss had limited impact on patients. This is apparent if you review the entire list of proposed financial measures: increases in tuition, closure or transfer or March Wellness, downsizing of the School of Engineering, reductions in research across all of our schools and of course reduced staffing.

The story doesn?t really explain the financial picture fully. While the clinic may support its staffing, the university pays the overhead costs of maintenance, security, supplies, heat and water. The story also fails to mention that the clinic will also need to pay for a share of the costs of the tort cap ruling. When WW compares the cost of the clinic?s operation to OHSU?s entire budget (the total amount of money OHSU receives through grants, patient fees, etc) that figure fails to encompass the huge costs of providing health care: pay for nurses, purchases of medical equipment and supplies, caring for the uninsured and other expensive and important functions of OHSU. In other words, a budget is not the same as a profit and may give readers the wrong impression unless placed into context.

I also hoped the story would have detailed the efforts OHSU is undertaking to try to preserve the clinic and/or its services by revisiting the earlier financial estimates and looking for solutions.

Finally, the record shows that the financial impacts of the tort loss are very real, very urgent and long lasting. An analysis conducted by an independent risk and insurance consultant in 2006 predicted the annual losses to OHSU of tens of millions of dollars if the tort cap were lost. Even under a new tort cap, the constitutionality of the cap likely would be tested in the courts, which would probably take years. Until that time, significant financial challenges created by the lack of a court-tested tort cap will continue to exist. Therefore suggestions that OHSU?s cuts are linked to a legislative agenda are in direct conflict with the reality of the situation.

Thanks for the chance to respond.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close