Monday, February 13

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 3
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · The Deciders
February 13th, 2008 JAMES PITKIN | News
 

The Deciders

Who are Oregon’s superdelegates, and how will they vote?

12 Comments
     
Tags:

With Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) battling over every delegate to the Democratic National Convention, the presidential nominee could be chosen by a lofty and previously obscure class of party officials known as superdelegates.

Oregon’s 12 superdelegates are Gov. Ted Kulongoski; U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden; U.S. Reps. Earl Blumenauer, Darlene Hooley, David Wu and Peter DeFazio; Secretary of State Bill Bradbury; and Democratic Party officials Meredith Wood Smith, Frank Dixon, Wayne Kinney, Jenny Greenleaf and Gail Rasmussen.

They are among about 800 national superdelegates given a ballot at the convention in Denver Aug. 25-28. But they’re not beholden to voters and can back any candidate, putting them in position to decide the nominee if Obama and Clinton keep splitting delegates chosen in state primaries and caucuses.

If you’re keeping score at home, only three of Oregon’s 12 have publicly endorsed a candidate. Kulongoski and Hooley are for Clinton. Blumenauer likes Obama. The rest say they’re uncommitted.

Party officials get regular calls from both campaigns. But they’re standing by a pledge they all made not to go public with their favorites until after Oregon’s May 20 primary—though that doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll go with the popular vote, even if it’s overwhelmingly for one candidate.

Since we have lots of time to kill before the May primary and they’re not tipping their hands, let’s have some informed speculation on which way several of the party officials might lean.

Dixon is past president of the Democrats’ GLBT caucus and a board member for the gay-rights group Basic Rights Oregon. Obama has won kudos for taking risky stands on gay rights, and Clinton’s husband won no friends for his “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy in the military when he was president. One for Obama?

Kinney works in Wyden’s office in Bend. Wyden’s chief of staff (and Kinney’s boss), Josh Kardon, is on Clinton’s Oregon steering committee. One for Clinton?

Greenleaf went against the establishment in 2004 and supported former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean’s presidential run. Maybe one for Obama, if Greenleaf turns against Clinton, who is backed by more of the party establishment.

Rasmussen is vice president of the Oregon Education Association. In New Hampshire, the endorsement by the state chapter of that teachers union helped power Clinton to victory. One for Clinton?

Frustrated that we’re left to guess? We are, too. Vent away at wweek.com about what Oregon’s superdelegates should do.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
02.13.2008 at 08:06 Reply
We need election reform. Super delegates and delegates should be totally eliminated from the election. The will of the people is the popular vote. However, since we are stuck with this process this year our delegates should vote proportionally to the popular vote of Oregonians.

 

02.13.2008 at 08:07 Reply
I know each of the Democratic Party of Oregon's popularly elected "supah" delegates, and I trust their integrity. They're good people with solid Democratic values. And, because I believe representative democracy works, I admire the current delegate system, which was put in place after 1968 to end the "smoky back-room" practices which prevailed to that point.

The overwhelming majority of delegates are determined by the casual primary voters (52 of 65 delegates in Oregon). These primary voters may have switched parties as little as 30 days before the primary. This large majority of delegates have zero discretion to vote their conscience. They are bound to vote based on the overall primary vote, no matter what they may actually think of their assigned ("pledged") candidate.

At the same time, a small "supah" minority (13 of 65 delegates in Oregon) are allowed to vote their conscience, as to whom they feel is the best Democrat, without being locked into the general primary vote. They're permitted this discretion because of their demonstrated commitment to Democratic Party values, which got them elected to their role within the party.

Personally, I like the idea that a small core of Oregonians who've demonstrated active commitment to Democratic Party values - and have been popularly elected by their fellow party members as a result - are permitted to vote their conscience. General public opinion - reflected by the average voter - is more easily swayed by advertising, as the average voter will often have paid less attention to the issues than a committed activist who sought and won popular election as a party officer. Experience, dedication, and commitment to Democratic Party values mean something, and thankfully the delegate system respects this fact.

 

02.13.2008 at 08:57 Reply
Leo,

Your position is similar to our founding father's electoral college idea. Basically the general public is too dumb and easily swayed to directly elect a president. I don't buy that and I don't buy you're argument either. We, the public, have demonstatrated time and again we are not that easily swayed -- see all the smoke advertising associated with all the ballot measures each election.

 

02.13.2008 at 10:07 Reply
Bart

While you are changing the electoral college and eliminating the super delegates, please do the same for the caucuses. Especially like the ones we have here in IA where these people are under represented: shift workers, the elderly, and those that can not afford a baby sitter.

 

02.13.2008 at 12:14 Reply
I beleive the NH teachers union was American Federation of Teachers, which is a totally different union than NEA/OEA. AFT is part of the AFL-CIO while NEA is independent of the AFL and Change to Win. I do not beleive that NEA has endorsed yet.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close