Friday, February 03

Oregon Lawmaker Accused of Diverting Money from A Defense Contractor to Bankroll GOP Candidates

A federal lawsuit says Sen. Brian Boquist, R-Dallas, misappropriated funds from a military training firm he owns

News State Sen. Brian Boquist (R-Dallas) allegedly misappropriated "thousands of dollars" from a U.S. mil... More

Feb 3, 2012 08:34 am by COREY PEIN  | Comments 3
 

Grocery Union Leader and Others React to Anti-Labor Language in New Seasons Market Handbook

News A story in this week's print edition of WW exploring mayoral candidate Eileen Brady's work behind th... More

Feb 3, 2012 08:07 am by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 12
 

Metro Councilor Hosticka Files For House Seat: Updated

News Metro Councilor Carl Hosticka filed last week to run for House District 37, the seat currently held ... More

Feb 2, 2012 06:01 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 0
 

UO Officials Seem to Know Little About $63 Million Athletics Building Going Up on Campus

News Work is underway on the expansion of an athletics building on the University of Oregon campus, only ... More

Feb 2, 2012 12:15 pm by WW Staff  | Comments 0
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · News · Tax-Guzzlers
June 25th, 2008 COREY PEIN | News
 

Tax-Guzzlers

With gas so pricey, do yuppie hybrid buyers really need a tax-break carrot anymore?

26 Comments
     
Tags:
$UB$IDY QUEST
IMAGE: waltonportfolio.com

While less enlightened Americans cling to their one-ton pickups adorned with Jesus-fish emblems, Portlanders treasure their slick, quiet, high-mpg hybrid cars. The Portland metro area now has more hybrids per capita—about 1 for every 340 households—than any other city in the country, according to market researchers.

Which prompts the question: If demand is already high and climbing as fast as the price of gasoline, why does the state keep giving away money to people buying hybrids?

Like many states, Oregon has long offered generous tax credits—on top of existing federal tax credits—to buyers of new hybrids.

Businesses claim up to 35 percent of a hybrid’s cost as a state tax credit. Individuals can claim state income tax deductions of up to $1,500 for one of 14 hybrid models, including the GMC Yukon hybrid SUV (standard retail price: $51,000, 21 mpg in the city) and the Lexus LS 600h ($105,000, and 20 mpg in the city).

Since these tax credits’ inception in 1999, they have cost the state over $13 million, or nearly enough to buy every graduating senior in Portland Public Schools a year’s tuition at Oregon State University. Last year alone, the state doled out $5 million in hybrid tax credits.

The idea was to make fuel-efficient cars a more attractive buy, thus cutting pollution and saving the world. But today’s record gas prices—pushing $4.50 a gallon—are a better sales pitch for hybrids than any tax incentive.

“The tax credit has outlived its purpose,” says Chuck Sheketoff, director of the Oregon Center for Public Policy. “It outlived it from the get-go.”

When WW asked several Portland-area Democratic lawmakers if they would be open to revisiting the hybrid credits in the 2009 Legislature, they all said yes.

“Our tax incentives ought to be based not on whether a car is a hybrid, but whether a car is fuel-efficient,” says state Rep. Ben Cannon, a Democrat from Southeast Portland.

If you want to buy a hybrid—with or without the incentive—take a number.

At Broadway Toyota in Northeast Portland, there are 300 people on a waiting list for Priuses, says sales manager Chris Hall. Another 50 are waiting for Camry hybrids. Problem is, Toyota can’t make enough of the special batteries that power its cars. “We have more buyers than we have [hybrid] cars,” says Kent VanArnam, marketing director for Dick Hannah Dealerships, which sells Toyota and Honda hybrids.

Auto dealers say demand is up not just for hybrids, but for all fuel-efficient cars. And there’s evidence the hybrid tax credit was never a selling point for many.

A statewide survey by the Oregon Environmental Council in 2003 found one in four hybrid buyers neglected to claim the credits. Only two in five said they were a factor in their decision to buy.

About 2,450 Portlanders have claimed the credits, according to the state Energy Department. That’s clearly just a slice of local hybrid owners, considering that people in the metro area bought 1,380 hybrids in May alone, according to research by hybridcars.com and R.L. Polk & Co.

There’s another issue, just as troubling as an outdated tax credit siphoning money that could be better used elsewhere: fairness.

People who take mass transit burn less fuel—and therefore contribute less to global warming and other evils—than people who drive hybrids. According to the eco-wonks at Seattle’s Sightline Institute, a mostly full transit bus is three times more efficient than a Prius with a lone driver.

Of course, the No. 6 line doesn’t have a moonroof.

By mapping out the addresses of tax credit recipients, it’s clear that hybrid owners live all over the city—except east of 82nd Avenue and in swaths of North and Northeast Portland. The latter areas have some of TriMet’s most packed bus routes. They’re also some of Portland’s least wealthy, least white neighborhoods.

So, yuppies who can afford a $22,000 new Prius get a tax giveaway. Meanwhile, the poor get squeezed—even though their daily commute is cleaner. Squeezed how? Well, TriMet is set to charge monthly passholders an extra $120 a year, to cover higher diesel prices. That ain’t cheap, especially if you make Oregon’s minimum wage of $7.95 an hour.

As Sheketoff points out, the $5 million in hybrid credits last year could’ve gone to health care or schools—or stayed in the pockets of riders who will cover TriMet’s $4.5 million budget deficit.

“It’s an issue of budget priorities,” Sheketoff says.

Web Extra: Hybrid Owners in Portland


FACT: Local notables who claimed the $1,500 hybrid credits include Portland Mayor Tom Potter and Commissioner Dan Saltzman, U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), green developer Mark Edlen and state Sen. Vicki Walker (D-Eugene).

The single biggest benefactor of Oregon’s business tax credit for hybrids has been FedEx, a Tennessee corporation, which claimed $276,000 for a hybrid fleet upgrade in 2007.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
06.25.2008 at 06:08 Reply
Individuals get two state tax CREDITS when they buy a new hybrid, not tax deductions. The sentence "Individuals can claim state income tax deductions of up to $1,500 for one of 14 hybrid models..." should read "Individuals can claim state income tax credits of up to $1,500 for one of 14 hybrid models..."

 

06.25.2008 at 08:36 Reply
I recently bought a Nissan Altima hybrid and am aware of the tax credit that comes with purchase - but it didn't influence my decision to buy a hybrid. As a hybrid owning white yuppy I would fully support removing the tax credit. How about building more lanes for carpoolers and bike lanes instead? I carpool in my hybrid and would much rather have less traffic then a tax credit.

 

06.25.2008 at 08:44 Reply
Mr. Sheketoffski is correct. Deductions reduce taxable income. "Credits" amount to free money, an entitlement of sorts. Big difference in the cost to non-qualified tax payers.

I wouldn't have a problem with a tax deduction for ALL fuel efficient vehicles, though as pointed out incentives aren't really needed. The hybrid credit on the other hand is an outlandish handout.

Great topic that a lot of folks wouldn't think about otherwise.

 

06.26.2008 at 05:51 Reply
Gee, you mean letting the market dictate trends, not government mandates, actually works? That's very anti-liberal. This is Willamette Week, isn't it?

 

06.26.2008 at 08:45 Reply
Why is appropriate for the writer of this story to impugn the religious beliefs of others? The insolent little comment about fish stickers...

At that point in his article I determined Corey was a snotty little fuck & I couldn't care less if he wanted to tell me about a cure for cancer. He lost all credibility right there.

And no, I'm not religious, I don't attend, contribute to, or subscribe to any religious group of belief.

I'm just sick of "progressives" that constantly demean other people because of their life choices.

Your newspaper is the first to decry "hate speech", but you purvey it in almost every article. As long as it pertains to conservative, religious, or political groups that you disagree. Your hipocrisy is stunning in it's near totality.

As far as being "more enlightend" in Portland, that operates on the basic assumption that you know what is best for the lives of others. That's a pretty arrogant and presumtuous concept.

Perhaps Corey, with his vast life experience could tell me where to place a 300 lb. compressor in a prius?

Then he could go change his panty-shield.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close