Tuesday, February 14

Grimm Recap: Made in Organ and The MILF Huntress

Movies & Television Grimm, Season 1, Episode 10: “Organ Grinder”Beast of the Week: Geiers, goblins with vulture-like... More

Feb 13, 2012 12:54 pm by MATTHEW SINGER  | Comments 0
 

See That Wieden+Kennedy Super Bowl Ad With Clint Eastwood? It Was Directed by David Gordon Green

Plus it was written by Lents poet Matthew Dickman

Movies & Television Another Super Bowl, another PR coup for Wieden+Kennedy. By overwhelming consensus, the ad agency's "... More

Feb 6, 2012 12:35 pm by Aaron Mesh  | Comments 6
 

The Dream of the 1890s is Alive in Portland

Movies & Television We don't make a habit of posting Portlandia clips, but if you don't find this funny, you have no sou... More

Feb 2, 2012 12:33 pm by Ruth Brown  | Comments 10
 

Before You Watch The Grey, Watch These Three Movies

Movies & Television With its bloody Liam Neeson-on-wolf action, blockbuster The Grey, which opens in cinemas today, is g... More

Jan 27, 2012 02:10 pm by WW Arts & Culture Staff  | Comments 1
 
 
 
Home · Articles · Movies · Movie Reviews & Stories · Holy Bummer, Batman!
July 16th, 2008 AARON MESH | Movie Reviews & Stories
 

Holy Bummer, Batman!

Why so serious? Maybe because Heath Ledger’s dead.

27 Comments
     
Tags:
HE SURE DON’T WANT TO HURT NO ONE: Heath Ledger as the Joker.

“You can die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” Such is the rather grim assessment rendered at the beginning and close of The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan’s latest step in deconstructing the Batman franchise from superhero camp to a cry of universal despair, with souped-up cars. Roughly translated from pseudo-profundity, the line boils down to this: Only the good die young. It doesn’t take a careful analyst to catch which lost soul Nolan is thinking of. As the sequel to Batman Begins marches from cruel bereavement to spirit-crushing martyrdom, it plays like a funeral dirge for the late Heath Ledger, who died—maybe you heard—shortly after completing his role as the Joker. The movie operates in the pall of this demise, and its polished gloom carries the scent of an undergraduate term paper on the futility of human existence. This is the summer action movie that stopped taking its antidepressants.

As the Joker himself cackles from promotional posters: Why so serious? In fact, the only element in Nolan’s film with any life—and the sole reason why it’s worth seeing immediately—is Ledger’s work. He’s caked in grimy clown greasepaint with echoes of John Wayne Gacy, and trying out a sneering singsong that sounds a little like that of a demented Bugs Bunny. If the scars of the Joker’s facial mutilation still seem to be festering, it’s in large part because he’s constantly smacking his lips and flicking his tongue, as if still worrying at the sores in his mouth. (Who could have predicted that the most memorable sound of the summer movie season would be that of Heath Ledger’s saliva?) To watch him menace Gotham City with an arsenal of knives—and a No. 2 pencil—is to witness a gifted actor dedicate all his energies to gracefully waltzing through trash; the last time we saw such a deft display, Johnny Depp was donning a pirate hat.

Ledger’s Joker is so much fleeter than anyone else on the screen—especially Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne, who alternates between sniveling and glowering, and Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey Dent, who is perfectly gormless—that his every act is a provocation and a parody. He’s baiting Batman and Gotham law enforcement, begging them to respond to his diabolical energy with lumbering violence.

The movie dutifully obliges. It is an elegant picture (Nolan’s longtime cinematographer Wally Pfister frames gorgeous Chicago panoramas in both 35mm and IMAX formats), but it is atrociously edited, with each individual scene bearing no causal relationship to the next. The Joker is supposed to be a wily escape artist, but that’s difficult to confirm, since The Dark Knight loses track of nearly all of its characters for long stretches. Maybe the confusion is intentional: It allows Nolan to leap at will into fantasies of suffering, as Wayne’s allies are imperiled, saved and destroyed at random junctures. Finally, Batman is tormented with the same catch-22 that faced Peter Parker in Sam Raimi’s first Spider-Man picture: He can rescue the woman he loves or defend the justice he believes in. But this movie isn’t going to weasel out of the dilemma—instead, it positively wriggles in masochistic delight at the prospect of heroic anguish. The world is a cruel and absurd place, you see. Ow! Ow!

So The Dark Knight lives up to its title, yeah—in the world of comic-book movies, it’s a Suicide Girl at a sorority house, showing off its freaky tattoos. It keeps finding more to display; when Batman makes his agonized decision, the movie still has a humorless hour to go, and even the sight of Ledger dressed as an exceptionally naughty nurse only enlivens things so much. Audiences will leave knowing they’ve seen a special performance, but also feeling that they’ve endured something suffocating. This movie wants to watch its heroes die, and it indulges that desire long enough to become distinctly villainous.


SEE IT: The Dark Knight is rated PG-13. It opens Friday at Broadway, Cedar Hills, Eastport, Cinema 99, City Center, Division, Hilltop, Lake Twin, Lloyd Center, Movies on TV, Oak Grove, Pioneer Place, Sandy, Sherwood, Vancouver Plaza and Wilsonville.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
07.16.2008 at 02:14 Reply
I dunno. I've been an avid batman fan since before I can remember. Dad forced me to watch Adam West before taking me to see Jack Nicholson, and even the shitty films where Batman had nipples I tried with an open mind. The "exclusive screening" that I downloaded the other week was given the same open mind.

With that being said, Bale's character is nearly perfect. Batman Begins and Dark Knight do what so many movies fail to do in that they make the villians memorable *even when they are not in the scene*, no need for recuts to the location of so-and-so to keep a.d.d. audiences interested. From this, Bale-Batman's stiffness and determination to realize his dual persona are contrasted purposely against sociopathic villians; on two different ends of the spectrum, but both totally insane. Just because a character is off the screen doesn't mean they are out of the scene.

Secondly, any readers of the comic books know that Batman (and especially the Joker) are not the lively, humorous bubble-people that belong to Fantastic Four or fight crime to get the girl. Batman is nuts. His villians are nuts. The whole city is nuts. It's all dark. Batman kicks the shit out some chick, then Bruce Wayne taps her. Batman is supposed to be dark, depressing, suffocated, and bleak. It's a goddamn shame that it took until 2006 to put that vision on the screen.

Final point? Batman is the only superhero to encompass two very anti-superhero qualities: complete mortality and zero morality. Batman is not supercharged or mutated. He's just a guy who built a bunch of cool shit and trained really hard. From this, he uses his powers to fight villians just for the hell of it, instead of helping citizens or even his poor parents' justice (he already did that years ago). He fights because he's full of testosterone and has nothing better to do.

One obsessive sociopath hellbent on seeing his perspective of justice realized deserves another. Anyone watching this film not under the influence of PBR and deadlines should get the message: good and evil are one of the same, separated only by intention and completely lacking in intrinsic difference.

This is a perfect film and anyone that disagrees should just go see Hellboy and get what they want (a goofy, nonsensical cartoon). This is not a superhero movie or a summer blockbuster. It's a goddamn work of art, even at shitty resolution on my laptop.

Citizen Wayne deserves a better write-up than "omg no lolz from the joker."

 

07.17.2008 at 03:53 Reply
Speaking of pseudo-profundity: fleeter? gormless?

The antagonistically clunky word choices ended up distracting me from the actual content of the review. Boo.

 

07.18.2008 at 12:08 Reply
bl3
This review is spot on.

The movie lacks coherence. And though Batman is complex and tortured, the inability to effectively edit or in some scenes direct an intelligible piece of cinema destroys the movie as a whole.

There were an excess of interesting characters that added to the miasma, pulling the film in unnecessary and ultimately unfulfiling directions.

I wanted this movie to be great. I would have settled for good. I left disappointed.

 

07.19.2008 at 12:05 Reply
So what the reviewer is saying is that they're madly in love with Heath Ledger, and that everything is bleak and meaningless without him, right? Keep hiding behind your esoteric vocabulary choices, dude. A movie review shouldn't be for you and your three best friends. Try to keep in mind that most people in this world may not be as smart as you seem to think you are, and you'll reach more of them with your writing. You're dangerously close to being the Fox News of criticism, only for an audience near the opposite end of the "gormless" spectrum. And obviously, yes - I liked the movie.

 

07.19.2008 at 07:40 Reply
Maybe you found the film lacking in coherence cause you missed a scene or two while thumbing through your thesaurus.

This movie required your attention and plot points were often revealed in very brief sequences. "Oooh. I couldn't follow the movie. And obviously that can't be MY fault so..."

And apparently you also thought it a bit too bleak for you? Maybe you just aren't cut out for PG-13? I think the film you wanted this to be would suck.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close