Tuesday, February 14

Sam Adams is on Yelp

News The other day I noticed a curious tweet from our venerable mayor's Twitter account:Yes, Sam is tweet... More

Feb 13, 2012 01:20 pm by RUTH BROWN  | Comments 1
 

Doctor Groups Flex Muscle In Capitol: $2.3 Million in Campaign Cash to Influence Health-Care Reform

News The State Capitol has been abuzz the last couple of days because of a hot list (PDF) circulating in ... More

Feb 10, 2012 06:00 pm by NIGEL JAQUISS  | Comments 4
 

Nonsense Knows No State Boundary: Washington Legislators Get Bogus Job Claims on CRC

News Up north of here, Washington legislators in Olympia are debating whether or not they should authoriz... More

Feb 10, 2012 09:09 am  | Comments 1
 

Occupy Arrestees Win Their Right to Full Trials—Even Though They May Not Need It

News The estimated 160 people arrested during Occupy Portland protests in the past five months have won t... More

Feb 9, 2012 01:24 pm by HANNAH HOFFMAN  | Comments 4
 
 
 
Home · Articles · News · Rogue of the Week · You Can’t Spell “Obsession” Without The O.
October 1st, 2008 Katie Gilbert | Rogue of the Week
 

You Can’t Spell “Obsession” Without The O.

A new way to spark reader interest: Distribute a DVD that PO’s subscribers.

18 Comments
     
Tags:
On Broadway: About 75 protesters marched Monday outside The Oregonian offices at 1320 SW Broadway to protest its distribution of a DVD, Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West.
IMAGE: Katie Gilbert

In a very busy news week—from the first presidential debate to Wall Street’s meltdown—The Oregonian made its own headlines by inserting a DVD in its Sunday editions that managed to tick off local Muslims, Christians and Jews, as well as non-believers.

The target of their anger, this week’s Rogue—publisher Fred Stickel and his decision to accept the paid insert from the New York-based Clarion Fund, which produced the hourlong film, Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West. They said the film (see review, this page) incited fear of Muslims by assuming an educational tone while airily linking Islam to terrorist organizations.

“It is the moral obligation of a newspaper to inform, not to misinform,” United Methodist minister Rev. Chuck Cooper said to applause from about 75 demonstrators protesting Monday outside the daily’s downtown office. “The Oregonian gets a well-deserved F for citizenship.”

The day before, Stickel was quoted in a news story The Oregonian ran on the controversial film as saying that he watched Obsession before deciding to include it, and “could find no reason to reject [it].”

“I’ve always felt we have an obligation to keep our advertising columns as open as possible,” Stickel said, adding that the newspaper’s policy is not to disclose how much it gets for particular ads. “Our acceptance of anything—our acceptance or rejection—does not depend on whether or not we agree with the content.… There is a principle of freedom of speech involved here.”

However, in years past, Stickel—a devout Catholic—has rejected ads such as those for the 1973 Marlon Brando film Last Tango in Paris and for condoms in the 1980s.

The O—which, like all newspapers, is losing print ad revenue—joined the ranks of papers such as The New York Times and The Denver Post that have distributed the Obsession DVD.

Other papers, such as the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and the Detroit Free Press, declined to accept the DVD.

“We did meet and discuss this particular DVD with our newsroom,” said Free-Press senior vice president of advertising Rebecca Steckler. “And due to the graphic images on the DVD that were not labeled on the packaging, we did not feel it was in the best interest of our company to accept this advertisement.”

Protesters outside The Oregonian on Monday blasted the daily for not doing the same.

Waving white flags with doves on them and chanting, “Say no to hatred, Fred!” protesters attracted honks and waves of approval from passing motorists during the 45-minute rally.

Local faith and civil rights leaders formed the Good Faith Coalition in response last week to The Oregonian’s plans to enclose the DVD in its Sunday paper, which landed as Ramadan comes to a close.

On Sept. 25, the group hand-delivered a letter to Stickel’s office, asking The Oregonian to at least consider postponing distribution of the film until someone from the paper had met with the Good Faith Coalition and listened to the group’s concerns. The O reported Tuesday that the “vast majority” of about 500 callers contacting the paper about the DVD opposed its distribution. Circulation director Kevin Denny was quoted as saying “very few” canceled their subscriptions.


FACT: Mayor Tom Potter also called Stickel on Sept. 25 to ask him not to distribute Obsession.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 

 

 
10.01.2008 at 07:55 Reply
C W
I got that anti-muslim DVD in my Sunday paper AND it was also in my Tuesday paper. Did anyone else get it in their Tuesday paper? I cut it in half and mailed it back to the "O" with a note asking them not to distribute hate-propaganda to me. I wish more people would speak out against the Oregonian but it seems like its just going to blow over.

 

10.01.2008 at 12:12 Reply
My main hope is that The Oregonian, now that has become the champion of "unpopular" free speech, also commits to unfettered, balanced, and investigative journalism and opinion on Middle East issues. Too long it has ignored stories that, for example, put Israel in a bad light, underplayed Israel's settlement activities, ignored Palestinian and Israel protests against demolitions and land confiscation, and has generally ignored full opinion pieces that represent alternatives to the staunchly pro-Israel line of the Oregonian. The Oregonian seems satisfied to distribute materials that are unpopular to many Oregonians, will it now run stories and opinions that are unpopular to the Oregonian's own editorial staff?

 

10.01.2008 at 12:23 Reply
I honestly don't understand what all this silly fuss is about. I've seen that "Obsession" dvd at the library (SE 39th branch) for monthes & noone ever made a stink about it then.

 

10.01.2008 at 12:27 Reply
A second copy was tucked into the free Foodday on Tuesday.

Count me as one less subscriber to the O.

 

10.01.2008 at 12:31 Reply
It is important to note what the "O" censored (movies, condoms, etc.). Apparently free speech is not free for everybody.

 

 
 

Web Design for magazines

Close
Close
Close