City Commissioner Steve Novick has confirmed the plan to split his proposed Portland street fee into two parts—and pass the household fee first, while delaying the charge on businesses.
But he says City Council must pass the business fee by November 14, or lose the whole proposal.
"The Mayor's and my plan is to move forward with a vote on a residential fee, and set a deadline of November 14, 2014 for the City Council to pass a nonresidential fee," Novick says in a statement. "Both fees would take effect as of July 1, 2015. If Council does not pass a nonresidential fee by November 14, the residential fee would be cancelled."
That November deadline is being written into the language of the $138-a-household fee, which City Council will vote on June 4.
Mayor Charlie Hales' office told WW last night that city officials planned to take up the business side of the fee within a few weeks. But the November deadline means City Hall could try to delay long enough keep opponents of the fee from referring it to the November ballot.
A public hearing on the divided fee starts today at 2 pm.
Here's the full text of Novick's statement:
It is true, as some outlets reported yesterday, that the
Mayor and I are proposing to do further work on the business / nonresidential
side of the proposed Transportation User Fee before putting it to a vote before
Council. This does not mean that we are planning to have a fee for residents
but no fee for businesses; in fact, we are putting language in the residential
fee ordinance that says that if the Council does not pass a nonresidential fee
by this November, the residential fee will be cancelled. Both residential and
nonresidential users would start paying as of July 2015. But we do think there
is reason to do more work on the business/nonresidential fee.
The business / nonresidential fee is inherently more
complicated than the residential fee. What we plan to do, as other cities have
done, is base the nonresidential fee on the Institute of Traffic Engineersâ
âtrip generationâ model. The ITE divides up businesses and other nonresidential
users into a number of categories, and then, based on a lot of research, gives
a figure for each type of business for how many âtripsâ (e.g., traffic) each
type generates, per month, for a given number of square feet. Business pay fees based on how many
trips they generate.
Other cities use the ITE, but there is some variation in the
way they use it; not every cityâs nonresidential fee is calculated the same
way. Some cities, for example, combine some related ITE categories into one category.
In Portland, in 2007, PBOT worked with many representatives
of the business community to create a formula for using the ITE that was
broadly acceptable to most of those representatives. In this yearâs effort, we
took that formula as a starting point, figuring that since it was broadly
acceptable in 2007, it would be this year as well.
Over the past week, however, reading numerous emails from
small business owners, it became clear to me that many business owners were not
part of that 2007 process, and have a lot of questions. Some are not sure which
of the ITE categories they fit into; some question the fairness of applying the
ITE model to their particular business. And it wasnât just business owners;
religious organizations and other property owners have concerns about the
application of the ITE model.
We still believe that the ITE manual is an appropriate basis
for computing nonresidential fees. But again, other cities have developed
variations on how to use the ITE. We think it is appropriate to take a few
months to give business owners and other nonresidential parties who may not
have been involved in the 2007 process to ask questions about and help shape
our particular formulation.
So, the Mayorâs and my plan is to move forward with a vote
on a residential fee, and set a deadline of November 14, 2014 for the City
Council to pass a nonresidential fee. Both fees would take effect as of July 1,
2015. If Council does not pass a nonresidential fee by November 14, the residential
fee would be cancelled.
I appreciate all the feedback and suggestions that this
proposal has garnered, and I look forward to continued dialogue.
Commissioner Steve Novick