February 3rd, 2010
Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments
January 27th, 2010
Oregon School Activities Association | Stop spelling “T-E-A-M” With an “I.” 0 comments
January 13th, 2010
Schubert Flint Public Affairs | Prop. 8’s fear mongers return to Oregon for Measures 66 and 67.3 comments
January 6th, 2010
Associated Oregon Industries | Claiming free speech to stomp unions.3 comments
December 16th, 2009
Lewis & Clark | Trafficking in B.S.18 comments
December 9th, 2009
Port Of Portland | What’s a public agency got against peaceful dissent?1 comment
November 18th, 2009
Bureau Of Transportation | One more mouth to feed.12 comments
November 11th, 2009
Washington Co. DA’s Office | Abusing a domestic violence law.28 comments
November 4th, 2009
University Of Oregon | Who’s killing Rudolph?7 comments
October 28th, 2009
Metro | A blowhard answer to global warming? 6 comments
![]() IMAGE: EBEN DICKINSON |
[June 1st, 2005] Forgive the Rogue's return visit to the Legislature, but this one can't be passed up.
Rep. Derrick Kitts (R-Hillsboro) loves go-carts, not to mention motorcycles and pocket bikes. And two weeks ago, Kitts showed that love by pushing a bill through the House that's remarkable even in this lackluster session. House Bill 3463, which now speeds to the Senate for consideration, would expand offerings at one Canby go-cart track, Pat's Acres.
In 2000, a Clackamas County hearings officer rejected a bid by track owner Chris Egger to let motorcycles race at the track.Kitts, who has been driving carts for 20 years, raced into action when he learned of the "outrage'' at his favorite track.
Kitts acknowledges that Egger is a friend and that he's got a keen interest in seeing the track thrive. "As a result of my hobby, I met some people who needed some help with government agencies," Kitts says. "I don't see anything wrong with that."
Kitts' obliviousnesss to public perception on this topic comes on top of other more serious concerns. In his campaign last fall, Kitts paid more than $14,000 to a consulting firm owned by his then-fiancée and more than $25,000 on an advertising firm that also employed him. Campaign finance rules permit such expenditures as long as they are arm's-length transactions.
Kitts says both companies provided legitimate services that he would have had to pay for anyway. "Why wouldn't I do business with a friend?" he asks.
RECENT COMMENTS ON “Derrick Kitts”
Derrick Kitts - the Selfish Representative I have done my best to gain Kitts' attention and response via e-mail, phone and in-person visits. After his careless attitude towards our community a...
illustrationWe like your new illustrator.—Adrienne, Robert, Sally, Dwight, Barbara
KittsMust have been a slow week for Rogues. My vote will cancel out Corinne's. Kitts hasn't been spectacular but I found him to be receptive and fair. Besides that, Lars can't stand him, so ...
Kitts puts a Capital K in Corruption!










