SURF, TURF OPPOSE RIVERS BILL
February 3rd, 2010
Rogue of the Week • Clearwire | For a communications company, it doesn’t listen too well.8 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Paulson Shoots, Scores | The Timbers’ Owner closes a sweet ballpark deal, but doubts remain.4 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Sex And The City | Will gender reassignment surgery be a new city insurance benefit? 2 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Second Time Around | What the mayor will likely tout in his State of the City Speech. 0 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Hot Seat • Gov. Ted Kulongoski | Why the governor wants to deal with your kicker check in his last session.5 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Murmurs • Always Asking, Always Telling.1 comment
February 3rd, 2010
Dr. Know • Dr. Know1 comment
February 3rd, 2010
Letters to the Editor • Inbox3 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Cover Story • The Crusaders | Eight relentless watchdogs who hound public officials in pursuit of answers.45 comments
February 3rd, 2010
Ask the Editor • What Were We Thinking? | WW Editor Mark Zusman answers your questions about our coverage.2 comments
![]() |
[June 8th, 2005] A bill in the Oregon Senate that tries to end long-running river disputes between landowners and recreational water users has gotten those rivals to agree on one thing-the measure stinks.
Both groups say the proposal backed by powerful Senate forces-Majority Leader Kate Brown (D-Portland) and Minority Leader Ted Ferrioli (R-John Day)-is so bad that they're working to sink the measure when the Senate votes on it next week.
But Brown says the unhappiness on both sides indicates "it's the perfect compromise.''
Here's how we got to this point.
The State Land Board currently decides river-use conflicts based on a complex set of "navigability'' rules. If the river is ruled navigable, then recreational users have a right to be on the river and on its banks. If the river is not considered navigable, then river users must ask landowner permission.
That process takes years and must be repeated each time a conflict arises.
Senate Bill 1028 aims to solve that problem by setting up a statewide plan for managing access to rivers.
Supporters say the new setup would lead to greater river access by promising to spell out the public's rights on any river where you can float a boat. Backers say that process also would help landowners by establishing new fees for boats, including kayaks and canoes, to pay for enforcement of recreational abuses.
But fishing, boating and river-rights groups are worried because the management plan's promise to spell out "time, manner, type and extent of recreational uses allowed" isn't defined. They fear that cattle farmers and landowners will try to fill in those blanks.
"Our concern is that the bill gives the public rights and then establishes a process for taking them away," said Phil Donovan, a lobbyist representing the Association of Northwest Steelheaders.
Cattle ranchers say the bill's assertion of public-access rights to the banks and riverbeds of nearly every river in the state violates their rights.
"This whole thing is an absolute private-property violation," said Glen Stonebrink, executive director of the Oregon Cattlemen's Association.
Despite the complaints, the bill's backing by the majority and minority Senate leaders should give it a boost in Salem. Gov. Ted Kulongoski has not weighed in on the bill but says he supports a solution to the river disputes.
"This is a solution to a problem,'' Brown says. "And it's time for both sides to compromise and get to yes."
RECENT COMMENTS ON “SURF, TURF OPPOSE RIVERS BILL”
Pleading for Balance and a Little History in your Reporting of Senate Bill 1028Dear Mr Chen:Unless you include in your article just WHERE river access rights stand presently in Oregon, you will...
Compromise Does Not Signify a Correct Path
Frankly, Senator Brown is using flawed logic when she states, the unhappiness on both sides indicates "it's the perfect compromise....
Arbitrary, Illegal and WrongI was very disappointed with your story today on SB 1028. I didn't realize that Williamette Week was in the practice of serving as a mouthpiece for a Legislator wit...
SURF, TURF OPPOSE RIVERS BILLI can see that land owners don't like people coming on their land. I don't want to go on someone Else's land; I just want to be able to fish in the river. Land ow...









